Rajender Kumar Sehgal v. ITO

260 Taxmann 412High Court2019#4751 most cited

What is Rajender Kumar Sehgal v. ITO authority for?

A notice issued to a deceased assessee or their legal representatives beyond the period of limitation is without jurisdiction and cannot be saved by Section 292B.

25

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Rajender Kumar Sehgal v. ITO · Section 292B · Section 148 · legal representative · deceased assessee · notice beyond limitation · without jurisdiction · unenforceable · reassessment proceedings · Section 159(2)(b)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Rajender Kumar Sehgal v. ITO

Samadhan Krishna Katekar, Raigad vs. ITO WD 3 Panvel, Navi Mumbai

In the result the ground No

ITA 3112/MUM/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri M. Balaganeshmr. Samadhan Krishna Ito. Ward-3, Katekar, L/H Of Late Krishna Vs. Panvel Range, Trifed Tower, Kathari Katekar, Opp. Khanda Colony, At Dhutum, Taluka-Uran, Navi Mumbai-410206. District-Raigad. Pan: Azrpk4713E Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Mr. Prakash Pandit (Advocate) Respondent By : Shri Satish Rajore (Sr. Dr) Date Of Hearing : 10.06.2019 Date Of Pronouncement :12.06.2019 Order Under Section 254(1)Of Income Tax Act Per Pawan Singh; 1. This Appeal Under Section 253 Of Income Tax Act (Act) Is Directed Against

For Appellant: Mr. Prakash Pandit (Advocate)For Respondent: Shri Satish Rajore (Sr. DR)
Section 132Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2(47)Section 253Section 254(1)

…IN THE INCOMETAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL “G” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mr. Samadhan Krishna ITO. Ward-3, Katekar, L/H of Late Krishna Vs. Panvel Range, Trifed Tower, Kathari Katekar, Opp. Khanda Colony, AT Dhutum, Taluka-Uran, Navi Mumbai-410206. District-Raigad. PAN: AZRPK4713E Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Mr. Prakash Pandit (Advocate) Respondent by : Shri Satish Rajore (Sr. DR) Date of Hearing : 10.06.2019 Date of Pronouncement :12.06.2019 ORDER UNDER SECTION 254(1)OF INCOME TAX ACT PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER; 1. This appeal und…

Gurtej Singh L/H Lt. Avtar Singh, Panchkula vs. ITO, Panchkula

In the result, the appeal of the appellant is hereby allowed

ITA 1103/CHANDI/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Mar 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1103/Chd/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Shri Gurtej Singh, The Ito, Ward- 1, बनाम L/H Late Sh. Avtar Singh, Panchkula Village – Johluwala, P.O. Nanakpur Tehsil-Kalka, Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Gawps9985Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 292B

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, ‘A’, CHANDIGARH "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य एवं "ीमती अ"नपूणा" गु"ता, लेखा सद"य BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Ms. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1103/CHD/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Shri Gurtej Singh, The ITO, Ward- 1, बनाम L/H Late Sh. Avtar Singh, Panchkula Village – Johluwala, P.O. Nanakpur Tehsil-Kalka, Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN No: GAWPS9985Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : None राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. C…