Rajaram Stock Broking Co. (Mumbai), Mumbai vs. ITO WD 4(2)(1), Mumbai
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 2250/MUM/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2020AY 2004-05
Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Ram Lal Negirajaram Stock Broking Co. Vs. Ito,Ward-4(2)(1) (Mumbai) Private Limited Aaykar Bhawan 919, P.J.Tower M.K.Road Dalal Street, Fort Mumbai-400 007 Mumbai-400 023 Pan/Gir No.Aabcr1110Q Appellant) .. Respondent)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 27l(1)(c)Section 68
…the matter of penalty imposable in case of surrender of income to buy mental peace, the appellant has relied upon some case laws, e.g. CIT vs. Marsh Talwar 335 1TR 200 (Del.}, CIT vs. SLN Traders 243 CTR 407 (Kar), Ramruith Jagannath vs. State of Maharashtra 57 STC 46 (Bom) etc. I find the same to be distinguishable, since in present case, the income surrendered is nothing but the peak credit in respect of 2 \ concerns i.e. M/s Ruchita Enterprises & M/s Antima Corporation, which were already part of addition made in original assessment order. Hence, in effect, the appellant had asked for relief in respect of cas…