SAP Labs India (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT

8 Taxmann.com 207Reported decision2010#11804 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

working capital adjustment transactional net margin method tested party comparable companies arm's length price associated enterprises associated enterprise transfer pricing adjustment international transaction final assessment order section 234b section 234

Judgments citing SAP Labs India (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT

Cvent India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in both the A

ITA 187/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: ShriDheeraj Kumar Jaiswal, Sr. DR

Section 92CSection 92D

…ITA No. 2374/DEL/2012 [A.Y. 2010-11] 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘I’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT, AND SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cvent India Pvt Ltd Vs. TheI.T.O 19th Floor, Tower C & D Ward - 3(4) Building 14, DLF Cyber City New Delhi Gurgaon PAN – AACCC 7667 F Cvent India Pvt Ltd TheA.CI.T. 19thFloor, Tower C & D Circle -6(2) Building 14, DLF Cyber City New Delhi Gurgaon PAN – AACCC 7667 F TheDy.CI.T. Cvent India Pvt Ltd Circle -7(1) 19th Floor, Tower C & D New Delhi Building 14, DLF Cyber City Gurgaon PAN – AAACD 6817 F (App…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Officer Circle-3(1)(1), Bangalore vs. M/S Fmc India Private Limited, Bangalore

In the result, appeal filed by assessee stands partly allowed and appeal filed by revenue stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2732/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Fmc India Pvt. The Assistant Ltd., Commissioner Of Embassy Star 1St Floor, Income Tax, No. 8 Palace Road, Circle 3(1)(1), Bangalore – 560 052. Bangalore. Vs. Pan: Aaacf4579N Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year : 2013-14 (By Revenue) Assessee By : Shri Nageswar Rao, Advocate Revenue By : Smt. S. Praveena, Cit Drp-2 Date Of Hearing : 07-07-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-09-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Cross Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against Order Dated 23/07/2018 Passes By The Ld.Cit(A)-3, Bangalore For Assessment Year 2013-14 On Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. S. Praveena, CIT DRP-2

Section 250Section 37(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/s. FMC India Pvt. The Assistant Ltd., Commissioner of Embassy Star 1st Floor, Income Tax, No. 8 Palace Road, Circle 3(1)(1), Bangalore – 560 052. Bangalore. Vs. PAN: AAACF4579N APPELLANT RESPONDENT & Assessment Year : 2013-14 (By Revenue) Assessee by : Shri Nageswar Rao, Advocate Revenue by : Smt. S. Praveena, CIT DRP-2 Date of Hearing : 07-07-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 29-09-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present cross appeal…

M/S Fmc India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-3(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, appeal filed by assessee stands partly allowed and appeal filed by revenue stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2611/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. S. Praveena, CIT DRP-2

Section 250Section 37(1)

M/S Tyco Fire & Security India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-7(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands partly allowed as indicated hereinabove

ITA 3363/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 3363/Bang/2018 Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. Tyco Fire & The Assistant Security India Pvt. Ltd., Commissioner Of D-601, Rmz Contennial, Income Tax, Kundalahalli Main Road, Circle – 7 (1)(1), Bangalore – 560 048. Vs. Bangalore. Pan: Aabct0087C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Rajan Vora, Ca : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, Cit Revenue By Dr (Osd) Date Of Hearing : 05-01-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30-03-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Final Assessment Order Dated 26.10.2018 Passed By The Ld.Acit, Circle – 7(1)(1), Bangalore For Assessment Year 2014-15 On Following Grounds Of Appeal. “Based On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, Tyco Fire & Security India Private Limited (Hereinafter Referred To As "The Appellant"), Respectfully Craves Leave To Prefer An Appeal Against The Appeal Order Passed By The Learned Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The "Learned Ao") Dated October 26, 2018 Under Section 143(3) Read With Section 144C Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 ("The Act") Pursuant To The Directions Dated September 20, 2018 Issued By The Dispute Resolution Panel (Hereinafter Referred To As The "Drp") U/S 144C (5) Of The Act (`The Impugned Order') Inter-Alia On The Following Grounds: That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law:

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Vora, CA

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 3363/Bang/2018 Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/s. Tyco Fire & The Assistant Security India Pvt. Ltd., Commissioner of D-601, RMZ Contennial, Income Tax, Kundalahalli Main Road, Circle – 7 (1)(1), Bangalore – 560 048. Vs. Bangalore. PAN: AABCT0087C APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Rajan Vora, CA : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT Revenue by DR (OSD) Date of Hearing : 05-01-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 30-03-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present a…

Synechron Technologies Pvt.Ltd, Pune vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 6, Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1692/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1692/Pun/2018 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Synechron Technologies Private Limited Cedar Building, Ascendas International, Tech Park Pune, Plot No.18, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjewadi, Phase-Iii, Pune-411 057. Pan : Aaics2894R .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-6, Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri M.P. LohiaFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena

Section 144C(5)Section 92C(2)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “सी” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, PUNE (Through Virtual Court) BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, VP AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA No. 1692/PUN/2018 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Synechron Technologies Private Limited CEDAR Building, Ascendas International, Tech Park Pune, Plot No.18, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjewadi, Phase-III, Pune-411 057. PAN : AAICS2894R .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/s. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6, Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Assessee by : Shri M.P. Lohia Revenue by : Shr…

Global E-Business Operations Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-3(1)(2), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed

ITA 725/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri B.R. Baskaranit(Tp)A No.725/Bang/2017 Assessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Sarath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, D.R

Section 143(3)

…IT(TP)A No.725/Bang/2017 Global e-Business Operations Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.725/Bang/2017 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Global E-Business Operations Pvt. Ltd. 2nd Floor Kalyani Platina, Phase-II ACIT Building Survey Number 16 & 24 Circle-3(1)(2) of Kundanahalli Village Vs. Bangalore K.R. Puram, Hobli Bangalore-560 066 PAN NO : AABCG2843D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri Sarath Rao, A.R. Respondent by : Shri Sanjay Kumar, D.R. Date of Hearing…

M/S Avnet India Pvt Ltd, Bangalore vs. The Income Tax Officer Circle-1(1)(4), Bangalore

In the result appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 744/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Dec 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.K.Garodia & Smt.Beena Pillai, Judical Member It(Tp)A No.744(Bang)/2017 (Assessment Year : 2012-13) M/S Avnet India Pvt.Ltd., No.402, 4Th Floor, Rmz Infinity Tower-B, No.3, Old Madras Road, Bangalore-560 016. Appellant Vs The Income Tax Officer, Circle-1(1)(4), Bmtc Building, Koramangala, 6Th Block, Bangalore Respondent Appellant By : Shri Padamchand Khincha, Ca Revenue By : Ms.Neera Malhotra, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Ms.Neera Malhotra, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES : “B”, BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI A.K.GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT.BEENA PILLAI, JUDICAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No.744(Bang)/2017 (Assessment year : 2012-13) M/s Avnet India Pvt.Ltd., No.402, 4th Floor, RMZ Infinity Tower-B, No.3, Old Madras Road, Bangalore-560 016. Appellant Vs The Income Tax Officer, Circle-1(1)(4), BMTC Building, Koramangala, 6th Block, Bangalore Respondent Appellant by : Shri Padamchand Khincha, CA Revenue by : Ms.Neera Malhotra, CIT DR Date of hearing : 11-12-2019 Date of pronouncement : 13-12-2-019 O R D E R PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL ME…

Arctern Consulting Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 352/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranit(Tp)A No.352/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Arctern Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Embassy Tech Village, Income-Tax, Tower 2B Hibiscus, 5Th Floor, Circle – 1(1)(2), Deverabeesanahalli, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 037. Pan : Aaeca 9113 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Pradeep Kumar, Cit-Dr(Itat)(Bengaluru) Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.10.2019 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR(ITAT)(Bengaluru)

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 92

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.352/Bang/2017 Assessment year : 2012-13 M/s. Arctern Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Embassy Tech Village, Income-tax, Tower 2B Hibiscus, 5th Floor, Circle – 1(1)(2), Deverabeesanahalli, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 037. PAN : AAECA 9113 F APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR(ITAT)(Bengaluru) Date of hearing : 09.10.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 15.10.2019 O R D E R Per N.…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 5(1)(1), Bangalore vs. M/S. Neobytes Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru

In the result appeal filed by revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1108/BANG/2017[2009 - 10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Sept 2019

Bench: Shri B.R.Baskaran & Smt.Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri S.V.Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr.P.V.Pradeep Kumar, Addl.CIT

Section 10ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 8

…that Ld.CIT (A) by following decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in case of CIT vs Tata Elxsi Ltd reported in 349 ITR 98 directed Ld.AO to compute deduction under section 10A, as per ratio laid down by SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT reported in (2010) 8 Taxmann.com 207 and Triology E-business software India Pvt Ltd. vs DCIT Hon’ble Court. It has been agitated by the Ld.CIT, DR that telecommunication expenses and expenses incurred in foreign currency cannot be reduced from total turnover for computing section 10 A of the Act, as there is no such provision. It has been submitted that section 10 A (iv) is ve…