State Bank of India v. CIT

290 CTR 129Reported decision#9871 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Sections most often in play

Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)Section 143(3)Section 143(1)Section 80P(2)(a)(i)Section 144B Section 154 Section 2(19)

Issues it is cited on

section 56(i)(ccv)section 80p(4)section 2(19)section 80p(2)(d)mistake apparent from record section 80p(2)(a)(i)section 80p(2)(a)section 80p(2)section 80p section 56 gross total income income-tax officer

Judgments citing State Bank of India v. CIT

ELCO ARCADE RES AND NON RES. PREMISES CO OP SOCIETY LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 23(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposesin above terms

ITA 4481/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shriom Prakash Kant & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanelco Arcade Res & Non Res Ito 23(1)(3), Premisies Co-Operative Society Vs. Piramal Chamber, Ltd. Mumbai – 400 012 Elco Arcade, Hill Road, Bandra West, Mumbai-400 050 Pan: Aaaae8544N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shripratik Jain, Ld. Ar Department Represented By : Shri Pushkarajbhangepatil, Ld. Dr Date Of Conclusion Of Hearing : 13.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.09.2025

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…ourt of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had held, that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments with a co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006 also makes it clear beyond any scope of doubt that the purpose…

MULUND SAMATA CO-OP HSG SOC LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-41(2)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6432/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri Ashutosh Patare, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Nihar Ranjan Samal, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 249Section 3Section 5Section 80P(2)(d)

…er of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society 9 Mulund Samata Coop Hsg Soc Ltd., AY 2021-22 [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had also held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments held with a co- operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, as had been relied upon by the ld. A.R, also makes i…

SAMARTH SURKSHA RAKSHAK CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,SANPADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5497/MUM/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 May 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Prashant Ghumare, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Nihar Ranjan Samal, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(i)

…and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society Samarth Surksha Co-op Credit Soc Ltd., AYs 2018-19 and 2020-21 [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had also held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments held with a co- operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, as had been relied upon by the ld. A.R, also makes i…

SAMARTH SURKSHA RAKSHAK CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,SANPADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5496/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Prashant Ghumare, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Nihar Ranjan Samal, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(i)

PATHARE PRABHU COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 591/MUM/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Prashant Chapekar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Nihar Ranjan Samal, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…ourt of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had also held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments held with a co- operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, as had been relied upon by the ld. A.R, also makes i…

NITYANAND BAUG CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA 2209/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Br Baskaran & Shri. Raj Kumar Chauhannityanand Baug Co-Operative Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Society Limited Income Tax Plot No. 80/83, Nity Anand Baug, R. Tower No. 6, Vashi Railway C. Marg, Chembur, Mumbai – 400 Station, Commercial Complex, 074. Vashi Navi Mumbai – 400 Pan: Aaaan6410C 703. (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

SILVER SAND COOP HOUSING SOC LTD,GOREGAON (WEST) vs. ACIT (CPC), BENGALORE

In the result, captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1598/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai11 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Ravindra Poojari, A/RFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. D/R

Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…ourt of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had also held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments held with a co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, as had been relied upon by the ld. A.R, also makes it…

SILVER SAND COOP HOUSING SOC LTD,GOREGAON (WEST) vs. ACIT (CPC) BENGALORE, BENGALORE

In the result, captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1597/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai11 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Ravindra Poojari, A/RFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. D/R

Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…ourt of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had also held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments held with a co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, as had been relied upon by the ld. A.R, also makes it…

SILVER SAND COOP HOUSING SOC LTD ,GOREGAON (WEST) vs. ACIT ( CPC) BENGALORE, BENGALORE

In the result, captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1596/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai11 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Ravindra Poojari, A/RFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. D/R

Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…ourt of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had also held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments held with a co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, as had been relied upon by the ld. A.R, also makes it…

RAJAT APARTMENTS CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 19(3), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4329/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai27 May 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Girish Agrawal & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

For Appellant: Shri Jayesh Dadia, C.A RevenueFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 56Section 80P(2)(d)

…ourt of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had also held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments held with a co- operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, as had been relied upon by the ld. A.R, also makes i…

RAJAT APARTMENTS CO.OP. HOUSING SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 19(3), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4328/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai27 May 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Girish Agrawal & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

For Appellant: Shri Jayesh Dadia, C.A RevenueFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 56Section 80P(2)(d)

…ourt of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank of India v. CIT [2016] 72 taxmann.com 64/290 CTR 129/389 ITR 578/241 Taxman 163 (Gujarat), had also held that the interest income earned by the assessee on its investments held with a co- operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Still further, we find that the CBDT Circular No. 14, dated 28.12.2006, as had been relied upon by the ld. A.R, also makes i…