Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. v. DDIT

31 Taxmann.com 256Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2013#6064 most cited
19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. v. DDIT · 2013 · ITAT · section 9(1)(vi) · section 9(1)(vii) · section 195 · fees for technical services · enduring benefit · computer software · TRC · tax residency certificate

Sections most often in play

Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)Section 195Section 13(4)Section 13(3)(a)Section 13(4)(c)

Issues it is cited on

section 9(1)(v)tax residency certificatefees for included servicestrcsection 9(1)(vi)section 9(1)(vii)computer softwareenduring benefitfees for technical servicessection 195childsection 9(1)

Judgments citing Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. v. DDIT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (I.T) -3(2)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. M/S. MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result all appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 5728/MUM/2024[2021 22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2025

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Ms. Padmavathy S ()

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.3047/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 I.T.A. No.3048/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Mott Income Tax (IT)-3(2)(2) Macdonald Limited Room No. 1632, 16th 8-10, Mott Macdonal Floor, Air India Building, House, Sydenham Nariman Point, Road Croydon, Mumbai - 400021 Foreign, United Kingdom PAN:AAGCM0989F (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.5727/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 I.T.A. No.5725/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 I.T.A.…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (I.T) -3(2)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. M/S. MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result all appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 5727/MUM/2024[2018 19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2025

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Ms. Padmavathy S ()

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.3047/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 I.T.A. No.3048/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Mott Income Tax (IT)-3(2)(2) Macdonald Limited Room No. 1632, 16th 8-10, Mott Macdonal Floor, Air India Building, House, Sydenham Nariman Point, Road Croydon, Mumbai - 400021 Foreign, United Kingdom PAN:AAGCM0989F (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.5727/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 I.T.A. No.5725/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 I.T.A.…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (I.T) -3(2)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. M/S. MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result all appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 5726/MUM/2024[2020 21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2025

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Ms. Padmavathy S ()

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.3047/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 I.T.A. No.3048/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Mott Income Tax (IT)-3(2)(2) Macdonald Limited Room No. 1632, 16th 8-10, Mott Macdonal Floor, Air India Building, House, Sydenham Nariman Point, Road Croydon, Mumbai - 400021 Foreign, United Kingdom PAN:AAGCM0989F (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.5727/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 I.T.A. No.5725/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 I.T.A.…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (I.T) -3(2)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. M/S. MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result all appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 5725/MUM/2024[2019 20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2025

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Ms. Padmavathy S ()

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.3047/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 I.T.A. No.3048/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Mott Income Tax (IT)-3(2)(2) Macdonald Limited Room No. 1632, 16th 8-10, Mott Macdonal Floor, Air India Building, House, Sydenham Nariman Point, Road Croydon, Mumbai - 400021 Foreign, United Kingdom PAN:AAGCM0989F (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.5727/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 I.T.A. No.5725/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 I.T.A.…

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-3(2)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED , MUMBAI

In the result all appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 3048/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Ms. Padmavathy S ()

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.3047/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 I.T.A. No.3048/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Mott Income Tax (IT)-3(2)(2) Macdonald Limited Room No. 1632, 16th 8-10, Mott Macdonal Floor, Air India Building, House, Sydenham Nariman Point, Road Croydon, Mumbai - 400021 Foreign, United Kingdom PAN:AAGCM0989F (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.5727/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 I.T.A. No.5725/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 I.T.A.…

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 3(2)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED., MUMBAI

In the result all appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 3047/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Ms. Padmavathy S ()

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.3047/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 I.T.A. No.3048/Mum/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Mott Income Tax (IT)-3(2)(2) Macdonald Limited Room No. 1632, 16th 8-10, Mott Macdonal Floor, Air India Building, House, Sydenham Nariman Point, Road Croydon, Mumbai - 400021 Foreign, United Kingdom PAN:AAGCM0989F (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.5727/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 I.T.A. No.5725/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 I.T.A.…

ACIT (IT) -4(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 6334/MUM/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Nov 2019AY 2018-19
Section 195Section 195ASection 248Section 9Section 9(1)(vi)

…ITA Nos. 6331 to 6334/Mum/2018 ACIT Vs. Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd Assessment year: 2018-19 Page 1 of 21 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “I” BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)] ITA Nos. 6331 to 6334/Mum/2018 Assessment year: 2018-19 Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax ………………………Appellant (IT)– 4(1)(1), Mumbai Vs Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd ………………..……Respondent 3rd Floor, Maker Chambers, IV, 222, Nariman Point, Mumbai Maharashtra-400021 [PAN: AABCI6363G] Appearances by Avaneesh Tiwari for the appellant Sunil M Lala for the respondent Date of concluding…

ACIT (IT) -4(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 6333/MUM/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Nov 2019AY 2018-19
Section 195Section 195ASection 248Section 9Section 9(1)(vi)

…ITA Nos. 6331 to 6334/Mum/2018 ACIT Vs. Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd Assessment year: 2018-19 Page 1 of 21 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “I” BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)] ITA Nos. 6331 to 6334/Mum/2018 Assessment year: 2018-19 Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax ………………………Appellant (IT)– 4(1)(1), Mumbai Vs Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd ………………..……Respondent 3rd Floor, Maker Chambers, IV, 222, Nariman Point, Mumbai Maharashtra-400021 [PAN: AABCI6363G] Appearances by Avaneesh Tiwari for the appellant Sunil M Lala for the respondent Date of concluding…

ACIT (IT) -4(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 6332/MUM/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Nov 2019AY 2018-19
Section 195Section 195ASection 248Section 9Section 9(1)(vi)

…ITA Nos. 6331 to 6334/Mum/2018 ACIT Vs. Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd Assessment year: 2018-19 Page 1 of 21 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “I” BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)] ITA Nos. 6331 to 6334/Mum/2018 Assessment year: 2018-19 Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax ………………………Appellant (IT)– 4(1)(1), Mumbai Vs Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd ………………..……Respondent 3rd Floor, Maker Chambers, IV, 222, Nariman Point, Mumbai Maharashtra-400021 [PAN: AABCI6363G] Appearances by Avaneesh Tiwari for the appellant Sunil M Lala for the respondent Date of concluding…

H.J. HEINZ COMPANY, USA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1991/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleh. J. Heinz Company, Usa Vs Adit 7Th Floor, D-Shivsagar Estate, Circle-1(2) Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli International Taxation Mumabi New Delhi Aacch2144P (Respondent) (Appellant) H. J. Heinz Company, Usa Vs Acit 7Th Floor, D-Shivsagar Estate, Circle-2(1)(1), Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli International Taxation, Mumabi Room No. 410, 4Th Floor, E- Aacch2144P Z Block, Pratyaksh Kar (Appellant) Bhawan New Delhi (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 234BSection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)

…DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER H. J. Heinz Company, USA Vs ADIT 7th Floor, D-Shivsagar Estate, Circle-1(2) Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli International Taxation Mumabi New Delhi AACCH2144P (RESPONDENT) (APPELLANT) H. J. Heinz Company, USA Vs ACIT 7th Floor, D-Shivsagar Estate, Circle-2(1)(1), Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli International Taxation, Mumabi Room NO. 410, 4th Floor, E- AACCH2144P Z Block, Pratyaksh Kar (APPELLANT) Bhawan New Delhi (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv, Ms. Soumya Singh, Adv, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv…

H.J. HEINZ COMPANY, USA,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6252/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleh. J. Heinz Company, Usa Vs Adit 7Th Floor, D-Shivsagar Estate, Circle-1(2) Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli International Taxation Mumabi New Delhi Aacch2144P (Respondent) (Appellant) H. J. Heinz Company, Usa Vs Acit 7Th Floor, D-Shivsagar Estate, Circle-2(1)(1), Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli International Taxation, Mumabi Room No. 410, 4Th Floor, E- Aacch2144P Z Block, Pratyaksh Kar (Appellant) Bhawan New Delhi (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 234BSection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)

…DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER H. J. Heinz Company, USA Vs ADIT 7th Floor, D-Shivsagar Estate, Circle-1(2) Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli International Taxation Mumabi New Delhi AACCH2144P (RESPONDENT) (APPELLANT) H. J. Heinz Company, USA Vs ACIT 7th Floor, D-Shivsagar Estate, Circle-2(1)(1), Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli International Taxation, Mumabi Room NO. 410, 4th Floor, E- AACCH2144P Z Block, Pratyaksh Kar (APPELLANT) Bhawan New Delhi (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv, Ms. Soumya Singh, Adv, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv…

THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US) LLC,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (IT) 4(2), MUMBAI

In the result the Ground No

ITA 4362/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice- & Shri Pawan Singhthe Nielsen Company (Us) Dcit (It) - 4(2) Llc, C/O Nielsen (India) Pvt. Mumbai. Ltd., 6Th Floor, Block-C, Godrej Vs. It Park, 02 Godrej Business, District, Phirojshah Nagar, Lbs Marg, Vikhroli (W), Mumbai-400079. Pan: Aacfj7526Q Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri P.J. Pardiwala With Sh. Madhur Agrawal (Ars) Respondent By : Shri Himanshu Sharma & Sh. Nishant Samaiya (Sr. Drs)

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala with ShFor Respondent: Shri Himanshu Sharma and Sh. Nishant Samaiya (Sr. DRs)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 234BSection 253Section 254(1)

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI PAWAN SINGH JUDICIAL MEMBER The Nielsen Company (US) DCIT (IT) - 4(2) LLC, C/o Nielsen (India) Pvt. Mumbai. Ltd., 6th Floor, Block-C, Godrej Vs. IT Park, 02 Godrej Business, District, Phirojshah Nagar, LBS Marg, Vikhroli (W), Mumbai-400079. PAN: AACFJ7526Q Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri P.J. Pardiwala with Sh. Madhur Agrawal (ARs) Respondent by : Shri Himanshu Sharma and Sh. Nishant Samaiya (Sr. DRs) Date of Hearing : 17.05.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 22.05.2019 ORDERUNDER SECTION 254(1)OF INCO…

JOHN DEERE EQIPMENT P. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 908/PUN/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.905 & 906/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: S/Shri Ajay Modi, Pankaj Garg and Sudhendu Das
Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 9(1)(vi)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण पुणे न्यायपीठ “बी” पुणे में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE सुश्री सुषमा चावऱा, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री अयिऱ चतुवेदी, ऱेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA Nos.905 & 906/PUN/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09 John Deere India Pvt. Ltd., Tower XIV, Cybercity, Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411028 …. PAN: AAACJ4233B Vs. The Dy. Director of Income Tax …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent (International Taxation)–1, Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA Nos.907 & 908/PUN/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assess…

JOHN DEERE EQIPMENT P. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 907/PUN/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.905 & 906/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: S/Shri Ajay Modi, Pankaj Garg and Sudhendu Das
Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 9(1)(vi)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण पुणे न्यायपीठ “बी” पुणे में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE सुश्री सुषमा चावऱा, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री अयिऱ चतुवेदी, ऱेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA Nos.905 & 906/PUN/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09 John Deere India Pvt. Ltd., Tower XIV, Cybercity, Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411028 …. PAN: AAACJ4233B Vs. The Dy. Director of Income Tax …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent (International Taxation)–1, Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA Nos.907 & 908/PUN/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assess…

JOHN DEERE INDIA PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 906/PUN/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.905 & 906/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: S/Shri Ajay Modi, Pankaj Garg and Sudhendu Das
Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 9(1)(vi)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण पुणे न्यायपीठ “बी” पुणे में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE सुश्री सुषमा चावऱा, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री अयिऱ चतुवेदी, ऱेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA Nos.905 & 906/PUN/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09 John Deere India Pvt. Ltd., Tower XIV, Cybercity, Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411028 …. PAN: AAACJ4233B Vs. The Dy. Director of Income Tax …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent (International Taxation)–1, Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA Nos.907 & 908/PUN/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assess…

JOHN DEERE INDIA PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 905/PUN/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jan 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.905 & 906/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: S/Shri Ajay Modi, Pankaj Garg and Sudhendu Das
Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 9(1)(vi)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण पुणे न्यायपीठ “बी” पुणे में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE सुश्री सुषमा चावऱा, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री अयिऱ चतुवेदी, ऱेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA Nos.905 & 906/PUN/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2007-08 & 2008-09 John Deere India Pvt. Ltd., Tower XIV, Cybercity, Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411028 …. PAN: AAACJ4233B Vs. The Dy. Director of Income Tax …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent (International Taxation)–1, Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA Nos.907 & 908/PUN/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assess…

CIENA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6(1), NEW DELHI

In the result grounds raised by assessee for the year under consideration stands allowed

ITA 3563/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri R.K.Panda & Smt. Beena A Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. D.R
Section 234DSection 244ASection 250(6)Section 253(1)(a)Section 40

…t. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle-6(1), N.D. • Decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Skycell Communications Ltd vs. DCIT reported in (2001) 251 ITR 53; • Decision of Pune ITAT bench in the case of Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd., vs. DDIT reported in (2013) 31 Taxmann.com 256; • Decision of Hyderabad ITAT in the case of ADIT vs. BHEL-GE- Gas Turbine Servicing Pvt. Ltd. reported in (2012) 24 taxman.com 25. 5.4. Ld.Counsel submitted that TDS could be deducted on any payment made to a non-resident only if its income is chargeable to tax in India. He submitted that the payment received by non-resident do not satisf…

CIENA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6(1), NEW DELHI

In the result grounds raised by assessee for the year under consideration stands allowed

ITA 3562/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Sept 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri R.K.Panda & Smt. Beena A Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. D.R
Section 234DSection 244ASection 250(6)Section 253(1)(a)Section 40

…t. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle-6(1), N.D. • Decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Skycell Communications Ltd vs. DCIT reported in (2001) 251 ITR 53; • Decision of Pune ITAT bench in the case of Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd., vs. DDIT reported in (2013) 31 Taxmann.com 256; • Decision of Hyderabad ITAT in the case of ADIT vs. BHEL-GE- Gas Turbine Servicing Pvt. Ltd. reported in (2012) 24 taxman.com 25. 5.4. Ld.Counsel submitted that TDS could be deducted on any payment made to a non-resident only if its income is chargeable to tax in India. He submitted that the payment received by non-resident do not satisf…

CIENA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6(1), NEW DELHI

In the result grounds raised by assessee for the year under consideration stands allowed

ITA 3561/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri R.K.Panda & Smt. Beena A Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. D.R
Section 234DSection 244ASection 250(6)Section 253(1)(a)Section 40

…t. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle-6(1), N.D. • Decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Skycell Communications Ltd vs. DCIT reported in (2001) 251 ITR 53; • Decision of Pune ITAT bench in the case of Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd., vs. DDIT reported in (2013) 31 Taxmann.com 256; • Decision of Hyderabad ITAT in the case of ADIT vs. BHEL-GE- Gas Turbine Servicing Pvt. Ltd. reported in (2012) 24 taxman.com 25. 5.4. Ld.Counsel submitted that TDS could be deducted on any payment made to a non-resident only if its income is chargeable to tax in India. He submitted that the payment received by non-resident do not satisf…

Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. v. DDIT (31 Taxmann.com 256) — Cited in 19 Judgments | BharatTax