Skyline Caterers (P.) Ltd. v. ITO

20 SOT 266Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2008#23448 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 341,001 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Judgments citing Skyline Caterers (P.) Ltd. v. ITO

M/S Bosch Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Ltu Circle-1, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1629/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2013-14 Bosch Limited, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Hosur Road, Adugodi, Of Income Tax, Ltu, Bangalore – 560 030. Circle 1, Pan: Aaacm 9840P Bangalore. Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Percy Pardiwala, Advocate Respondent By : Shri V S Chakrapani, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 01.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.09.2022 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S.2. This Appeal Is Against The Order Of The Cit(Appeals), Bangalore-9, Bangalore Dated 31.3.2018 For The Assessment Year 2013- 14. 3. The Assessee Raised Grounds Pertaining To The Following Issues:- Deduction U/S. 35(2Ab) Computed On Net Expenditure As Opposed To Gross Expenditure Disallowance Of Provision For Bad & Doubtful Debts I) Disallowance Of Provision For Long Term Service Award Disallowance Of Expenditure U/S. 14A Of The Act Ii) Page 2 Of 67

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri V S Chakrapani, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 14ASection 35Section 37Section 43BSection 80J

…rightly urged by the Ld. A.R, the earlier Bench in its wisdom, on a similar issue for the AY 2004-05 in ITA No.329/B/09 dated: 31.8.2009 in the assessee's own case, by extensively quoting the finding of the Hon'ble ITAT, Mumbai Bench 'SMC' reported in (2008) 20 SOT 266 (Mum), had arrived at a conclusion that the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on 'business information' under the category of 'other identifiable intangibles [goodwill]. (e) Applying the same ratio, we are of the firm view that the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on intangible assets. It is ordered accordingly.” 90. We find i…

Skyline Caterers (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (20 SOT 266) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax