Smt. Abha Bansal v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax

132 Taxmann.com 231High Court2021#2434 most cited

What is Smt. Abha Bansal v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax authority for?

Compensation received by an assessee upon cancellation of a Builder-Buyer Agreement constitutes a capital receipt and is taxable as capital gains. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax cannot revise an assessment where the Assessing Officer has correctly treated such compensation as capital gains.

47

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Smt. Abha Bansal · 132 Taxmann.com 231 · Section 263 · capital gains · compensation · builder-buyer agreement cancellation · capital receipt · revision by PCIT · erroneous and prejudicial · Delhi ITAT

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 80IC

Issues it is cited on

section 44aesection 153(a)revision u/s 263section 80icsection 254(1)section 153dkelvinatorerroneous and prejudicialsection 144asection 65bsection 44asection 254

Judgments citing Smt. Abha Bansal v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax

Ganadhipati Construction Private Limited, Patna vs. PCIT, Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing

ITA 359/PAT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna16 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…ITA Nos. 356 to 360/PAT/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-2018to 2021-2022 Gandhipati Construction Private Limited IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA [Hybrid Court Hearing] Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ) & Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member I.T.A. Nos. 356, 357, 358, 359 & 360/PAT/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-2018to 2021-2022 Gandhipati Construction Private Limited,… Appellant 401B, Capital Tower, Block-‘B’, Fraser Road, Patna-800001, Bihar [PAN:AADCM2976R] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,..…Respondent Central, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path,…

Ganadhipati Construction Private Limited, Patna vs. PCIT, Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing

ITA 358/PAT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Patna16 Oct 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…ITA Nos. 356 to 360/PAT/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-2018to 2021-2022 Gandhipati Construction Private Limited IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA [Hybrid Court Hearing] Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ) & Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member I.T.A. Nos. 356, 357, 358, 359 & 360/PAT/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-2018to 2021-2022 Gandhipati Construction Private Limited,… Appellant 401B, Capital Tower, Block-‘B’, Fraser Road, Patna-800001, Bihar [PAN:AADCM2976R] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,..…Respondent Central, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path,…

Ganadhipati Construction Pvt Ltd, Patna vs. PCIT, Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing

ITA 357/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna16 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…ITA Nos. 356 to 360/PAT/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-2018to 2021-2022 Gandhipati Construction Private Limited IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA [Hybrid Court Hearing] Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ) & Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member I.T.A. Nos. 356, 357, 358, 359 & 360/PAT/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-2018to 2021-2022 Gandhipati Construction Private Limited,… Appellant 401B, Capital Tower, Block-‘B’, Fraser Road, Patna-800001, Bihar [PAN:AADCM2976R] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,..…Respondent Central, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path,…

Ganadhipati Construction Private Limited, Patna vs. PCIT, Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing

ITA 356/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna16 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…ITA Nos. 356 to 360/PAT/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-2018to 2021-2022 Gandhipati Construction Private Limited IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA [Hybrid Court Hearing] Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ) & Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member I.T.A. Nos. 356, 357, 358, 359 & 360/PAT/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-2018to 2021-2022 Gandhipati Construction Private Limited,… Appellant 401B, Capital Tower, Block-‘B’, Fraser Road, Patna-800001, Bihar [PAN:AADCM2976R] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,..…Respondent Central, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path,…

Vijay Kumar Bhan, Thane vs. ITO-Cir-42(3)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1799/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm Vijay Kumar Bhan Ito Circle 42(3)(1) Flat No. 602, Surbharlokpuram, Kautilya Bhavan, Bkc, Bandra E, Hiranandani Meadows, Thane (W), Vs. Mumbai-400 051 Thane – 400 610

For Appellant: Shri Dinesh R ShahFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Kumar
Section 143(1)Section 2Section 250Section 56(2)(x)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, AM AND MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM Vijay Kumar Bhan ITO Circle 42(3)(1) Flat No. 602, SurbharLokpuram, Kautilya Bhavan, BKC, Bandra E, Hiranandani Meadows, Thane (W), Vs. Mumbai-400 051 Thane – 400 610 PAN/GIR No. ADWPB 4530 F (Assessee) (Respondent) : Assessee by : Shri Dinesh R Shah Respondent by : Shri Ashish Kumar Date of Hearing : 27.06.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 24.09.2024 O R D E R Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M: This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (…

Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd, Patna vs. Pr. CIT Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 329/PAT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member I.T.A. Nos.322 to 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd. ………. Appellant (PAN: AACCN6360K) Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Patna …… Respondent Appearances by: Shri Siddarth Jhajharia, CA, Shri Sunil Kr. Dubey, Advocate & Shri Aman Kr. Dubey, Advocate appeared for Appellant. Shri Rinku Singh, CIT, DR appeared for Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : 24.07.2024 Date of pronouncing the order : 12.09.2024 ORDER Per Ben…

Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd, Patna vs. Pr. CIT Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 328/PAT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member I.T.A. Nos.322 to 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd. ………. Appellant (PAN: AACCN6360K) Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Patna …… Respondent Appearances by: Shri Siddarth Jhajharia, CA, Shri Sunil Kr. Dubey, Advocate & Shri Aman Kr. Dubey, Advocate appeared for Appellant. Shri Rinku Singh, CIT, DR appeared for Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : 24.07.2024 Date of pronouncing the order : 12.09.2024 ORDER Per Ben…

Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd, Patna vs. Pr. CIT Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 327/PAT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member I.T.A. Nos.322 to 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd. ………. Appellant (PAN: AACCN6360K) Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Patna …… Respondent Appearances by: Shri Siddarth Jhajharia, CA, Shri Sunil Kr. Dubey, Advocate & Shri Aman Kr. Dubey, Advocate appeared for Appellant. Shri Rinku Singh, CIT, DR appeared for Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : 24.07.2024 Date of pronouncing the order : 12.09.2024 ORDER Per Ben…

Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd, Patna vs. Pr. CIT Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 326/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member I.T.A. Nos.322 to 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd. ………. Appellant (PAN: AACCN6360K) Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Patna …… Respondent Appearances by: Shri Siddarth Jhajharia, CA, Shri Sunil Kr. Dubey, Advocate & Shri Aman Kr. Dubey, Advocate appeared for Appellant. Shri Rinku Singh, CIT, DR appeared for Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : 24.07.2024 Date of pronouncing the order : 12.09.2024 ORDER Per Ben…

Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd, Patna vs. Pr. CIT Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 325/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member I.T.A. Nos.322 to 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd. ………. Appellant (PAN: AACCN6360K) Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Patna …… Respondent Appearances by: Shri Siddarth Jhajharia, CA, Shri Sunil Kr. Dubey, Advocate & Shri Aman Kr. Dubey, Advocate appeared for Appellant. Shri Rinku Singh, CIT, DR appeared for Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : 24.07.2024 Date of pronouncing the order : 12.09.2024 ORDER Per Ben…

Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd, Patna vs. Pr. CIT Central, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 323/PAT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member I.T.A. Nos.322 to 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd. ………. Appellant (PAN: AACCN6360K) Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Patna …… Respondent Appearances by: Shri Siddarth Jhajharia, CA, Shri Sunil Kr. Dubey, Advocate & Shri Aman Kr. Dubey, Advocate appeared for Appellant. Shri Rinku Singh, CIT, DR appeared for Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : 24.07.2024 Date of pronouncing the order : 12.09.2024 ORDER Per Ben…

Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd, Patna vs. Pr. CIT (Central), Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 322/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member I.T.A. Nos.322 to 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Nalanda Engicon Pvt. Ltd. ………. Appellant (PAN: AACCN6360K) Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Patna …… Respondent Appearances by: Shri Siddarth Jhajharia, CA, Shri Sunil Kr. Dubey, Advocate & Shri Aman Kr. Dubey, Advocate appeared for Appellant. Shri Rinku Singh, CIT, DR appeared for Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : 24.07.2024 Date of pronouncing the order : 12.09.2024 ORDER Per Ben…

Devender Kumar Gupta, New Delhi vs. PCIT, Central, Gurgaon

The appeals are allowed and the impugned orders in respective years are quashed

ITA 1891/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.1890 To 1893/Del/2024 Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, CA &For Respondent: Shri T. James Singson, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 153DSection 263Section 263ASection 40A(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITAs No.1890 to 1893/Del/2024 Assessment Years: 2015-16 to 2018-19 Devender Kumar Gupta, Vs PCIT, Central, C/o M/s Raj Kumar & Associates, Gurgaon. C-7A, LGF, South Ext. Part-2, New Delhi – 110 049. PAN: AAVPK4675Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, CA & Shri J.P. Sharma, CA Revenue by : Shri T. James Singson, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 28.08.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 30.08.2024 ORDER PER BENCH: These are appeals preferred by th…

Devender Kumar Gupta, New Delhi vs. PCIT Central, Gurgaon

The appeals are allowed and the impugned orders in respective years are quashed

ITA 1890/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.1890 To 1893/Del/2024 Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, CA &For Respondent: Shri T. James Singson, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 153DSection 263Section 263ASection 40A(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITAs No.1890 to 1893/Del/2024 Assessment Years: 2015-16 to 2018-19 Devender Kumar Gupta, Vs PCIT, Central, C/o M/s Raj Kumar & Associates, Gurgaon. C-7A, LGF, South Ext. Part-2, New Delhi – 110 049. PAN: AAVPK4675Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, CA & Shri J.P. Sharma, CA Revenue by : Shri T. James Singson, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 28.08.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 30.08.2024 ORDER PER BENCH: These are appeals preferred by th…

Gyan Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd, Varanasi vs. ACIT Central Circle-03, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 178/PAT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 175 To 178/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 To 2018-19 Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited Principal Commissioner Of Awlespur, Kandwa Vs Income-Tax (Central), Patna Varanasi - 221006 [Pan: Aaecg0509Mc] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv. Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/05/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per, Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate & Identical Orders Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”) Even Dt. 26/03/2022, Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2015-16 To 2018-19. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 14 Days In Filing Of These Appeals. There Is A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Stating Therein, The Reasons For The Delay. Relevant Content Of The Petition Dt. 08/06/2023 Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “…….. 1. That We Had Received An Order U/S 263 Passed By Id Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Circle, Patna On 26.03.2022. 2

For Appellant: Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, AdvFor Respondent: Md. A.H. Chowdhary, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 133ASection 153ASection 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “पटना“ "यायपीठ पटना IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA (Heard from Kolkata Benches through web-based video conferencing platform) ] ] SHRI DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & BEFORE SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 175 to 178/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 to 2018-19 Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited Principal Commissioner of Awlespur, Kandwa Vs Income-tax (Central), Patna Varanasi - 221006 [PAN: AAECG0509MC] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv. Revenue by : Md. A…

Gyan Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd, Varanasi vs. ACIT Central Circle-03, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 177/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 175 To 178/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 To 2018-19 Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited Principal Commissioner Of Awlespur, Kandwa Vs Income-Tax (Central), Patna Varanasi - 221006 [Pan: Aaecg0509Mc] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv. Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/05/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per, Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate & Identical Orders Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”) Even Dt. 26/03/2022, Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2015-16 To 2018-19. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 14 Days In Filing Of These Appeals. There Is A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Stating Therein, The Reasons For The Delay. Relevant Content Of The Petition Dt. 08/06/2023 Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “…….. 1. That We Had Received An Order U/S 263 Passed By Id Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Circle, Patna On 26.03.2022. 2

For Appellant: Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, AdvFor Respondent: Md. A.H. Chowdhary, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 133ASection 153ASection 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “पटना“ "यायपीठ पटना IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA (Heard from Kolkata Benches through web-based video conferencing platform) ] ] SHRI DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & BEFORE SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 175 to 178/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 to 2018-19 Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited Principal Commissioner of Awlespur, Kandwa Vs Income-tax (Central), Patna Varanasi - 221006 [PAN: AAECG0509MC] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv. Revenue by : Md. A…

Gyan Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd, Varanasi vs. ACIT Central Circle-03, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 176/PAT/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 175 To 178/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 To 2018-19 Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited Principal Commissioner Of Awlespur, Kandwa Vs Income-Tax (Central), Patna Varanasi - 221006 [Pan: Aaecg0509Mc] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv. Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/05/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per, Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate & Identical Orders Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”) Even Dt. 26/03/2022, Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2015-16 To 2018-19. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 14 Days In Filing Of These Appeals. There Is A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Stating Therein, The Reasons For The Delay. Relevant Content Of The Petition Dt. 08/06/2023 Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “…….. 1. That We Had Received An Order U/S 263 Passed By Id Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Circle, Patna On 26.03.2022. 2

For Appellant: Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, AdvFor Respondent: Md. A.H. Chowdhary, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 133ASection 153ASection 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “पटना“ "यायपीठ पटना IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA (Heard from Kolkata Benches through web-based video conferencing platform) ] ] SHRI DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & BEFORE SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 175 to 178/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 to 2018-19 Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited Principal Commissioner of Awlespur, Kandwa Vs Income-tax (Central), Patna Varanasi - 221006 [PAN: AAECG0509MC] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv. Revenue by : Md. A…

Gyan Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd, Varanasi vs. ACIT Central Circle-03, Patna

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 175/PAT/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 175 To 178/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 To 2018-19 Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited Principal Commissioner Of Awlespur, Kandwa Vs Income-Tax (Central), Patna Varanasi - 221006 [Pan: Aaecg0509Mc] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv. Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/05/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per, Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate & Identical Orders Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”) Even Dt. 26/03/2022, Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2015-16 To 2018-19. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 14 Days In Filing Of These Appeals. There Is A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Stating Therein, The Reasons For The Delay. Relevant Content Of The Petition Dt. 08/06/2023 Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “…….. 1. That We Had Received An Order U/S 263 Passed By Id Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Circle, Patna On 26.03.2022. 2

For Appellant: Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, AdvFor Respondent: Md. A.H. Chowdhary, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 133ASection 153ASection 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “पटना“ "यायपीठ पटना IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA (Heard from Kolkata Benches through web-based video conferencing platform) ] ] SHRI DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & BEFORE SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 175 to 178/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 to 2018-19 Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited Principal Commissioner of Awlespur, Kandwa Vs Income-tax (Central), Patna Varanasi - 221006 [PAN: AAECG0509MC] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S.C. Aggrawal, Sr. Adv. & Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv. Revenue by : Md. A…

M/S. Rdc Ventures, Mumbai vs. PCIT-27, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1915/MUM/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amarjit Singhm/S Rdc Ventures Vs. Principal Commissioner Office No.-110 Of Income Tax-27 Ridhhisidhhi Premises Room No. 401, 4 Th Floor, Society, Near Sahakar Tower No. 6, Vashi Talkies Tilak Nagar, Railway Station, Chembur (West) Mumbai- Commercial Complex, 400089 Vashi, Navi Mumbai -400703 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aakfr0914Q Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Dhran Gandhi Respondent By : Sanyogita Nagpal Date Of Hearing 29.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 09.02.2024

For Appellant: Dhran GandhiFor Respondent: Sanyogita Nagpal
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…P a g e | 1 M/s RDC Ventures Vs. Pr.CIT-27 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M/s RDC Ventures Vs. Principal Commissioner Office No.-110 of Income Tax-27 RidhhiSidhhi Premises Room No. 401, 4 th Floor, Society, Near Sahakar Tower No. 6, Vashi Talkies Tilak Nagar, Railway Station, Chembur (West) Mumbai- Commercial Complex, 400089 Vashi, Navi Mumbai -400703 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No:AAKFR0914Q Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Dhran Gandhi Respondent by : Sanyogita Nagpal Date of Hearing 29.1…

Bhupinder Singh Julka, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Circle-Int. Tax. 2(1)(2), Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1807/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 234BSection 80T

…nder section 2 (28A) of the Act can have no application to such payments. Consequently, there was no obligation on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at source and consequently no disallowance could have been made under section 40 (a) (ia) of the Act. ii) 132 Taxmann.com 231 (Delhi- Trib.) Smt. Abha Bansal vs. The Pr. CIT (Central), Gurgaon 9.12 It is clear that the compensation received by the assessee on cancellation of the Builder-Buyer Agreement is capital receipt and taxable as capital gains. The view of the A.O. was, therefore, in accordance with Law and cannot be impeached by the Learned PCIT. In view…