Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT

93 Taxmann.com 296High Court2018#1160 most cited

What is Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Approval granted by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner under Section 151 for reassessment proceedings under Section 148 must reflect due application of mind. A mere endorsement of "approved" without reasons or reference to material is insufficient, as the approval serves as a safeguard and must be meaningful, not ritualistic or formal.

98

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2026.

Also referred to as

SBC Minerals Pvt Ltd v ACIT · Section 151 approval · Section 148 reassessment notice · mechanical approval · application of mind · PCCIT satisfaction · Chief Commissioner approval · reassessment sanction · reasons for approval · income escaping assessment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT

Viswanadh Kandula, Hyderabad vs. DCIT., Circle-6(1), Hyderabad

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 1085/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.1084 To 1088 & 1027/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2019-20) M/S Ace Tyres (P) Ltd Vs. Acit Hyderabad Central Circle 1(2) Pan:Aadca2210N Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri M.V.Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 02/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 24/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Raothese Six Appeals By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Six Separate Orders Dated 29/05/2025, 30/05/2025, 04/06/2025, 096/06/2025, 17/06/2025 & 14/07/2025 Of The Learned Cit (A)-11, Hyderabad Arising From The Assessment Order Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 147 Of The Act, Pursuant To The Search & Seizure Operations U/S 132 Of The Act, Dated 04/01/2023 In Case Of Exel Group Of Companies Including The Assessee For The A.Ys 2014-15 To 2019-20 Respectively. Since Common Issues Are Raised In These Group Of Six Appeals Arising From Same Facts & Search & Seizure Operation, Therefore, For The Sake Of Convenience, All Page 1 Of 78

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Prasad, CAFor Respondent: : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148BSection 149Section 149(1)(b)Section 151

…E Tyres P Ltd i) CIT vs.S Goyanka Line & Chemical Ltd (2015) 56 Taxmann.com 390 (MP) ii) CIT vs.S Goyanka Line & Chemical Ltd (2015) 64 Taxmann.com 313 (SC) iii) United Electrical Co (P) Ltd vs. CIT (2002) 258 ITR 317 iv) SBC Minerals (P) Ltd vs. ACIT (2024) 475 ITR 360 v) P Munirathnam Chetty and P Satyanarayana Chetty vs. Income Tax Officer (1975) 101 ITR 385 (AP). vi) Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Pioneer Town Planners (P) Ltd in ITA No.91/2019 dated 20/02/2024 12. On the other hand, the learned DR has referred to the reasons given by the Pr. CIT (Central) for forwarding the proposal of…