Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum)

JOHN DISTILLERIES PVT LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…y him is within the provisions of law, and nothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we uphold the same. 13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum) (2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under: “18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before us. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial pronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in appellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him in…

JOHN DISTILLERIES PVT LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

…im is within the provisions of law, and\nnothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we\nuphold the same.\n13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.”\n20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum)\n(2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under:\n“18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before\nus. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial\npronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in\nappellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him…

JOHN DISTILLERIES PVT LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

…im is within the provisions of law, and\nnothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we\nuphold the same.\n13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.”\n20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum)\n(2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under:\n“18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before\nus. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial\npronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in\nappellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him…

JOHN DEVELOPERS ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…y him is within the provisions of law, and nothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we uphold the same. 13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum) (2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under: “18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before us. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial pronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in appellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him in…

JOHN DEVELOPERS ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

…by him is within the provisions of law, and nothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we uphold the same. 13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum) (2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under: “18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before us. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial pronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in appellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him in…

JOHN DEVELOPERS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…y him is within the provisions of law, and nothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we uphold the same. 13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum) (2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under: “18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before us. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial pronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in appellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him in…

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…y him is within the provisions of law, and nothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we uphold the same. 13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum) (2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under: “18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before us. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial pronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in appellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him in…

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1) , BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…y him is within the provisions of law, and nothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we uphold the same. 13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum) (2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under: “18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before us. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial pronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in appellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him in…

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…y him is within the provisions of law, and nothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we uphold the same. 13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum) (2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under: “18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before us. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial pronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in appellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him in…

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

…y him is within the provisions of law, and nothing wrong therein could be pointed out by the ld. DR, and therefore, we uphold the same. 13. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 20.25 In the case of Srikanth G. Shah v. ITO (ITAT Mum) (2008) (300 ITR 324) (AT) it was held as under: “18. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions made before us. We have also carefully gone through the relevant facts and the judicial pronouncements cited before us. In our view, the grounds raised by the assessee in appellate proceedings to the effect that the interest income disclosed by him in…