Jammanahally Prathamika Krishi Pattina Sahakara Sangha, Ballupet vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Hassan
In the result ITA No. 192/Bangalore/2025 filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 341/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi
For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel
Section 143(3)Section 80
…a vexed question that what is sufficient Page 5 of 16 cause for which delay can be condoned in filing of the appeal. The honourable Supreme Court in Shivamma (Dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Karnataka Housing Board and Ors. Equivalent/Neutral Citation: 2025 (4) C C C 75, 2025 INSC 1104 has laid down certain principles for condonation of delay that 212. The law as it presently stands, post the decision of Postmaster General (supra), is unambiguous and clear. Condonation of delay is to remain an exception, not the rule. Governmental litigants, no less than private parties, must demonstrate bona fide, sufficient, and cogent cau…