Vineetsingh Gulabsingh Rore, Ahmedabad vs. The PCIT, Ahmedabad-1, Ahmedabad
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed
ITA 868/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)
For Appellant: Shri Sunil Maloo, ARFor Respondent: Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, CIT.DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 253(5)Section 263Section 69
…t cause for condoning the delay in filing appeal. In other words, a cause should not be dismissed due to ill-advice given by the counsel. The following case laws support this proposition: i) Concord Ins Vs. Nirmaladevi, 118 ITR 507 (SC) ii) IAC Vs. Kedarnath, 133 ITR 746 iii) Arun Vs. Twigg, 153 ITR 131 ITA No.868/Ahd/2023 [Vineetsingh Gulabsingh Rore vs. PCIT] A.Y. 2017-18 - 11 – iv) Avtar Vs. CIT, 133 ITR 338 Also there is no benefit accruing to the assessee by not filing appeal in the first instance itself but on the contrary the assessee has been inflicted with serious consequences of huge demand raised on…