Madhu Goyal, Raipur vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Raipur
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 496/RPR/2024[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Raipur17 Apr 2025AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.496/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2014-15 Smt. Madhu Goyal D-36, Wallfort City, Bhatagaon, Raipur-492 001 (C.G) Pan: Aeypg1038E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Sakshi Gopal Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 148Section 68
…m of seeking the truth. “Reason to believe” means a situation where a person has sufficient cause to believe that something is true or false, but not otherwise. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Aryaverth Chawal Udyog, [2015] 17 SCC 324 has held that the “reasons to believe” on which the assessing authority bases its opinion must not be arbitrary, irrational, vague, distant or irrelevant. 10. Reverting to the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the “reasons to believe” itself, there is incorrect finding by the A.O regarding non-disclosure of capital gain transactions…