State Bank Of India v. CIT

389 ITR 578High Court2016#60 most cited

What is State Bank Of India v. CIT authority for?

Income arising from a cooperative society's surplus funds invested in short-term deposits and securities is not attributable to the society's core activities and, therefore, is not eligible for exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.

817

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

State Bank of India v CIT · Section 80P(2)(a)(i) · Section 80P(2)(d) · cooperative society · investment income · exemption · short-term deposits · securities · surplus funds · not business income

Also reported as

72 Taxmann.com 64241 Taxmann 163

Sections most often in play

Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(a)(i)Section 143(3)Section 80P(4)Section 80P Section 263 Section 250 Section 2(19)

Issues it is cited on

section 80(2)(d)section 80(p)(2)(d)section 2(19)section 80p(4)section 194a(3)(v)section 80p(2)(c)section 80p(2)(a)(iii)section 80p(1)section 80p(2)(d)section 194a(3)section 80p(2)(a)(i)section 80p(2)

Judgments citing State Bank Of India v. CIT

Shree Mahila Credit Souhard Sahakari Sangh Niyamit, Belagavi vs. ITO Ward 1 Belagavi, Belagavi

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 117/PAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

…low the view taken by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj), wherein it was observed that the Page 16 of 36 Akshaya Co-Op credit society Limited & others. interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments held with a cooperative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Act. 9. Be that as it may, in our considered view, as the A.O while framing the a…

Akshaya Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Karwar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Karwar

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 161/PAN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

…low the view taken by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj), wherein it was observed that the Page 16 of 36 Akshaya Co-Op credit society Limited & others. interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments held with a cooperative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Act. 9. Be that as it may, in our considered view, as the A.O while framing the a…

Akshaya Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Karwar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Karwar

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 160/PAN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

…low the view taken by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj), wherein it was observed that the Page 16 of 36 Akshaya Co-Op credit society Limited & others. interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments held with a cooperative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Act. 9. Be that as it may, in our considered view, as the A.O while framing the a…

Akshaya Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Karwar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Karwar

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 159/PAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

…low the view taken by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj), wherein it was observed that the Page 16 of 36 Akshaya Co-Op credit society Limited & others. interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments held with a cooperative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Act. 9. Be that as it may, in our considered view, as the A.O while framing the a…

Akshaya Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Karwar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Karwar

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 158/PAN/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

…low the view taken by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj), wherein it was observed that the Page 16 of 36 Akshaya Co-Op credit society Limited & others. interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments held with a cooperative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Act. 9. Be that as it may, in our considered view, as the A.O while framing the a…

Saunshi Urban Co-Op Credit Society Limited, Sanushi vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Hubli

ITA 876/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Rahul Chaudharysaunshi Urban Co-Op Credit Society Ltd. 01 Saunshi Urban Co-Op Credit Society Ltd. Market Road Saunshi Saunshi 581 117 ………. Appellant [Pan: Aaaas5548Q]

For Appellant: Ms. Harsha JFor Respondent: Sri Subramanian

Section 234BSection 250Section 270A(2)Section 56Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B’’BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Saunshi Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. 01 Saunshi Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. Market Road Saunshi Saunshi 581 117 ………. Appellant [PAN: AAAAS5548Q] Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1) Bangalore ……….. Respondent Appearance For the Appellant/Assessee : Ms. Harsha J. For the Respondent/Department : Sri Subramanian Date Conclusion of hearing : 25.11.2025 Pronouncement of order : 28.11.2025 O R D E R Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member: 1. The present appeal preferred by t…

Ahmednagar Zilla Gramsevakanchi Sahakar Patsanstha Maryadit, Ahilyanagar vs. PCIT, Pune-1, Pune

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1301/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1301/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Ahmednagar Zilla Gramsevakanchi Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, 1, Opp. Sardar Patel Karyala, Behind Vs. Ketkar Hospital, Ahilyanagar-414001 The Pr. Cit, Pune-1 Pan : Aaaaa6582G अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Department By : Date Of Hearing : Date Of Pronouncement : Shri Prasad S Bhandari Shri Amol Khairnar 11-09-2025 25-11-2025 आदेश / Order Per Astha Chandra, Jm : The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 22.03.2025 Of The Ld. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune-1 (“Pcit)” Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The “Act”) Pertaining To Assessment Year (“Ay”) 2020-21. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. On The Facts & In The Prevailing Circumstances Of The Case, Respected Pcit Pune -1 Erred Passing The Impugned Revision Order Under Section 263 Without Appreciating The Fact That Interest On The Deposits Made By A Co-Operative Society With The Co-For Operative Bank Is Eligible Deduction Under Section 80P Of The Act. Hence, The Impugned Order Under Section 263 May Please Be Squashed. 2. On The Facts & In The Prevailing Circumstances Of The Case, Respected Pcit Pune 1 Erred Passing The Impugned Revision Order Under Section 263 Without Appreciating The Submission Made By The Assessee Society & The Judgments Of Hon'Ble Jurisdictional Pune

For Appellant: Department byFor Respondent: Date of hearing

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…preative Housing Society Ltd. V/S ACIT-19(2), ITA NO.2418/Mum/2019 dated 5/3/2021 (g) Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka (h) State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj) Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat In all the above cases the respected authorities mention that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments with a co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Once the assessee has earned interest income as a part of its business activity and N.S.N…

Saini Co-Operative Tharift and Credit Society Ltd, Delhi vs. ITO Ward-48(1), Delhi

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 4261/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. V. Rajakumar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Jitender Singh, CIT-DR

Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…Court in the case of CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Federation of Housing Building Societies Ltd. [2011] 11 taxmann.com 448 (Punjab & Haryana) , the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/241 Taxman 163/389 ITR 578 (Gujarat), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mantola Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT [2014] 50 taxmann.com 278/229 Taxman 68 (Delhi), the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. [2017] 77 taxmann.com 308/245 Taxman 125/389 ITR 68 (Bombay) and t…

Saini Co-Operative Tharift and Credit Society Ltd, Delhi vs. ITO Ward-48(1), Delhi

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 4260/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. V. Rajakumar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Jitender Singh, CIT-DR

Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…Court in the case of CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Federation of Housing Building Societies Ltd. [2011] 11 taxmann.com 448 (Punjab & Haryana) , the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/241 Taxman 163/389 ITR 578 (Gujarat), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mantola Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT [2014] 50 taxmann.com 278/229 Taxman 68 (Delhi), the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. [2017] 77 taxmann.com 308/245 Taxman 125/389 ITR 68 (Bombay) and t…

Income Tax Officer, Kota vs. Kota Karamachari Sahakari Samiti Limited, Kota

Appeal is allowed

ITA 1432/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri P.C.Parwal, FCAFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Ojha, CIT

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…come from Other Sources' under Section 56 of the Income Tax Act. 1961 and was not deductible from the gross total income under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Further, Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India vs. CIT (72 Taxmann.com 64), Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of PCIT vs. Totagars (83 Taxmann.com 140) (Date of order 16.06.2017), Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the case of CIT vs. Punjab State Co-op Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. (76 Taxmann.com 307), Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of CIT vs. South Eastern Railway Employee's…

Gmedapadu Pacs, Gmedapadu vs. ITO, Ward-1, Kakinada

ITA 574/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.574/Viz/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21) G Medapadu Pacs, Vs. Income Tax Officer, East Godavari District, Ward-1, Andhra Pradesh. Kakinada. Pan: Aaaag8455A (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee By: Sri Kss Sarma, Ca राज" व "वारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of 16/10/2025 Hearing: घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 14/11/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M:

For Appellant: Sri KSS Sarma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR

Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…We further find that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj), had held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments with a co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, also makes it clear beyond 17 G MEDAPADU PACS vs. ITO any scope of doubt that the purpose be…

Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2) Pune, Pune vs. The Ammunition Factory Co Op Credit Society Limited, Pune

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 1100/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1099 & 1100/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2018-19 & 2020-21 Ito, Ward-2(2), Pune. Vs. The Ammunition Factory Co-Op. Credit Society Limited, Nehru Marg, Khadki, Pune- 411003. Pan : Aaajt0095N Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Amit Bobde & Shir Shashank Ojha Assessee By : Shri Rohit C. Kasat Date Of Hearing : 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.11.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: Both The Above Captioned Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 12.02.2025 & 28.02.2025 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Years 2018-19 & 2020-21 Respectively. 2. Since Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Revenue, Therefore, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Rohit C. KasatFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde &

Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…earned by the Cooperative Society from the investments made with the Cooperative Banks is eligible for claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act:- 1. Pr.CIT VS. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society (2017) 392ITR 74 (Karn) 2. State Bank of India vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj) 3. Lady Ratan Tower Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO in ITA No. 1152/Mum/2018 in decision dated 09.08.2018. 4. Shree Mahadeshwar Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit vs. ITO in ITA No. 374/Mum/2018 dated 06.03.2019. 5. Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Premises Co-operative Society vs. ITO in ITA No. 6547/Mum/2017 dated 25.04.2018. 6. ITO vs. M/s Oberoi…

Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2) Pune, Pune vs. The Ammunition Factory Co Op Credit Society Limited, Pune

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 1099/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1099 & 1100/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2018-19 & 2020-21 Ito, Ward-2(2), Pune. Vs. The Ammunition Factory Co-Op. Credit Society Limited, Nehru Marg, Khadki, Pune- 411003. Pan : Aaajt0095N Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Amit Bobde & Shir Shashank Ojha Assessee By : Shri Rohit C. Kasat Date Of Hearing : 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.11.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: Both The Above Captioned Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 12.02.2025 & 28.02.2025 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Years 2018-19 & 2020-21 Respectively. 2. Since Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Revenue, Therefore, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Rohit C. KasatFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde &

Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…earned by the Cooperative Society from the investments made with the Cooperative Banks is eligible for claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act:- 1. Pr.CIT VS. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society (2017) 392ITR 74 (Karn) 2. State Bank of India vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj) 3. Lady Ratan Tower Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO in ITA No. 1152/Mum/2018 in decision dated 09.08.2018. 4. Shree Mahadeshwar Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit vs. ITO in ITA No. 374/Mum/2018 dated 06.03.2019. 5. Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Premises Co-operative Society vs. ITO in ITA No. 6547/Mum/2017 dated 25.04.2018. 6. ITO vs. M/s Oberoi…

DCIT, Circle-2(1)(1), Surat vs. The Surat Vankar Sahkari Sangh Limited, Surat

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 77/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.77/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) Dcit, Vs. The Surat Vankar Sahkari Sangh Circle – 2(1)(1), Limited, Surat Opp – Reshamwala Market, Ring Road, Surat - 395002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aaaat3159L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Cit-Dr Respondent By Shri Hiren Vepari, Ca Date Of Hearing 19/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/10/2025

Section 143(2)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(1)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…) of the Act and after relying on the decision in case of Totagars’ Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. vs. ITO, Karnataka, (2010) 188 Taxman 288 (SC) and Totagars’ Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. vs. PCIT, (2017) 83 taxmann.com 143 (Karnataka), SBI vs. CIT, (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj.), Tumkur Merchants Souhardha Credit Co-operative Ltd. vs. ITO, 55 taxmann.com 447 (Kar.), Milk Producers Union Ltd. vs. CIT, TA No.473 of 2014, dated 16.06.2014 (Guj.) and some other decisions held that interests and dividend income earned by the assessee from its investment in Surat District Co-operative Bank Ltd., is not allowable u/s 80P…

Lake Florence Abcdef and G Chs Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT-41 (1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 4671/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 4670 & 4671/Mum/2025 A.Ys: 2018-19 & 2020-21 Lake Florence ABCDEF Vs DCIT-41(1)(1) & G CHS Ltd., Kautilya Bhavan, BKC Society office off ADI, Mumbai – 400051. Shankaracharya Marg, Powai, Mumbai – 400076. PAN – AAAAL2938B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Kinjal Bhuta Revenue by Shri Vikash Chandra, Addl.CIT Date of Hearing 03.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement 31.10.2025 ORDER PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM: These two appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the different impugned orders passed…

Lake Florence Abcdef and G Chs Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT-41 (1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 4670/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 4670 & 4671/Mum/2025 A.Ys: 2018-19 & 2020-21 Lake Florence ABCDEF Vs DCIT-41(1)(1) & G CHS Ltd., Kautilya Bhavan, BKC Society office off ADI, Mumbai – 400051. Shankaracharya Marg, Powai, Mumbai – 400076. PAN – AAAAL2938B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Kinjal Bhuta Revenue by Shri Vikash Chandra, Addl.CIT Date of Hearing 03.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement 31.10.2025 ORDER PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM: These two appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the different impugned orders passed…

Vasai Urban Cooperative C Redit Society Ltd, Vasai vs. PCIT-1, Thane

In the result, the appeal by the assessee allowed

ITA 2622/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (Accountant Member), MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Perampurna (CIT-DR)

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

…ion 80P(2)(d) of the Act, by observing as under:- "7. Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in case of Pr. CIT & Anr. Vs. Totgar's Co- operative Sale Society Ltd. (2017) 292 ITR 74 (Kar.) and Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in case of State Bank of India vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj.) had also held that interest Income earned by a co-operative society on its investment held with co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. We are of the considered view that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the denial of deduction by the AO to the assessee under section 80P(2)(d) of…

Elco Arcade Res and Non Res. Premises Co Op Society Limited, Mumbai vs. ITO Ward 23(1)(3), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposesin above terms

ITA 4481/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shriom Prakash Kant & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanelco Arcade Res & Non Res Ito 23(1)(3), Premisies Co-Operative Society Vs. Piramal Chamber, Ltd. Mumbai – 400 012 Elco Arcade, Hill Road, Bandra West, Mumbai-400 050 Pan: Aaaae8544N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shripratik Jain, Ld. Ar Department Represented By : Shri Pushkarajbhangepatil, Ld. Dr Date Of Conclusion Of Hearing : 13.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.09.2025

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…ataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had held, that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments with a co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006 also makes it clear beyond any scope of doubt that the purpose behind enact…

Shree Datta Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha, Sangli vs. ITO Ward-5, Sangli

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AY 2018-19 (ITA

ITA 626/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sarang S. GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 56Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “ए” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.626 & 625/PUN/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2018-19 & 2020-21 Shree Datta Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha, ITO, Ward-5, Sangli Urun, Islampur, Sangli-415409 Vs. PAN : AAAAS8250R अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Sarang S. Gudhate Department by : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date of hearing : 15-07-2025 Date of 22-09-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / ORDER PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM : The above t…

Shree Datta Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha, Sangli vs. ITO Ward-5, Sangli

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AY 2018-19 (ITA

ITA 625/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sarang S. GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 56Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “ए” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.626 & 625/PUN/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2018-19 & 2020-21 Shree Datta Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha, ITO, Ward-5, Sangli Urun, Islampur, Sangli-415409 Vs. PAN : AAAAS8250R अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Sarang S. Gudhate Department by : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date of hearing : 15-07-2025 Date of 22-09-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / ORDER PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM : The above t…