Rusabh Diamonds v. ACIT

158 ITD 564Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2016#16837 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,356 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Sections most often in play

Section 115BBE Section 68

Issues it is cited on

section 2(9)section 69d section 64 section 113 clarificatory amendment section 92b section 17 section 69b section 92 international transaction concealment of income section 115bb

Judgments citing Rusabh Diamonds v. ACIT

Anatole Solutions Private Limited, Jaipur vs. ACIT Circle 2, Jaipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1082/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar, JCIT-DR

Section 115BSection 234ASection 56(2)(viib)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, जयपुर न्यायपीठ, जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, “A” JAIPUR श्री संदीप गोसाई, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री गगन गोयल लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1082/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/s. Anatole Solutions Pvt Ltd. A-704, Mansarovar Lane Patrakar Colony, Jaipur- 303 020 बनाम Vs. The ACIT Circle-2 Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AAKCA 1958 Q अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निधर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से / R…

Mahesh Kumar Gupta, Jaipur vs. ACIT, Circle-4, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 149/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Sogani (C.A.) &For Respondent: Smt Runi Pal (Addl. CIT) a

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 149/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2017-18 cuke Mahesh Kumar Gupta ACIT 121 Govind Nagar East, Street No Vs. Circle-04, Jaipur 8 Amer Road, Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AGHPG 0206 H vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. Rajeev Sogani (C.A.) & Sh. Rohan Sogani (…

Sandeep Sethi, Jaipur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Jaipur

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 155/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Dhariwal (CIT)

Section 115BSection 132(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, “B” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM deys’k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 155/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2017-18 cuke Shri Sandeep Sethi Deputy Commissioner of Income Vs. 417, Sethi Bhawan, Tax, Hanuman Ji Ka Rasta, Central Circle-1, Jaipur. Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AGWPS 6940 H vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 154/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@A…

Rajiv Nigotiya, Jaipur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Jaipur

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 154/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Dhariwal (CIT)

Section 115BSection 132(1)

Csav Group (India) Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Gurgaon

In the result, appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1941/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Rajan R. VoraFor Respondent: Ms. Samruddhi D. Hande

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 234BSection 271(1)(c)Section 92CSection 92D

…allenge in present appeal, will also be at arm‟s length on TNMM basis. Hapag–Lloyd Global Services Pvt. Ltd. [Successor of CSAV Group (India) Pvt. Ltd.] ITA no.1941/Del./2015 38. We find that coordinate bench of the Tribunal in Rusabh Diamonds vs ACIT, (2016) 158 ITD 564 (Mumbai) observed as under: “12. In our considered view, even if we proceed on the basis that Explanation to Section 92B is Indeed retrospective in effect and it does cover delay in realization of debts, as long as sale is benchmarked on TNMM basis, as in this situation before us, there cannot be any occasion to make a separate adjustment for de…