Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Surat-2 v. Shreeji Prints (P.) Ltd.

130 Taxmann.com 294Supreme Court of India2021#1448 most cited

What is Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Surat-2 v. Shreeji Prints (P.) Ltd. authority for?

A plausible view taken by the Assessing Officer, after due enquiry and verification, does not render an assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue for the purpose of revision under Section 263, thereby limiting the scope of revisional powers.

78

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Shreeji Prints · Section 263 · erroneous and prejudicial · plausible view AO · lack of enquiry · inadequate enquiry · scope revisional powers · revision u/s 263

Sections most often in play

Section 263Section 143(3)Section 142(1)Section 147Section 144BSection 148Section 115BBESection 69A

Issues it is cited on

prejudicial to interest of revenuepublic servantsection 263(1)lack of enquiryrevision under section 263inadequate enquiryrevision u/s 263malabar industrialassessment order erroneouserroneous and prejudicialsection 40a(2)(b)on money receipt

Judgments citing Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Surat-2 v. Shreeji Prints (P.) Ltd.

Gora Bai Sahu, Ashok Nagar vs. ITO Ashok Nagar, Ashok Nagar

ITA 35/AGR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra15 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13] Gora Bai Sahu, Income Tax Officer, Shri Ram Charan Sahu & Ashok Nagar, L/H Late Gora Bai, Sony Vs Madhya Pradesh-473331 Colony, Ashok Nagar, Madhya Pradesh-473331 Pan-Fdzps8877N Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Pankaj Gargh, Adv. Respondent By Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 17.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 15.09.2025 Order

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH ‘DB’ AGRA (Through Physical/Virtual Hearing) BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER [Assessment Year: 2012-13] Gora Bai Sahu, Income Tax Officer, Shri Ram Charan Sahu & Ashok Nagar, L/H Late Gora Bai, Sony Vs Madhya Pradesh-473331 Colony, Ashok Nagar, Madhya Pradesh-473331 PAN-FDZPS8877N Appellant Respondent Appellant by Shri Pankaj Gargh, Adv. Respondent by Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing 17.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement 15.09.2025 ORDER PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM, This appeal by the assess…

Surya Roshni Limited, New Delhi vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 7, New Delhi

ITA 1444/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(1)

…ITA Nos.1445 & 1444/Del/2024 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “G” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.1445 & 1444/Del/2024 [Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16] Surya Roshni Limited, 2nd Floor, Padma Tower-1, Rajendra Place, New Delhi-110008. PAN-AAACS3558C vs Pr.CIT-7, Delhi APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Akshat Jain, CA & Shri Rajat Jain, CA Respondent by Shri Mahesh Kumar, CIT DR Date of Hearing 04.06.2025 Date of Pronouncement 28.08.2025 ORDER PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : The captioned appeals are filed by the…

Indur Thanwerdas Dadlani, Mumbai vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax PCIT, Mumbai-42, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed without any order as to cost

ITA 2476/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankarindur Thanwerdas Dadlani Vs. Pr. Cit Flat No. 4604, The Imperial Mumbai – 42 Towers, Mp Mill Compound, Room No. 741, Aayakar Bb Nakashe Marg, Mardeo, Bhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai – 400034. Mumbai Pan/Gir No. Aacpd5262D (Applicant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 263Section 57Section 74

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Indur Thanwerdas Dadlani Vs. Pr. CIT Flat No. 4604, the Imperial Mumbai – 42 Towers, MP Mill Compound, Room No. 741, Aayakar BB Nakashe Marg, Mardeo, Bhavan, MK Road, Mumbai – 400034. Mumbai PAN/GIR No. AACPD5262D (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Rahul Hakani Revenue by Shri. R.A. Dhyani, CIT (DR) Date of Hearing 09.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement 04.08.2025 आदेश / ORDER PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging…

Paras Rameshchandra Doshi, Rajkot vs. The PCIT - 1, Rajkot

ITA 280/RJT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Jun 2025AY 2013-14
Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं./ITA No. 280/RJT/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Hybrid Hearing) Vs. The Pr. CIT – 1, Aayakar Bhavan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot - 360001 Paras Rameshchandra Doshi Prop. Aadhyashakti Trading, Pal Gate Road, Soni Bazar, Rajkot - 360001 (Appellant) स्थायी लेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ABJPD0346E (Respondent) Appellant by Respondent by Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. AR : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT (DR)…

Ashok Kumar Jain, Meerut vs. PCIT, Ghaziabad

In the result, both the appeals filed by appellant/assessee are allowed

ITA 2627/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhita No. 2627/Del/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Ita No.2628/Del/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Ashok Kumar Jain, Vs. Principal Cit, Prop. Mange Lal Prakash Ghaziabad Chand, 45-B Gupta Colony, (Uttar Pradesh) T.P. Nagar, Meerut Pin: 250002 Pan: Aeipj3089E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Piyush Agarwal, Ca Department By: Mr. Javed Akhtar, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 20.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.06.2025 O R D E R Per Vimal Kumar: The Appeals Filed By The Appellant/Assessee Are Against Separate Orders Dated 27.03.2024 Of Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Appeals), Ghaziabad (Hereinafter Referred As ‘Ld. Pcit’ ) Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred As “The Act”) Arising Out Of Separate Assessment Orders, Both Dated 29.03.2022 Of National Faceless Appeal Centre(Nfac), Delhi (Hereinafter Referred As “Ld. Ao”) Under Section 147 R.W.S. 144B Of The Act For Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15 Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Piyush Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Mr. Javed Akhtar, CIT (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 2627/DEL/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 ITA No.2628/DEL/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Ashok Kumar Jain, Vs. Principal CIT, Prop. Mange Lal Prakash Ghaziabad Chand, 45-B Gupta Colony, (Uttar Pradesh) T.P. Nagar, Meerut PIN: 250002 PAN: AEIPJ3089E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Piyush Agarwal, CA Department by: Mr. Javed Akhtar, CIT (DR) Date of Hearing: 20.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 06.06.2025 O R D E R PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The ap…

Dlf Home Developers Limited, New Delhi vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2585/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2019-20] Dlf Home Developers Limited, Vs Pr.Cit, 9Th Floor, Dlf Centre, Sansad Delhi-1, Marg, New Delhi-110001. New Delhi Pan-Aaccd0037H Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri R.S.Singhvi, Ca & Shri Satyajeet Goel, Ca Respondent By Shri Surender Pal, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 19.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23.05.2025

Section 143(3)Section 263

…ITA No.2585/Del/2024 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “B” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER [Assessment Year : 2019-20] DLF Home Developers Limited, vs Pr.CIT, 9th Floor, DLF Centre, Sansad Delhi-1, Marg, New Delhi-110001. New Delhi PAN-AACCD0037H APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri R.S.Singhvi, CA & Shri Satyajeet Goel, CA Respondent by Shri Surender Pal, CIT DR Date of Hearing 19.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement 23.05.2025 ORDER PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : The present appeal has been filed by the assessee seeking to assail the order d…

Venetian Ldf Projects LLP, Gurgaon vs. ACIT Circle-4(1), Gurgaon

In the result, grounds raised by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 3533/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40A(2)

…ITA No. 3533/Del/2025 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.3533/Del./2025, A.Y. 2021-22 Amazon Smart Commerce Solutions Vs. Principal Commissioner of Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax, H-9, Block B-1, Delhi-1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044, New Delhi PAN: AAECT4063H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate, Smt. Deepashree Rao, Advocate Ms. Ayushi Pragya, Advocate Revenue by Ms. Amish S. Gupt, CIT- DR Date of Hearing 15/01/2026 Date of Pronouncem…

M/S. Sarju Vitrified Pvt. Ltd., Morbi-363641 vs. The Pr. CIT-1, Rajkot

ITA 83/RJT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Apr 2025AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68Section 68o

…M/s.Sarju Vitrified P Ltd. ITA No.83/RJT/2023 (AY: 2018-19) 2 1. The order u/s. 263 of the Act is bad in law. 2.The learned Pr. CIT has erred in law as well as on facts in not considering the submissions of the assessee on the strength of which the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of revenue and therefore, the provisions of Section 263 of the Act were not applicable to the case of the assessee. 3.The learned Pr. CIT has erred in law as well as on facts in not appreciating that under the provisions of Section 68 as applicable to the year under appeal, the assessee was not requ…

Grant Medical Foundation, Pune vs. Income Tax Office, Exemption Circle, Pune

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1193/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Khare (through virtual)For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar – CIT-DR
Section 10Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2018-19 Grant Medical Foundation CIT Exemption, Pune 40, Sassoon Road, Vs. Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune – 411001 PAN: AAATP1145P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Rahul Khare (through virtual) Department by : Shri Amol Khairnar – CIT-DR Date of hearing : 02-12-2024 Date of pronouncement : 20-02-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, VP : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30.03.2024 passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (h…

Vaneet Gupta, S.O. Sh. Chattur Bhuj Gupta, #214, Sector-06, Panchkula vs. PCIT Panchkula Jurisdictional Assessing Officer ITO Ward 5, Panchkula

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 560/CHANDI/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Jan 2025AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 560/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vaneet Gupta, Vs. The Ito, बनाम S.O. Shri Chattur Bhuj Ward 5, Gupta, Panchkula # 214, Sector 6, Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aphpg0692N अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04.12.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20.01.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘B’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT & DR KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 560/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vaneet Gupta, Vs. The ITO, बनाम S.O. Shri Chattur Bhuj Ward 5, Gupta, Panchkula # 214, Sector 6, Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN No: APHPG0692N अपीलाथ"/ APPELLANT ""यथ"/ REPSONDENT ( Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 0…

Alok Vijawat, Jaipur vs. PCIT, Udaipur

ITA 605/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Devang Gargieya, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…1 आयकरअपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुरन्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh]U;kf;dlnL; ,oaJhjkBksMdeys'kt;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;djvihy la-@ITA No. 605/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.ko"kZ@AssessmentYear : 2019-20 Shri Alok Vijawat cuke The PCIT Vs. Udaipur Station Road, Masjid Ke Samne Bhawani Mandi, Jhalawar 326 502 LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AERPV0538 B vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Devang Gargieya, Advocate jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: M…

Bhupinder Singh Son of Sh. Gurmukh Singh, Punjab vs. The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Chandigarh-1, C.R Building Himalaya Marg, Sector 17-E, Chandigarh, Punjab

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 825/CHANDI/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Nov 2024AY 2012-2013

Bench: SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 144Section 253Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी कृणव"त सहाय, लेखा सद"य एवं "ी परेश म. जोशी, "याियक सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM & SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI, JM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 825/Chd/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Bhupinder Singh बनाम The Pr. CIT S/o Shri Gurmukh Singh Chandigarh-1 Vill: Doomcherri, PO: Morinda Tehsil: Chamkaur Sahib, Dist: Ropar- Punjab- 140001 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: CSEPS2191A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate…

Shri Hiteshkumar Patel, Anand vs. The Pr. CIT-1, Vadodara

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 173/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40Section 68

…ITA No.173/Ahd/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 Hiteshkumar Patel, The Principal Commissioner of 5, Shree Nagar Society, Income Tax-1, Nr. Pioneer School, Vadodara – 1. Anand – 388 001. Vs. (Gujarat) [PAN – AEPPP 4893 R] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Manish J. Shah, AR Revenue by Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 10.07.2024 Date of Pronouncement 09.09.2024 O R D E R PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEM…

Shri Bhanvarlal Champalal Kanuga, Unjha vs. The Pr. CIT-3, Ahmeabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 95/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.95/Ahd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Bhanvarlal Champalal The Principal Cit बनाम/ Kanuga Range-3 C/O. Ketan H. Shah, Advocate Pratyakash Kar Bhavan V/S. 512, Times Square – I Ahmedabad Opp. Ram Baug Bungalows Nr. Ravija Plaza Thaltej-Shilaj Road Ahmedabad – 380 059. (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Acmpk 0172 H अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ketan H. Shah, Ar & Shri Aman Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Pushpendra Singh Chaudhary, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 07/08/2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 23/08/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee As Against The Order Dated 29/03/2022 Passed By The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Ahmedabad [Hereinafter Referred To As “Pcit(A)” In Short] In Exercise Of The Shri Bhanvarlal Champalal Kanuga Vs. Pr.Cit-3 Asst. Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Ketan H. Shah, AR &For Respondent: Shri Pushpendra Singh
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ “ए“, अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद । अहमदाबाद IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ A ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD सु"ी सु"च"ा का"बले, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मकरंद वसंत महादेवकर, लेखा सद"य के सम"। ] ] BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.95/Ahd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Bhanvarlal Champalal The Principal CIT बनाम/ Kanuga Range-3 C/o. Ketan H. Shah, Advocate Pratyakash Kar Bhavan v/s.…

M/S.Hdb Financial Services Ltd., Ahmedabad vs. The Pr. CIT-1, Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 177/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 80J

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year 2017-18 HDB Financial Services The Pr.CIT-1, Ltd., Ahmedabad 2nd Floor, Radhika, Vs Law Garden Road, (Respondent) Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380009 PAN: AABCH8761M (Appellant) Assessee Represented: Shri Vartik Chokshi, A.R. & Shri Biren Shah, A.R. Revenue Represented: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CIT-D.R. Date of hearing : 06-12-2023 Date of pronouncement : 24-01-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This appeal is filed by the Asses…

Sourabh Sharma, Jaipur vs. PCIT, Jaipur-2, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 240/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar (CIT) a
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 240/JP/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2018-19 Sourabh Sharma cuke PCIT, 58, Gom Defense Colony, 5th Vs. Jaipur-2 Avenue, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ADPPS 2335 E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Mahendra Gargieya (Adv.) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Reve…

A3Logics (India) Private Limited, Jaipur vs. PCIT, Jaipur -1, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 190/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 201Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 40a

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 190/JP/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2018-19 cuke A3logics (India) Private Limited PCIT, Vs. H 1-458-460, Sitapura Jaipur Jaipur-1 LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAHCA 9763 A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. Mahendra Gargieya (Adv.) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh.…

Gayatri Devi, Jaipur vs. PCIT(Central), Jaipur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 405/JPR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Sept 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Ajay Malik, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh]U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 405/JPR/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2019-20 cuke Gayatri Devi Pr. CIT Vs. Rathunath Puri Daba Takhta Tonk Central, Jaipur Tonk 304 001 Jaipur LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ALJPD 4796 L vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Mahendra Gargieya Advocate & Ms. Veshnawi Joshi, Ad…

Jai Salasar Balaji Industries(P)Ltd, Kolkata vs. ACIT, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per the terms indicated above

ITA 440/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 440/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Jai Salasar Balaji Industries (P) Ltd. Acit, Central Circle – 4(1), Kolkata 5, Bentinck Street Vs Kolkata - 700001 [Pan : Aaacj6970D] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri A.K. Tulsiyan, Fca Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 20/06/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 25/08/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Kolkata -2, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”) Dt. 28/03/2023, Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Private Limited Company Engaged In The Business Of Manufacturing & Trading Of Steel. E-Return Filed On 27/10/2018 Declaring Total Income At Nil For The Assessment Year 2018-19. Case Selected For Through Cass Followed By Issuance Of Notice U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act. Details Were Called For In Respect Of The Reason Of Scrutiny Selection. The Assessee Complied By Filing All The Relevant Details & The Same Were Duly Examined By The Assessing Officer & He Came To The Conclusion That The Assessee Was Entitled To The Claim Of Carry Forward Of Loss To 2

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, कोलकाता | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 440/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Jai Salasar Balaji Industries (P) Ltd. ACIT, Central Circle – 4(1), Kolkata 5, Bentinck Street Vs Kolkata - 700001 [PAN : AAACJ6970D] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri A.K. Tulsiyan, FCA Revenue by : Shri Subhendu Datta, CIT, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 20/06/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 25/08/2023 आदेश/O R D E R PER DR. M…

Shri Tifs Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd., Rajkot vs. The Pr. CIT-1, Rajkot

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 115/RJT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot23 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Darshak Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT (Conducted through E-Court at Ahmedabad) BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.115/Rjt/2023 (Assessment Year: 2018-19) TIFS Credit Cooperative Society Vs. The Principal Commissioner of Ltd., Income Tax, Poonam Apartment, Sadar Bazar, Rajkot-1 Rajkot-360001 [PAN No.AAAAT2411M] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Darshak Thakkar, A.R. Respondent by: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT DR Date of Hearing 10.08.2023 Date of Pronouncement 23.08.2023 O R D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JM: This ap…