Shantai Exim Ltd. v. CIT

88 Taxmann.com 361Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2017#2463 most cited

What is Shantai Exim Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Revisional jurisdiction under section 263 is improperly invoked if initiated solely on the proposal of the Assessing Officer. Such invocation is bad in law.

47

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Shantai Exim Ltd. v. CIT · Section 263 · revisional jurisdiction · Assessing Officer proposal · bad in law · quash jurisdiction · ITAT Ahmedabad · Ashok Kumar Shivpuri v. CIT

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Shantai Exim Ltd. v. CIT

Morpheus Developers Private Limited, Delhi vs. Pr, CIT Delhi-4, Delhi

Appeal is allowed

ITA 1753/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year: 2016-17 Morpheus Developers Private Vs Pr. Cit, Ltd., Delhi-4, 1, Main Road, Delhi. Maujpur, Delhi – 110 053. Pan: Aaicm1972A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Yudhister Mehtani, Ca Revenue By : Ms Amisha S. Gupt, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 05.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 20.08.2025 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: This Appeal Is Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 18.03.2021 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Pciit) U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred As ‘The Act’) In Revision No.Pcit, Delhi-4/Revision-263/100000183556/2021 Arising Out Of The Order Dated 29.12.2018 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act By The Ito, Ward-17(1), Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao). 2. At The Outset, The Ld. Ar Has Pointed Out That There Was A Delay In Filing The Appeal. On Hearing On The Application For Condonation Of Delay, We Find That Primarily For The Reason That There Were Some Issues Pending Before The National Company Law Tribunal Followed By Appeal, There Could Not Be Adequate Representation Of The Assessee. In Fact, In January, 2023, The Greater Noida Authority Had Cancelled The Plot On Which The Company Was Running The Project. Thus, We Are Of The Considered View That The Delay Although Of Substantial Period Of Around 746 Days, Deserves To Be Condoned.

For Appellant: Shri Yudhister Mehtani, CAFor Respondent: Ms Amisha S. Gupt, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 Morpheus Developers Private Vs Pr. CIT, Ltd., Delhi-4, 1, Main Road, Delhi. Maujpur, Delhi – 110 053. PAN: AAICM1972A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Yudhister Mehtani, CA Revenue by : Ms Amisha S. Gupt, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 05.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 20.08.2025 ORDER PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 18.03.2021 of the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (…

Softel Plaza, Dehradun vs. Prcit, Dehradun

In the result, appeal is allowed

ITA 2281/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year:2014-15 Softel Plaza, C/O Matta Garg & Versus Pr. C.I.T., Co., 15, Astley Hall, Dehradun. Dehradun Pan: Abmfs1993B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. S.K. Matta, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, Cit/Dr Date Of Hearing : 19.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 23.06.2023 Order This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against Order Dated 09.03.2018 Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 By Learned Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Pcit) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Briefly, The Facts Are, The Assessee, A Partnership Firm, Is Engaged In The Business Of Running A Hotel Located In The Outskirts Of Dehradun. For The Assessment Year Under Dispute, The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income On 27.09.2014 Declaring Nil Income After Claiming

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Matta, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, CIT/DR
Section 143(2)Section 263Section 80I

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DEHRADUN CIRCUIT BENCH, DEHRADUN BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year:2014-15 Softel Plaza, C/o Matta Garg & Versus Pr. C.I.T., Co., 15, Astley Hall, Dehradun. Dehradun PAN: ABMFS1993B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. S.K. Matta, CA Revenue by : Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, CIT/DR Date of hearing : 19.06.2023 Date of pronouncement: 23.06.2023 ORDER This is an appeal by the Assessee against order dated 09.03.2018 passed under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by learned Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) f…