Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT

466 ITR 474High Court2024#2191 most cited

What is Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

Reassessment notices under Section 148A, issued in the context of faceless assessment proceedings, must be issued by the designated Faceless Assessing Officer and not by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer.

53

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Jatinder Singh Banghu · Jyoti Sareen · Union of India · Section 148A · faceless assessment · reassessment notice validity · Jurisdictional Assessing Officer · Faceless Assessing Officer · jurisdiction to issue notice · Section 151A · 466 ITR 474 · order under section 148A(d)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT

Bses Yamuna Power Ltd, Delhi vs. ACIT, Circle-5(1), New Del;Hi

The appeal of the assessee is allowed on legal issues

ITA 4853/DEL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Apr 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwalbses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Dy. Cit, Bses Bhawan, Cicle-5(1), Nehru Place, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi-110019 Pan-Aagcs3187H (Appellant) (Respondent) Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Asst. Cit, Bses Bhawan, Cicle-5(1), Nehru Place, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi-110019 Pan-Aagcs3187H (Appellant) (Respondent) Bses Yamuna Power Dy. Cit, Limited, Cicle-5(1), Shakti Kiran Building, Vs. New Delhi. Karkardoooma, Delhi-110092 Pan-Aagcs3187H (Appellant) (Respondent) Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Ors Vs. Acit Bses Yamuna Power Asst. Cit, Limited, Cicle-5(1), Shakti Kiran Building, Vs. New Delhi. Karkardoooma, Delhi-110092 Pan-Aagcs3187H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Sh. Deepesh Jain, Adv. & Sh. Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Mr. Javed Akhtar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16/04/2025 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 250

…tes that reassessment proceedings are initiated on reappraisal of exiting facts and not on the basis of any new tangible material, which is not permissible in law: Atma Ram properties Pvt. Ltd v. DCIT: [2012] 343 ITR 141 (Del.) Satnam Overseas v. ACIT: [2010] 228 CTR 121 (Del.) Ashok Mittal v. ACIT: [2014] 224 Taxman 55 (Del.) CIT v. Orient Craft Ltd: [2013] 354 ITR 536 (Del) 45. It is submitted that on all the aforesaid three issues in respect of which reassessment proceedings were initiated by the assessing officer, it will kindly be appreciated that: (a) the appellant had made adequate and complete disclosures…

Bses Yamuna Power Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle- 5(1), New Delhi

The appeal of the assessee is allowed on legal issues

ITA 4852/DEL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Apr 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwalbses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Dy. Cit, Bses Bhawan, Cicle-5(1), Nehru Place, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi-110019 Pan-Aagcs3187H (Appellant) (Respondent) Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Asst. Cit, Bses Bhawan, Cicle-5(1), Nehru Place, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi-110019 Pan-Aagcs3187H (Appellant) (Respondent) Bses Yamuna Power Dy. Cit, Limited, Cicle-5(1), Shakti Kiran Building, Vs. New Delhi. Karkardoooma, Delhi-110092 Pan-Aagcs3187H (Appellant) (Respondent) Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Ors Vs. Acit Bses Yamuna Power Asst. Cit, Limited, Cicle-5(1), Shakti Kiran Building, Vs. New Delhi. Karkardoooma, Delhi-110092 Pan-Aagcs3187H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Sh. Deepesh Jain, Adv. & Sh. Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Mr. Javed Akhtar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16/04/2025 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 250

…tes that reassessment proceedings are initiated on reappraisal of exiting facts and not on the basis of any new tangible material, which is not permissible in law: Atma Ram properties Pvt. Ltd v. DCIT: [2012] 343 ITR 141 (Del.) Satnam Overseas v. ACIT: [2010] 228 CTR 121 (Del.) Ashok Mittal v. ACIT: [2014] 224 Taxman 55 (Del.) CIT v. Orient Craft Ltd: [2013] 354 ITR 536 (Del) 45. It is submitted that on all the aforesaid three issues in respect of which reassessment proceedings were initiated by the assessing officer, it will kindly be appreciated that: (a) the appellant had made adequate and complete disclosures…

Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (466 ITR 474) — Cited in 53 Judgments | BharatTax