Steria (India) Ltd. v. CIT

386 ITR 390High Court2016#1383 most cited

What is Steria (India) Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Managerial services are not considered 'fees for included services' under Article 13(4) of the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, thus payments for such services are not taxable as FTS under the treaty.

83

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Steria (India) Ltd. v. CIT · managerial services · fees for included services · FTS · India-UK DTAA · Article 13(4) · Section 9(1)(vii) · Section 195 · non-resident taxation · make available condition · DTAA interpretation

Also reported as

72 Taxmann.com 1194 ITD 729241 Taxmann 268

Sections most often in play

Section 1961Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 234BSection 115ASection 234DSection 9(1)(vii)Section 195

Issues it is cited on

make available conditionsection 44bbbsection 35ddamake available clauseuse of equipmentsection 35ddsection 92c(1)dependent agent pesection 90(1)construction pefees for included servicessection 44bb

Judgments citing Steria (India) Ltd. v. CIT

ADIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs. Calyon Bank, Mumbai

ITA 4259/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.9071/मुं/2010 (िन.व. 2006-07) आअसं.3103/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1503/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1504/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aaccc-3872-B ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038 ......"ितवादी/Respondent आअसं.4259/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1483/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1868/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038. ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate gwithFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Dash, Sr. AR &
Section 143(3)

…Mitsui Banking Corporation vs. DDIT, 136 ITD 66 (Mum-SB). This is a recurring issue in assessee’s case. In Assessment Year 2005-06 similar issue had come up, the Tribunal placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Steria India Ltd., 386 ITR 390 dismissed the ground raised in appeal by the Revenue. 18.1 Both sides heard. We find that identical issue has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in an appeal by the Revenue in ITA No.6682/Mum/2012 for Assessment Year 2005-06 vide order dated 05/01/2018. The assessee has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Co…

Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Mumbai vs. Asst DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai

ITA 3103/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.9071/मुं/2010 (िन.व. 2006-07) आअसं.3103/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1503/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1504/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aaccc-3872-B ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038 ......"ितवादी/Respondent आअसं.4259/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1483/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1868/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038. ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate gwithFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Dash, Sr. AR &
Section 143(3)

…Mitsui Banking Corporation vs. DDIT, 136 ITD 66 (Mum-SB). This is a recurring issue in assessee’s case. In Assessment Year 2005-06 similar issue had come up, the Tribunal placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Steria India Ltd., 386 ITR 390 dismissed the ground raised in appeal by the Revenue. 18.1 Both sides heard. We find that identical issue has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in an appeal by the Revenue in ITA No.6682/Mum/2012 for Assessment Year 2005-06 vide order dated 05/01/2018. The assessee has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Co…

Asst DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs. Credit Agricole Corporation & Investments Bank, Mumbai

ITA 1868/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.9071/मुं/2010 (िन.व. 2006-07) आअसं.3103/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1503/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1504/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aaccc-3872-B ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038 ......"ितवादी/Respondent आअसं.4259/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1483/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1868/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038. ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate gwithFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Dash, Sr. AR &
Section 143(3)

…Mitsui Banking Corporation vs. DDIT, 136 ITD 66 (Mum-SB). This is a recurring issue in assessee’s case. In Assessment Year 2005-06 similar issue had come up, the Tribunal placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Steria India Ltd., 386 ITR 390 dismissed the ground raised in appeal by the Revenue. 18.1 Both sides heard. We find that identical issue has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in an appeal by the Revenue in ITA No.6682/Mum/2012 for Assessment Year 2005-06 vide order dated 05/01/2018. The assessee has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Co…

Credit Agricole Corporate and Investments Bank, Mumbai vs. Asst DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai

ITA 1504/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.9071/मुं/2010 (िन.व. 2006-07) आअसं.3103/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1503/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1504/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aaccc-3872-B ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038 ......"ितवादी/Respondent आअसं.4259/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1483/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1868/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038. ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate gwithFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Dash, Sr. AR &
Section 143(3)

…Mitsui Banking Corporation vs. DDIT, 136 ITD 66 (Mum-SB). This is a recurring issue in assessee’s case. In Assessment Year 2005-06 similar issue had come up, the Tribunal placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Steria India Ltd., 386 ITR 390 dismissed the ground raised in appeal by the Revenue. 18.1 Both sides heard. We find that identical issue has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in an appeal by the Revenue in ITA No.6682/Mum/2012 for Assessment Year 2005-06 vide order dated 05/01/2018. The assessee has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Co…

Credit Agricole Corporate and Investments Bank, Mumbai vs. Asst DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai

ITA 1503/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.9071/मुं/2010 (िन.व. 2006-07) आअसं.3103/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1503/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1504/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aaccc-3872-B ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038 ......"ितवादी/Respondent आअसं.4259/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1483/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1868/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038. ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate gwithFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Dash, Sr. AR &
Section 143(3)

…Mitsui Banking Corporation vs. DDIT, 136 ITD 66 (Mum-SB). This is a recurring issue in assessee’s case. In Assessment Year 2005-06 similar issue had come up, the Tribunal placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Steria India Ltd., 386 ITR 390 dismissed the ground raised in appeal by the Revenue. 18.1 Both sides heard. We find that identical issue has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in an appeal by the Revenue in ITA No.6682/Mum/2012 for Assessment Year 2005-06 vide order dated 05/01/2018. The assessee has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Co…

ADIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs. Calyon Bank, Mumbai

ITA 1483/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.9071/मुं/2010 (िन.व. 2006-07) आअसं.3103/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1503/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1504/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aaccc-3872-B ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038 ......"ितवादी/Respondent आअसं.4259/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1483/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1868/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038. ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate gwithFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Dash, Sr. AR &
Section 143(3)

…Mitsui Banking Corporation vs. DDIT, 136 ITD 66 (Mum-SB). This is a recurring issue in assessee’s case. In Assessment Year 2005-06 similar issue had come up, the Tribunal placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Steria India Ltd., 386 ITR 390 dismissed the ground raised in appeal by the Revenue. 18.1 Both sides heard. We find that identical issue has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in an appeal by the Revenue in ITA No.6682/Mum/2012 for Assessment Year 2005-06 vide order dated 05/01/2018. The assessee has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Co…

Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank ( Formerly Calyon Bank), Mumbai vs. ADIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai

ITA 9071/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.9071/मुं/2010 (िन.व. 2006-07) आअसं.3103/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1503/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1504/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aaccc-3872-B ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038 ......"ितवादी/Respondent आअसं.4259/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2007-08) आअसं.1483/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2008-09) आअसं.1868/मुं/2014 (िन.व. 2009-10) The Asstt. Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1(2) Mumbai, 1St Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai 400 038. ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (Formerly Calyon Bank), 11Th Floor, Hoechst House

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate gwithFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Dash, Sr. AR &
Section 143(3)

…Mitsui Banking Corporation vs. DDIT, 136 ITD 66 (Mum-SB). This is a recurring issue in assessee’s case. In Assessment Year 2005-06 similar issue had come up, the Tribunal placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Steria India Ltd., 386 ITR 390 dismissed the ground raised in appeal by the Revenue. 18.1 Both sides heard. We find that identical issue has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in an appeal by the Revenue in ITA No.6682/Mum/2012 for Assessment Year 2005-06 vide order dated 05/01/2018. The assessee has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Co…

Aluminium Pechiney, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1) Int. Tax., New Dehi

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 9484/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble Vice-Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aluminium Pechiney, Vs. Dcit, C/O- Ca, Praveen Gambhir, Circle-1(1)(1), 87-B, Masjid Moth Ph-2, International Taxation, Dda Flats, G.K. 3, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaica3338C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE VICE-PRESIDENT Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aluminium Pechiney, Vs. DCIT, C/o- CA, Praveen Gambhir, Circle-1(1)(1), 87-B, Masjid Moth Ph-2, International Taxation, DDA Flats, G.K. 3, New Delhi New Delhi PAN :AAICA3338C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Praveen Gambhir, CA Department by Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR Sh. Mrinal Kr. Das, Sr. DR Date of hearing 09.06.2023 Date of pronouncement 06.09.2023 ORDER Captioned a…

Aluminium Pechiney, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1) Int. Tax., New Dehi

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 9483/DEL/2019[ 2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble Vice-Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aluminium Pechiney, Vs. Dcit, C/O- Ca, Praveen Gambhir, Circle-1(1)(1), 87-B, Masjid Moth Ph-2, International Taxation, Dda Flats, G.K. 3, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaica3338C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE VICE-PRESIDENT Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aluminium Pechiney, Vs. DCIT, C/o- CA, Praveen Gambhir, Circle-1(1)(1), 87-B, Masjid Moth Ph-2, International Taxation, DDA Flats, G.K. 3, New Delhi New Delhi PAN :AAICA3338C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Praveen Gambhir, CA Department by Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR Sh. Mrinal Kr. Das, Sr. DR Date of hearing 09.06.2023 Date of pronouncement 06.09.2023 ORDER Captioned a…

M/S Aluminium Pechiney, New Delhi vs. DCIT (International Taxation), New Delhi

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 3410/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble Vice-Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aluminium Pechiney, Vs. Dcit, C/O- Ca, Praveen Gambhir, Circle-1(1)(1), 87-B, Masjid Moth Ph-2, International Taxation, Dda Flats, G.K. 3, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaica3338C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE VICE-PRESIDENT Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aluminium Pechiney, Vs. DCIT, C/o- CA, Praveen Gambhir, Circle-1(1)(1), 87-B, Masjid Moth Ph-2, International Taxation, DDA Flats, G.K. 3, New Delhi New Delhi PAN :AAICA3338C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Praveen Gambhir, CA Department by Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR Sh. Mrinal Kr. Das, Sr. DR Date of hearing 09.06.2023 Date of pronouncement 06.09.2023 ORDER Captioned a…

Tdk India Private Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS, Uttar-Pradesh

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 399/KOL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jul 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 393, 394, 395 & 396/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Tdk India Private Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Kulia Kanchrapara Road Vs Tax - Cpc, Tds P.O. Netaji Subhas Sanatorium Kalyani Nadia - 741251 [Pan : Aaaci6950Q] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, A/RFor Respondent: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT D/R
Section 201Section 250

…) has held that no separate notification is required to be issued by the Government of India in order to make the protocol applicable. And the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Steria (India) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 386 ITR 390 (Del). (2016) wherein the Hon'ble High Court has held that no separate notification is required for application of paragraph 7 of the protocol contained in Indo-France Tax Treaty. The Hon'ble Court has further held that issuance of a notification has nowhere been stipulated as a condition precedent therein. Section 90(1) of the Act is very clear…

Tdk India Private Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS, Uttar-Pradesh

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 398/KOL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jul 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 393, 394, 395 & 396/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Tdk India Private Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Kulia Kanchrapara Road Vs Tax - Cpc, Tds P.O. Netaji Subhas Sanatorium Kalyani Nadia - 741251 [Pan : Aaaci6950Q] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, A/RFor Respondent: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT D/R
Section 201Section 250

…) has held that no separate notification is required to be issued by the Government of India in order to make the protocol applicable. And the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Steria (India) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 386 ITR 390 (Del). (2016) wherein the Hon'ble High Court has held that no separate notification is required for application of paragraph 7 of the protocol contained in Indo-France Tax Treaty. The Hon'ble Court has further held that issuance of a notification has nowhere been stipulated as a condition precedent therein. Section 90(1) of the Act is very clear…

Tdk India Private Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS, Uttar-Pradesh

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 397/KOL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jul 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 393, 394, 395 & 396/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Tdk India Private Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Kulia Kanchrapara Road Vs Tax - Cpc, Tds P.O. Netaji Subhas Sanatorium Kalyani Nadia - 741251 [Pan : Aaaci6950Q] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, A/RFor Respondent: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT D/R
Section 201Section 250

…) has held that no separate notification is required to be issued by the Government of India in order to make the protocol applicable. And the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Steria (India) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 386 ITR 390 (Del). (2016) wherein the Hon'ble High Court has held that no separate notification is required for application of paragraph 7 of the protocol contained in Indo-France Tax Treaty. The Hon'ble Court has further held that issuance of a notification has nowhere been stipulated as a condition precedent therein. Section 90(1) of the Act is very clear…

Tdk India Private Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS, Uttar-Pradesh

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 396/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 393, 394, 395 & 396/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Tdk India Private Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Kulia Kanchrapara Road Vs Tax - Cpc, Tds P.O. Netaji Subhas Sanatorium Kalyani Nadia - 741251 [Pan : Aaaci6950Q] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, A/RFor Respondent: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT D/R
Section 201Section 250

…) has held that no separate notification is required to be issued by the Government of India in order to make the protocol applicable. And the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Steria (India) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 386 ITR 390 (Del). (2016) wherein the Hon'ble High Court has held that no separate notification is required for application of paragraph 7 of the protocol contained in Indo-France Tax Treaty. The Hon'ble Court has further held that issuance of a notification has nowhere been stipulated as a condition precedent therein. Section 90(1) of the Act is very clear…

Tdk India Private Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS, Uttar-Pradesh

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 395/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 393, 394, 395 & 396/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Tdk India Private Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Kulia Kanchrapara Road Vs Tax - Cpc, Tds P.O. Netaji Subhas Sanatorium Kalyani Nadia - 741251 [Pan : Aaaci6950Q] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, A/RFor Respondent: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT D/R
Section 201Section 250

…) has held that no separate notification is required to be issued by the Government of India in order to make the protocol applicable. And the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Steria (India) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 386 ITR 390 (Del). (2016) wherein the Hon'ble High Court has held that no separate notification is required for application of paragraph 7 of the protocol contained in Indo-France Tax Treaty. The Hon'ble Court has further held that issuance of a notification has nowhere been stipulated as a condition precedent therein. Section 90(1) of the Act is very clear…

Tdk India Private Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS, Uttar-Pradesh

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 394/KOL/2023[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jul 2023AY 2019-2020

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 393, 394, 395 & 396/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Tdk India Private Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Kulia Kanchrapara Road Vs Tax - Cpc, Tds P.O. Netaji Subhas Sanatorium Kalyani Nadia - 741251 [Pan : Aaaci6950Q] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, A/RFor Respondent: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT D/R
Section 201Section 250

…) has held that no separate notification is required to be issued by the Government of India in order to make the protocol applicable. And the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Steria (India) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 386 ITR 390 (Del). (2016) wherein the Hon'ble High Court has held that no separate notification is required for application of paragraph 7 of the protocol contained in Indo-France Tax Treaty. The Hon'ble Court has further held that issuance of a notification has nowhere been stipulated as a condition precedent therein. Section 90(1) of the Act is very clear…

Tdk India Private Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS, Uttar-Pradesh

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 393/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 393, 394, 395 & 396/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Tdk India Private Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Kulia Kanchrapara Road Vs Tax - Cpc, Tds P.O. Netaji Subhas Sanatorium Kalyani Nadia - 741251 [Pan : Aaaci6950Q] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, A/RFor Respondent: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT D/R
Section 201Section 250

…) has held that no separate notification is required to be issued by the Government of India in order to make the protocol applicable. And the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Steria (India) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 386 ITR 390 (Del). (2016) wherein the Hon'ble High Court has held that no separate notification is required for application of paragraph 7 of the protocol contained in Indo-France Tax Treaty. The Hon'ble Court has further held that issuance of a notification has nowhere been stipulated as a condition precedent therein. Section 90(1) of the Act is very clear…

Spi Global Us Inc, Puducherry vs. ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1662/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Ashik Shah, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vizay Vasanta, CIT- DR
Section 143(3)

…he service provider: i) Guy Carpenter & Co Ltd. High Court, Delhi 346 1TR 504 ii) De Beers India Minerals (P) Ltd. High Court, Karnataka 346 ITR 467 iii) US Technology Resources (P.) Ltd. High Court, Kerala 407 ITR 327 iv) Everest Global Inc. Tribunal, Delhi 194 ITD 729 v) Inter Continental Hotels Group (Asia Pacific) (Pte.) Ltd. Tribunal, Delhi 148 taxmann.com 27 vi) CPP Assistance Services (P.) Ltd Tribunal, Delhi 147 taxmann.com 484 vii) Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd Tribunal, Mumbai (Special Bench) 30 SOT 374 5.2 The Ld. AR further submitted that SPi India had sub-contracted similar e-publishing work to its ano…

Netafim Ltd., Gujarat vs. DCIT Circle- 2(2)(2), International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, appeals are allowed

ITA 366/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16

…‘IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 Netafim Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of C/o- Netafim Irrigation India Income-tax, Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.268-270, International Taxation, 271B GIDC, Manjusar, Savli, Circle 2(2)(2), Vadodara New Delhi PAN :AADCN4087C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Salil Kapoor, Advocate Sh. Ananya Kapoor, Advocate Sh. Vibhu Jain, Advocate Respondent by Sh. Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 18.05.2023 Date of pron…

Netafim Ltd., Gujarat vs. DCIT Circle- 2(2)(2), International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, appeals are allowed

ITA 1092/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16

…‘IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 Netafim Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of C/o- Netafim Irrigation India Income-tax, Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.268-270, International Taxation, 271B GIDC, Manjusar, Savli, Circle 2(2)(2), Vadodara New Delhi PAN :AADCN4087C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Salil Kapoor, Advocate Sh. Ananya Kapoor, Advocate Sh. Vibhu Jain, Advocate Respondent by Sh. Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 18.05.2023 Date of pron…