Spectra Shares and Scrips Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (AP)

354 ITR 35High Court2013#1552 most cited

What is Spectra Shares and Scrips Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (AP) authority for?

The Commissioner can exercise revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act only if the Assessing Officer's order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, requiring satisfaction of these twin conditions.

73

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2013 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Spectra Shares and Scrips · Section 263 · revisionary powers · Commissioner · CIT · erroneous and prejudicial · twin conditions · lack of enquiry · inadequate enquiry · non-application of mind · Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. · Section 143(3)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Spectra Shares and Scrips Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (AP)

Hill Queen Investment Pvt. Ltd, Kolkata vs. PCIT-2, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 643/KOL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Apr 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri Aby T. Varkey, Hon’Ble) Assessment Year: 2015-16 Hill Queen Investment (P) Ltd...……………………....................................……………..…….............Appellant Surobala Apartments Flat No. 202 3Rd Floor Block-B Rekhjuani, Bhatinda Rajarhat Kolkata – 700 135 [Pan : Aaacj 2324 P] Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Kolkata..................…………...............................…......Respondent Appearances By: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Devi Sharan Singh, Cit, D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 6Th, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 21St, 2021 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :- This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 2, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”), Passed U/S. 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The ‘Act’), Dt. 20/03/2020, For The Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. There Is A Delay Of 223 (Two Hundred Twenty Three) Days In Filing Of This Appeal By The Assessee. After Perusing The Petition For Condonation For Delay, We Are Convinced That The Assessee Was Prevented By Sufficient Cause In Filing The Appeal In Time. Hence, We Condone The Delay & Admit The Appeal. 3. The Assessee Is A Company & Filed Its Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2015-16, Disclosing Total Income Of Rs.20,40,470/- On 28/09/2015. The Case Was Selected For Limited Scrutiny For The Following Reasons:- “(I) Mismatch In Sales Turnover Reported In Audit Report & Itr (Ii) Mismatch In Amount Paid To Related Persons U/S 40A(2)(B) Reported In Audit Report & Itr (Iii) Suspicious Sale Transaction In Shares (Penny Stock Tab In Its)”

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40A(2)(b)

…one’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Spectra Shares and the Act. The Hone’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Spectra Shares and the Act. The Hone’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Spectra Shares and Scrips Pvt. Ltd. V CIT (AP) 354 ITR 35 had considered a number of judgments on Scrips Pvt. Ltd. V CIT (AP) 354 ITR 35 had considered a number of judgments on Scrips Pvt. Ltd. V CIT (AP) 354 ITR 35 had considered a number of judgments on 7 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Hill Queen Investment (P) Ltd. this issue of exercise of jurisdiciton u/s 263 of the Act by the Principal this issue of exe…