Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 v. Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd.

113 Taxmann.com 303High Court2020#2103 most cited

What is Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 v. Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. authority for?

The Assessing Officer (AO) must record dissatisfaction with the assessee's suo motu disallowance under Section 14A for an addition to be made. If the AO fails to record such dissatisfaction, either expressly or inferentially, the disallowance made by the assessee should be accepted.

55

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. · Section 14A · suo motu disallowance · Assessing Officer dissatisfaction · Rule 8D disallowance · absence of dissatisfaction · deleted addition · expenditure disallowance

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 v. Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd.

Mahanagar Gas Limited, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 488/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2018-19 Mahanagar Gas Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Mgl House, G33, Income Tax Vs. Bandra Kurla Complex, Circle 14(2)(1), Mumbai- 400051. Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai. Pan: Aabcm4640G (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri P. P. Jayaraman, A.R. Revenue By : Shri P.D. Chougule (Addl. Cit), Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing : 27 . 05 . 2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 26 . 06 . 2024 O R D E R Per: Ratnesh Nandan Sahay: 1. This Appeal Has Been Filed Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit Appeal Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act [The ‘Act’ In Short] Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/ S/250/2023-24/1059081791(1) Dated 26/12/2023 For Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. Following Grounds Of Appeal Have Been Raised: “1. Disallowance U/S 14A R.W.R 8D: That On The Facts & The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Has Erred In Making

For Appellant: Shri P. P. Jayaraman, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.D. Chougule (Addl. CIT), SR. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Mahanagar Gas Limited Deputy Commissioner of MGL House, G33, Income Tax Vs. Bandra Kurla Complex, Circle 14(2)(1), Mumbai- 400051. Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai. PAN: AABCM4640G (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri P. P. Jayaraman, A.R. Revenue by : Shri P.D. Chougule (Addl. CIT), SR. D.R. Date of Hearing : 27 . 05 . 2024 Date of Pronouncement : 26 . 06 . 2024 O R D E R Per: Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Accountant Member: 1. This a…