Southern Switchgear Ltd. v. CIT (supra). Again

55 Taxmann.com 230High Court2015#10669 most cited

What is Southern Switchgear Ltd. v. CIT (supra). Again authority for?

Payment of royalty for the right to use or access technical know-how and information is revenue expenditure. This applies even when the know-how provides benefits of an enduring nature.

10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2024.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Hero Honda Motors Ltd · Southern Switchgear Ltd · royalty payment · revenue expenditure · technical know-how · enduring benefit · section 37(1) · business deduction

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Southern Switchgear Ltd. v. CIT (supra). Again

Heidelberg Cement India Ltd., Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Gurgaon

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2054/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2011-12 Heidelberg Cement India Ltd., Vs Dcit, 9Th Floor, Tower-C, Circle-2, 3Rd Floor, Infinity Towers, Dlf Cyber City, Vanijya Nikunj, Gurgaon. Hsiidc Building, Udyog Vihar, Ph. V, Pan: Aabcm2359J Near Shankar Chowk, Nh-8, Gurgaon. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Deepak Chopra, Advocate & Sh. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocate Revenue By : Ms Ashima Neb, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 28.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.10.2019 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 1St February, 2016 Of The Cit(A)-1, Gurgaon, Relating To Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Grounds Of Appeal No. 1 & 1.1 Raised By The Read As Under:- “1. The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred On Facts & In Law, In Confirming The Disallowance Made By The Ld. Ao, Amounting To Inr 87,12,690/-, On Account Of Additional Depreciation Claimed By The Appellant On New Plant & Machinery In Accordance With The Provisions Of Section 32(I)(Iia) Of The Act. 1.1 The Ld. Cit(A) / Ld. Ao Erred On Facts & In Law, In Considering Only The Nomenclature Of The Assets To Hold The Disallowance, Without Appreciating The Detailed Nature & Use Of The Assets.”

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Chopra, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Ashima Neb, Sr. DR
Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Heidelberg Cement India Ltd., Vs DCIT, 9th Floor, Tower-C, Circle-2, 3rd Floor, Infinity Towers, DLF Cyber City, Vanijya Nikunj, Gurgaon. HSIIDC Building, Udyog Vihar, Ph. V, PAN: AABCM2359J Near Shankar Chowk, NH-8, Gurgaon. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Deepak Chopra, Advocate & Sh. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocate Revenue by : Ms Ashima Neb, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 28.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 31.10.2019 ORDER PER R.K.…

Southern Switchgear Ltd. v. CIT (supra). Again (55 Taxmann.com 230) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax