Sky Builders and Developers v. ITO 1(1), Bhopal

14 Taxmann.com 78Reported decision2011#10160 most cited

What is Sky Builders and Developers v. ITO 1(1), Bhopal authority for?

An assessee is not eligible for deduction under section 80-IB(10) if it acts merely as a contractor and not a developer. This is the case where the assessee sells plots to customers, registers sale deeds, and subsequently constructs buildings at an agreed price, indicating it did not fulfill the developer role.

10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Sky Builders & Developers v. ITO · section 80-IB(10) · deduction · not eligible · contractor · developer · sale of plots · construction of building · income tax

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Sky Builders and Developers v. ITO 1(1), Bhopal

The ITO, Ward-2 (1) (4), Rajkot-Gujarat vs. M/S Jagjit Builders and Developers, Rajkot-Gujarat

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 137/RJT/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Feb 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.137/Rjt/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2012-13) I.T.O, बनाम/ M/S Jagjit Builders & Ward-2(1), Developers, Vs. Rajkot. Ankur Apts., Dr. Floor, Aadarsh Society, B/H Ioc Bhavan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aadfj9480A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri M.N. Maurya, Cit. D.R ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri M.J. Ranpura, A.R सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 27/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement 28/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Captioned Appeal Has Been Filed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 2, Rajkot [Ld. Cit(A) In Short] Dated 25/02/2016, Arising In The Matter Of Assessment Order Passed Under S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As "The Act") Dated 27/02/2015 Relevant To Assessment Years (A.Y.) 2012-13. A.Y. 2012-13 The 1St Issue Raised By The Revenue Is That The Learned Cit (A) Erred In 2. Deleting The Addition Made By The Ao For Rs. 10,20,62,695/- On Account Of Unexplained Expenditure Under Section 69C Of The Act

For Appellant: Shri M.N. Maurya, CIT. D.RFor Respondent: Shri M.J. Ranpura, A.R
Section 133ASection 69C

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, राजकोट "यायपीठ, राजकोट । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER And Ms MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.137/Rjt/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2012-13) I.T.O, बनाम/ M/s Jagjit Builders And Ward-2(1), Developers, Vs. Rajkot. Ankur Apts., Dr. Floor, Aadarsh Society, B/h IOC Bhavan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AADFJ9480A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant by : Shri M.N. Maurya, CIT. D.R ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by : Shri M.J…