India Debt Management P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cir 3(2)(1), Mumbai
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 7518/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2016AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri J P Boaz & Shri Amit Shuklait(Tp) A No. : 7518/Mum/2014 (Assessment Year: 2004-05) इं"डया डै"ट मैनेजम"ट "ाइवेट "ल"मटेड Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-3(2)(1), India Debt Management Pvt Ltd, Aayakar Bhavan, M K Road, 45, 4The Floor, Maker Cambers Vi, Mumbai -400 020 Nariman Point, Mumbai -400 021 "थयी लेखा सं.:Pan: Aaact 1982 D अपीलाथ" (Appellant) ""यथ" (Respondent) Appellant By "ी जे डी "म""ी : Shri J D Mistry Respondent By : "ी एन के चाँद Shri N K Chand सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 14-12-2015 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 10-03-2016 आदेश Order अिमत शु"ला : "या. स.: Per Amit Shukla, Jm: The Aforesaid Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against Impugned Final Assessment Order Dated 27Th November, 2014 Passed Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) By Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle -3(2)(1), Mumbai In Pursuance Of Direction Given By Dispute Resolution Panel –I, Mumbai (Drp) Under Section 144C(5), Vide Order Dated 16.10.2014. In The Various Grounds Of Appeal, The Assessee Has Mainly Challenged Following Issues:
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 234ASection 234B
…ustments for such differences are not available then, information derived from uncontrolled comparables in the most similar market for which the reliable data is available may be used. Thereafter, referring to Delhi ITAT decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. (110 ITD 428) and other decisions on the concept of “tested party” and reiterating the reasoning of the TPO, Ld. DRP upheld the arm’s length rate of 5.68% and thereby the quantum of adjustment made by the TPO as per the discussion appearing from pages 25 to 29 of the impugned order. 8. Before us on behalf of the assessee, Ld. Senior Counsel, Shri J.D. Mistry…