Rajmoti Industries v. ITO (52 ITD 286)

M/S Parasnath Fuels (P) Ltd., Dehradun vs. DCIT, Dehradun

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwalparasnath Fuels Pvt. Ltd., The Dcit, Circle 1(1), 28 Feet Road, Dehradun Vikas Nagar, Vs Dehradun - 248198 Pan-Aaicp2190D Assessee Revenue Assessee By Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv., Shri Somil Agarwal, Adv. Revenue By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Jcit Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 11.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28.11.2025 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am, This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appellate Centre [Cit(A), In Short], Dated 08.10.2024 In Appeal No. Nfac/2016-17/10104734 Arising Out Of The Order Passed U/S 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Dt. 08.10.2024 For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. That Having Regard To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Assumption Of Jurisdiction In Initiating The Proceedings U/S 147 & Passing The Impugned Order U/S 147/144B & That Too Without Complying With Mandatory Conditions U/S 147 To 151A Parasnath Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Dcit

Section 115BSection 147Section 234ASection 68

…n view of the following judicial pronouncements: * Chakresh Kumar Jain vs DCIT, in ITA 37/Agra/2011, Date of order 02-03-2012. (ITAT, Agra) * Electro (Jaipur) (P) Ltd. vs Inspecting Assisting Commissioner, 26 ITD 236. (ITAT, Delhi) * Rajmoti Industries vs ITO 52 ITD 286 (ITAT, Ahmadabad) * Mahavir Prasad Gupta vs JCIT 101 TTJ 1078. (ITAT, Delhi) * CIT vs Mukta Metal Works, 336 ITR 555 (P&H) It is further submitted that Your Honours have ample powers in this regard under the law as explained by Jurisdictional Delhi Court in the case of CIT vs. Text Hundred India Pvt. Ltd., (2013) 351 ITR 0057, dated Parasnath Fue…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 12(2)(2), Mumbai vs. Group M Media (India) Private Limited, Mumbai

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue and cross objection filed by the assessee are stand dismissed

ITA 3087/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhco No. 137/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2011-12) Group M Media (India) Vs. Dcit-12(2)(2) Pvt. Ltd. Room No. 145, 1 St Floor, 8Th Floor, Commerz Aayakar Bhavan, International Business M.K. Road, Park, Oberoi Garden Mumbai-400020 City, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (E), Mumbai-400063 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccm7365H Appellant .. Respondent Dcit-12(2)(2) Vs. Group M Media (India) Room No. 145, 1 St Floor, Pvt. Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan, 8Th Floor, Commerz M.K. Road, International Business Mumbai-400020 Park, Oberoi Garden City, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (E), Mumbai-400063 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccm7365H Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri. Nikhil Tiwari Respondent By : Shri. Ganesh Rakh Date Of Hearing 27.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.10 .2023

For Appellant: Shri. Nikhil TiwariFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh Rakh

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

…ati S. Shah (231 ITR 1) (Bom HC).  CIT Vs. Ganibhai Wahabbhai (1998) 232 ITR 900(MP)  Dwarka Prasad 63 ITD 1 (Pat) (TM)  Abhay Kumar Shroff 63 ITD 144 (Pat) (TM)  K. Venkataramiah Vs. A. Seetharama Reddy AIR 1963 (SC) 1526  Rajmoti Industries (1995) 52 ITD 286 11. On the other hand, the Ld. DR supported the order of lower authorities. P a g e | 10 ITA No. 2760, 3087/Mum/2019 & CO 137/Mum/2021 M/s Group Media M (India) Pvt. Ltd. 12. Heard both the sides and perused the material on record. During the course of assessment the AO found that the assessee had debited deposits written off amounting to ₹ 42,7…

Anchor Electricals Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai vs. Jt. CIT - Ccc- 7(2)`, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4940/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Rahul Chaudharyanchor Electricals Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Private Limited Income-Tax, Central 3Rd Floor, I-Think Techno Circle-7(2) Campus, Pokhran Road Room No.655, 6Th Floor, No.2, Thane (W), Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. 400607 Road, Mumbai - 400020 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaeca2190C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: M.P. Lohia &For Respondent: Yogesh Kamat

Section 143(3)Section 234CSection 271(1)(c)Section 274

…ati S. Shah 231 ITR 1 (Bom). ii. CIT Vs. Ganibhai Wahabbhai (1998) 232 ITR 900 (MP) iii. Dwarka Prasad 63 ITD 1 (Pat) (TM) iv. Abhay Kumar Shroff 63 ITD 144 (Pat (TM) v. K. Venkataramiah Vs. A. Seetharama Reddy AIR 1963 (SC) 1526 vi. Rajmoti Industries (1995) 52 ITD 286.” We have perused the additional evidences furnished by the assessee and also perused the finding of the DRP, it is observed that DRP had not directed the assessee to furnish any other evidences before rejecting the plea of the assessee on incorrect adjustment made pertaining to technical knowhow to the amount of Rs.25,22,618/-. Therefore, we adm…

Shri Deepesh Savla, Vidisha vs. The ITO, Vidisha

ITA 500/IND/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borada.Y. 2008-09

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 44ASection 69Section 69A

…es, we admit the application for additional evidences. Our view is fortified with the ratio laid down in the cases of CIT vs. KUm. Satya Setia (1983) 37 CTR 66 (MP); CIT vs. Gani Bhai Wahab Bhai (1998) 145 CTR 526 (MP) and Rajmoti Industries vs. ITO (1995) 52 ITD 286 (Ahd.). Thus, totality of facts clearly suggests that additional evidences requires deliberation at the level of the Assessing Officer, therefore, in the interest of justice, the assessee’s matter should be reconsidered by the Assessing Officer afresh. Accordingly, the orders of the Revenue Authorities are set aside and the matter is restored ba…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S Spice Communication Ltd., Noida

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 988/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 May 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. I.C. Sudhir & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2006-07 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Spice Communication Ltd., Tax, Circle 9(1), Room No. 163, C/O- Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, C.R. Building, New Delhi Sector-64, Noida. Gir/Pan : Aagcs6070H (Appellant) (Respondent) & C.O. No. 77/Del/2011 [In Ita No. 988/Del/2011] Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/S. Spice Communication Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income C/O- Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, Tax, Circle 9(1), Room No. 163, Sector-64, Noida. C.R. Building, New Delhi Gir/Pan : Aagcs6070H (Appellant) (Respondent) & Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/S. Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, Vs. Acit, Circle-50(1), New Delhi Sector-64, Noida Gir/Pan : Aaacb2100P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Ronak G. Doshi, Ca Department By Sh. B.K. Singh, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 05.04.2016 Date Of Pronouncement 25.05.2016 & C.O. No. 77/Del/2011

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 Deputy Commissioner of Income Vs. M/s. Spice Communication Ltd., Tax, Circle 9(1), Room No. 163, C/o- Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, C.R. Building, New Delhi Sector-64, Noida. GIR/PAN : AAGCS6070H (Appellant) (Respondent) And C.O. No. 77/Del/2011 [In ITA No. 988/Del/2011] Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Spice Communication Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income C/o- Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, Tax, Circle 9(1), Room No. 163, Sector-64, Noida. C.R. Building,…

Idea Cellular Ltd., Noida vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 801/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 May 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. I.C. Sudhir & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2006-07 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Spice Communication Ltd., Tax, Circle 9(1), Room No. 163, C/O- Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, C.R. Building, New Delhi Sector-64, Noida. Gir/Pan : Aagcs6070H (Appellant) (Respondent) & C.O. No. 77/Del/2011 [In Ita No. 988/Del/2011] Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/S. Spice Communication Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income C/O- Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, Tax, Circle 9(1), Room No. 163, Sector-64, Noida. C.R. Building, New Delhi Gir/Pan : Aagcs6070H (Appellant) (Respondent) & Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/S. Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, Vs. Acit, Circle-50(1), New Delhi Sector-64, Noida Gir/Pan : Aaacb2100P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Ronak G. Doshi, Ca Department By Sh. B.K. Singh, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 05.04.2016 Date Of Pronouncement 25.05.2016 & C.O. No. 77/Del/2011

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 Deputy Commissioner of Income Vs. M/s. Spice Communication Ltd., Tax, Circle 9(1), Room No. 163, C/o- Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, C.R. Building, New Delhi Sector-64, Noida. GIR/PAN : AAGCS6070H (Appellant) (Respondent) And C.O. No. 77/Del/2011 [In ITA No. 988/Del/2011] Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Spice Communication Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income C/o- Idea Cellular Ltd., A-68, Tax, Circle 9(1), Room No. 163, Sector-64, Noida. C.R. Building,…

Manisha Bipin Bhinsara, Mumbai vs. ITO WD 25(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA N0

ITA 4512/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 May 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 4512/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10) Mrs. Manisha Bipin The Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ Bhinsara, Ward 25(2)(2), V. 501/A, Yogi Ratna, Bandra Kurla Complex, Opp Mogaveera Bank, Mumbai – 400 051. Eksar Road, Borivali (West), Mumbai – 400 092. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Amlpb7464N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri V.S. Jadhav,DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

…he file of the AO for de-novo determination of the issues after considering the additional evidences on merits. The ld. Counsel relied upon the following case laws to contend that additional evidences should be admitted. 1. Rajmoti Industries v. ITO , (1995) 52 ITD 286 (Ahm. Trib.) 2. CIT v. GTL (Bom High Court) dated 4-12-2014 – Appeal No. 1675 of 2012. ITA 4512/Mum/2015 8 3. Mascon Global v. ACIT, (2010)133 TTJ 257 (Chennai((TM), 4. GE Energy Parts Inc. v. ADIT (2014)106 DTR 265 (Del.-Trib.) 5. Abhay Shroff v. ITO, (1997) 63 ITD 144 (1997)(Pat)(TM) approving 52 ITD 286 (Ahm) 6. DCIT v. Oman International Bank…

Rajmoti Industries v. ITO

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Rajmoti Industries v. ITO