Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. v. ACIT, Central Circle-6(1) Chennai

46 SOT 112Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2014#5063 most cited

What is Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. v. ACIT, Central Circle-6(1) Chennai authority for?

When an assessee provides loans to its associated enterprise (AE) using its own funds (not borrowed funds), the arm's length interest rate for such inter-company loans should be determined by considering comparable interest rates like PLR, SBI short-term rate, or LIBOR plus a markup. This principle applies even if the funds were raised through sources like zero per cent optional convertible preferential shares.

23

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. v. ACIT · 46 SOT 112 · transfer pricing · associated enterprises · interest on inter-company loans · arm's length interest rate · own funds · borrowed funds · PLR rate · LIBOR rate

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. v. ACIT, Central Circle-6(1) Chennai

DCIT, Circle-4(1), Kolkata vs. M/S. M.K. Shah Exports Ltd., Kolkata

In the result the appeal by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2149/KOL/2014[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 May 2017AY 2008-2009

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am] I.T.A No. 2149/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2008-09 D.C.I.T., Circle-4(1), -Vs.- M/S. M.K.Shah Exports Ltd. Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Aaccm 0884 H] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : None (Dr)(Adj. Request Is Rejected) For The Respondent : Shri Rohit Shukla, Fca Date Of Hearing : 03.05.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 12.05.2017. Order Per N.V.Vasudevan, Jm This Is An Appeal By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 15.09.2014 Of C.I.T.(A)-Vi, Kolkata Relating To A.Y.2008-09. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Revenue Read As Follows :- 1. That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Holding That Addition On Account Of Adjustment Of Interest Of Rs.40,32,011 Charged To The Subsidiary Company Zao Classic Russia Was Not Warranted, Ignoring The Fact That The Addition Was Made On The Arms Length Price Determined By The Tpo U/S 92(Ca)(1). 2 That On The Facts & In Circumstances Of The Case, The Cit(A) Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Holding That Cess On Green Leaf Of Rs.1 ,44,03,221/- Is An Allowable Expenditure, Ignoring The Fact That It Is Directly Attributable To Core Agriculture Activities Which Is Taxable Under State Agriculture Income Tax, Beyond The Purview Of Central Income Tax & On The Same Issue Slp Is Pending In The Case Of Aft Industries. 3 That The Appellant Craves For Leave To Add, Delete Or Modify Any Of The Grounds Of Appeal Before Or At The Time Of Hearing.

For Appellant: None (DR)(Adj. request is rejected)For Respondent: Shri Rohit Shukla, FCA
Section 92

…Thus the rate of 8% charged by the appellant was higher than the LIBOR rate. The appellant also relied upon a number of decisions, in particular the decision of ITAT, Chennai in the case of Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd vs ACIT, Central Circle-6(1) Chennai 46 SOT 112. In the appellate proceedings the appellant has cited some more decisions such as Four Soft Ltd vs DC IT in ITA No. 1495/Hyd 12010, Cotton Natural (I) Pvt Ltd. vs DCIT in ITA No. 5855/De1/2012. In the case of Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. (supra), it has been held by the Hon'ble tribunal that once the transaction is between the assessee and th…