Rajeev Kumar Agarwal v. Addl. CIT
45 Taxmann.com 555Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2014#2198 most cited
What is Rajeev Kumar Agarwal v. Addl. CIT authority for?
The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction or non-remittance of TDS does not apply if the assessee establishes that the recipient has already declared the corresponding income and paid tax on it, as there is no actual loss of revenue. This principle, reflected in the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia), applies retrospectively.
53
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Rajeev Kumar Agarwal v. Addl. CIT · Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance · second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) · retrospective applicability · no loss of revenue · recipient paid tax · TDS default · Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages · Agra ITAT
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Rajeev Kumar Agarwal v. Addl. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 53 · Page 1 of 3