RAMILABEN B. PATEL v. INCOME TAX OFFICER IN THE ITAT\nAHMEDABAD BENCH

174 ITD 694Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2019#15096 most cited
6

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,254 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Sections most often in play

Section 115BBESection 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 132(4A)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153A

Issues it is cited on

section 127(2)(a)section 2(12a)section 106section 66section 127(2)section 114section 144aincome tax settlement commissionsection 57(iii)section 158bbpreponderance of probabilitystatement under section 132(4)

Judgments citing RAMILABEN B. PATEL v. INCOME TAX OFFICER IN THE ITAT\nAHMEDABAD BENCH

Kailash Chand Maheshwari, Jaipur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Jaipur

ITA 1465/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 May 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri S. L. Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Ojha, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 144Section 153ASection 57Section 68Section 69C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, जयपुर न्यायपीठ, जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR डा0 एस. सीथललक्ष्मी, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री राठौड कमलेश जयंतभाई, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1463 to 1465/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2015-16 to 2017-18 Kailash Chand Maheshwari 223 Kirti Nagar, Near Kamal and Company Tonk Road, Jaipur बनाम Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-02, Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं./जी.आई.आर.सं./PAN/GIR No.: AKQPM5593A अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रतियोधी/Respondent निर्णयार्थी की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri S. L.…

Kailash Chand Maheshwari, Jaipur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralcircle-2, Jaipur

ITA 1464/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 May 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri S. L. Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Ojha, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 144Section 153ASection 57Section 68Section 69C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, जयपुर न्यायपीठ, जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR डॉ. एस. सीतलक्ष्मी, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री राठौड़ कमलेश जयन्तभाई, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1463 to 1465/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2015-16 to 2017-18 Kailash Chand Maheshwari 223 Kirti Nagar, Near Kamal and Company Tonk Road, Jaipur बनाम Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-02, Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं./जी.आई.आर. सं./PAN/GIR No.: AKQPM5593A अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रEstosi / Respondent निर्णयार्थी की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri…

Kailash Chand Maheshwari, Jaipur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur

ITA 1463/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S. L. Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Ojha, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 144Section 153ASection 57Section 68Section 69C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos. 1463 to 1465/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2015-16 to 2017-18 cuke Kailash Chand Maheshwari DCIT, Vs. 223 Kirti Nagar, Near Kamal and Central Circle-02, Company Tonk Road, Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AKQPM5593A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri S. L.…

Ram Dev Chandelwal, S/O Shri Heera Lal Chandelwal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - Bundi

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 585/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Or At The Time Of Hearing.”

For Appellant: Shri S.L. Poddar (Adv.)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT) a
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 585/JPR/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2017-18 cuke Ram Dev Chandel Income Tax Officer, S/o Shri Neera Lal Chandel Vs. Ward, Bundi Village Karwar, Tehsil- Nainwan, Bundi. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AGHPC 6443 Q vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri S.L. Poddar (Adv.…

Shri Chandubhai Ramjibhai Kaqthiriya, Jasdan, Dist. Rajkot-364490 vs. The CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 168/RJT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot29 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Us Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Upholding Addition Of Rs. 14,32,782/- Being 50 Percent Of Agricultural Income Treating As Unexplained Cash Credit U/S. 68 Of The Income Tax Act In The Absence Of Books Of Accounts.

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

…r section 68 of the Act, since the bank account of the assessee is not considered as part and parcel of the books of accounts. Thus the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted. 7.2. In the case of Smt. Ramilaben B. Patel Vs. ITO reported in [2019] 174 ITD 694 it was held as follows: “-Income from undisclosed sources-Addition under section 68Credit in bank passbook---Bank statement is not considered as books of account, therefore, any sum found credited in bank passbook could not be treated as an unexplained cash credit under section 68.-Certain credit entries were reflecting as cash deposit in bank ac…

Mrs. Renu Sehgal, Jaipur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Jaipur

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is allowed and that of the

ITA 708/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 837/Jp/2018 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year : 2012-13 Cuke The Acit Smt. Renu Sehgal Vs. Central Circle-3 27, Onkar Nagar, Civil Lines Jaipur Jaipur Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aepps 3048 M Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 708 & 709 Jp/2018 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year : 2012-13 & 2015-16 Cuke Mrs. Renu Sehgal The Dcit Vs. 227-278, Nemisagar Colony Central Circle-3, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur Jaipur Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aepps 3048 M Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Varinder Mehta, Cit-Dr Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri P.C. Parwal, Ca Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 06/08/2019 ?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 19/08/2019 Vkns'K@ Order Per Vijay Pal Rao, Jm There Are Cross Appeals For The Assessment Year 2012-13 Directed Against The Order Dated 09-04-2013 Of The Ld. Cit(A)-4, Jaipur. The 2 Smt. Renu Sehgal Vs Dcit, Central Circle-3, Jaipur

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta, CIT-DR fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 51Section 68

…k through RTGS transfer. Therefore, it is not a credit in the books of account and consequently, the provisions of Section 68 cannot be invoked. In support of his contention, he has relied on the following decisions. 1. Smt. Ramilaben B Patel vs ITO (2019) 174 ITD 694 (Ahd. Tribunal) 2. Satish Kumar vs ITO (2019) 175 DTR 121 (Asr. Tribunal) 10 Smt. Renu Sehgal vs DCIT, Central Circle-3, Jaipur 3. Mehl V Vyas vs ITO (2017) 164 ITD 296 (Mumbai Tribunal) The ld.AR thus supported the order of the ld. CIT(A). 2.8 We have considered the rival submissions as well as relevant material on record. The AO has refer…

RAMILABEN B. PATEL v. INCOME TAX OFFICER IN THE ITAT\nAHMEDABAD BENCH (174 ITD 694) — Cited in 6 Judgments | BharatTax