Smt. Neena Syal v. ACIT

93 Taxmann.com 275High Court2018#2293 most cited

What is Smt. Neena Syal v. ACIT authority for?

CBDT guidelines are not a fixed yardstick for determining the value of jewellery a person can possess, but rather general guidelines for a person of reasonable income.

50

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Smt. Neena Syal v. ACIT · CBDT guidelines · jewellery · family status · past income · unexplaned jewellery · section 143(3) · section 69A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Smt. Neena Syal v. ACIT

Rakesh Bansal, Barnala vs. ACIT, CC-II, Chandigarh

ITA 110/CHANDI/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: 22.05.2018. Iii). The Appeals Were Filed As Per Above Notice On 04.02.2019. 2. It Is Submitted That In The Above Said Case, The Appeals Were Prepared On 10Th Of April 2018 & Even The Fee For Filing The Appeals Were Deposited On 16.04.2018, But The Appeals Were Inadvertently Filed In The Office Of The Cit, Pr On 17.04.2018 As Per Necessary Evidence Being Enclosed Herewith In The Form Of Receipt Evidencing The Fact That The Appeals Were Filed On 17.04.2018 In The Office Of The Cit(Dr) Itat.

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Krishan Kumar, CITDR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “बी” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH "ी एन.के.सैनी, उपा"य" एवं "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. N.K.SAINI, VP & SHRI , SANJAY GARG, JM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 110/Chd/ 2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Shri Rakesh Bansal The Asstt. CIT बनाम S/o Shri Banarsi Dass Bansal Central Circle-II, Chandigarh C/o Barnala Filling Station Dhanuala Road, Barnala "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ABMPB5910H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Krish…