Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT

374 ITR 118High Court2015#139 most cited

What is Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

The existence of an international transaction for Advertising and Marketing Promotion (AMP) expenditure requires the revenue to discharge the burden of proof. An explanation inserted under Section 92B does not automatically make AMP expenditure an international transaction.

499

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT · 374 ITR 118 · Section 92B · AMP expenditure · international transaction · bright line test · burden of proof · revenue

Also reported as

2015 SCC OnLine DEL 8083

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT

Nikon India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Gurgaon

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 789/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Sept 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri A.T. Varkeyita No.789/Del./2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) M/S. Nikon India (Pvt.) Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle-3 Plot No. 17, Sec-32, Gurgaon. Institutional Area Gurgaon. (Pan No: Aaccn5100F) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : S/Shri Mukesh Butani & Gourav Gupta, Advocates S/Shri Suchint Majmuder & Nipun Arora, Cas Revenue By : Shri Anurag Sharma, Senior Dr Date Of Hearing : 02.07.2015 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.09.2015 O R D E R Per A.T. Varkey: This Appeal By The Assessee Under Section 253(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Directed Against The Final Order Passed By The Transfer Pricing Officer (Tpo) / Assessing Officer (Ao) On 05.01.2015 U/S 143(3) Read With Section 144C Of The Income-Tax

For Appellant: S/Shri Mukesh Butani & Gourav Gupta, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri Anurag Sharma, Senior DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 253(1)Section 92C(2)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘I-2’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.789/Del./2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11) M/s. Nikon India (Pvt.) Ltd., vs. DCIT, Circle-3 Plot No. 17, Sec-32, Gurgaon. Institutional Area GURGAON. (PAN NO: AACCN5100F) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : S/Shri Mukesh Butani & Gourav Gupta, Advocates S/Shri Suchint Majmuder & Nipun Arora, CAs REVENUE BY : Shri Anurag Sharma, Senior DR Date of Hearing : 02.07.2015 Date of Pronouncement : 28.09.2015 O R D E R PER A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER : This appeal b…