Pradeep Amrutlal Runwal v. Tax Recovery Officer

47 Taxmann.com 293Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2014#2529 most cited

What is Pradeep Amrutlal Runwal v. Tax Recovery Officer authority for?

Additions to income cannot be made solely on the basis of loose papers or notings found during a search in the premises of a third party, especially when there is no corroborative evidence to suggest that the assessee actually received the amounts or made payments.

46

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Pradeep Amrutlal Runwal · ITAT · section 132 · section 69A · loose papers · notings · third party premises · corroborative evidence · addition without evidence · search proceedings

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pradeep Amrutlal Runwal v. Tax Recovery Officer

Rakesh Kumar Bansal, Gujrat vs. DCIT, Central Cercle, Ghaziabad

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 2516/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2515/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 बनाम Geeta Bansal Dcit Ch. No. 206-207, Vs. Central Circle Ansal Satyam Rdc, Ghaziabad. Rajnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002 Pan No. Aispb9075G अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2516/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 बनाम Rakesh Kumar Bansal Dcit Ch. No. 206-207, Vs. Central Circle Ansal Satyam Rdc, Ghaziabad. Rajnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002 Pan No. Abwpb1370M अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 127Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153Section 153CSection 292CSection 69

…T Vs. Anil Khandelwal [ITA No. 247 & 248/2015 dated 21.04.2015]; 2. PCIT(Central)-II Vs. Umesh Ishrani [108 Taxmann.com 437] (Bom.); 3. Brijbhushan Singhal Vs. ACIT [ITA No. 1415 to 1417/Del/2018 dated 07.02.2018 ITAT (Del.)]; 4. Pradeep Amrit Lal Vs. TRO [149 ITD 548] (Pune). 11. The Ld. Counsel further submits that the electronic evidence cannot be accepted in the absence of any corroborative evidence on record and certificate in terms of section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence 8 I.T.A.Nos.2515 & 2516/Del/2022 Act, 1872. The assessment made by the AO on the foundation of such non-est material is devoid of a…

Geeta Bansal, Gujrat vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Ghaziabad

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 2515/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2515/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 बनाम Geeta Bansal Dcit Ch. No. 206-207, Vs. Central Circle Ansal Satyam Rdc, Ghaziabad. Rajnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002 Pan No. Aispb9075G अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2516/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 बनाम Rakesh Kumar Bansal Dcit Ch. No. 206-207, Vs. Central Circle Ansal Satyam Rdc, Ghaziabad. Rajnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002 Pan No. Abwpb1370M अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 127Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153Section 153CSection 292CSection 69

…T Vs. Anil Khandelwal [ITA No. 247 & 248/2015 dated 21.04.2015]; 2. PCIT(Central)-II Vs. Umesh Ishrani [108 Taxmann.com 437] (Bom.); 3. Brijbhushan Singhal Vs. ACIT [ITA No. 1415 to 1417/Del/2018 dated 07.02.2018 ITAT (Del.)]; 4. Pradeep Amrit Lal Vs. TRO [149 ITD 548] (Pune). 11. The Ld. Counsel further submits that the electronic evidence cannot be accepted in the absence of any corroborative evidence on record and certificate in terms of section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence 8 I.T.A.Nos.2515 & 2516/Del/2022 Act, 1872. The assessment made by the AO on the foundation of such non-est material is devoid of a…

Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai Patel, Jamnagar vs. The ITO Ward-3(2), Jamnagar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 105/RJT/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot25 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 103 To 105/Rjt/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Patel Ward 3(2), Jamnagar Vs. Plot No.3990, Gidc, Phase-Iii, Dared, Jamnagar "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Actpp6152H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से / Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. D.R. Respondent By : सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of 01/11/2022 Hearing घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of 25/01/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R Per Ms. Madhumita Roy - Jm: This Bunch Of Three Appeals At The Instance Of The Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders Dated 28.07.2021 (For A.Ys. 2008-09 & 2011-12) & 27.07.2021 (For A.Y. 2010-11) Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 147

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “RAJKOT” BENCH, RAJKOT [Conducted through E-Court at Ahmedabad] BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 103 to 105/Rjt/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Patel Ward 3(2), Jamnagar Vs. Plot No.3990, GIDC, Phase-III, Dared, Jamnagar "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ACTPP6152H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant by : Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से / Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. D.R. R…

Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai Patel, Jamnagar vs. The ITO Ward-3(2), Jamnagar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 104/RJT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot25 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 103 To 105/Rjt/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Patel Ward 3(2), Jamnagar Vs. Plot No.3990, Gidc, Phase-Iii, Dared, Jamnagar "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Actpp6152H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से / Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. D.R. Respondent By : सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of 01/11/2022 Hearing घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of 25/01/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R Per Ms. Madhumita Roy - Jm: This Bunch Of Three Appeals At The Instance Of The Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders Dated 28.07.2021 (For A.Ys. 2008-09 & 2011-12) & 27.07.2021 (For A.Y. 2010-11) Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 147

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “RAJKOT” BENCH, RAJKOT [Conducted through E-Court at Ahmedabad] BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 103 to 105/Rjt/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Patel Ward 3(2), Jamnagar Vs. Plot No.3990, GIDC, Phase-III, Dared, Jamnagar "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ACTPP6152H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant by : Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से / Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. D.R. R…

Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai Patel, Jamnagar vs. The ITO Ward-3(2), Jamnagar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 103/RJT/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot25 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 103 To 105/Rjt/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Patel Ward 3(2), Jamnagar Vs. Plot No.3990, Gidc, Phase-Iii, Dared, Jamnagar "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Actpp6152H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से / Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. D.R. Respondent By : सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of 01/11/2022 Hearing घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of 25/01/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R Per Ms. Madhumita Roy - Jm: This Bunch Of Three Appeals At The Instance Of The Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders Dated 28.07.2021 (For A.Ys. 2008-09 & 2011-12) & 27.07.2021 (For A.Y. 2010-11) Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 147

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “RAJKOT” BENCH, RAJKOT [Conducted through E-Court at Ahmedabad] BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 103 to 105/Rjt/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Shri Kanjibhai Tapubhai The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Patel Ward 3(2), Jamnagar Vs. Plot No.3990, GIDC, Phase-III, Dared, Jamnagar "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ACTPP6152H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant by : Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से / Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. D.R. R…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-3, Thane vs. Sonam Builders, Mumbai

In the result appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 2926/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Apr 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.2926/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) बिधम/ Dcit, Cc-3 M/S. Sonam Builders Shanti Niwas, 1St Floor Room No.10, A-Wing, Vs. 6Th Floor, Ashar I.T.Park New Golden Road No.16-Z, Wagle Nest Phase Xiii, 100 Industrial Estate, Thane(W) Ft.Road, Opp. Hanuman Mandir, Bhayander(E), Dist.Thane-401 105 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aacfs3498J (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Purushottam Tripuri,Cit-Dr Assessee By: Shri Vimal Punmiya, Ar सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 23/02/2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/04/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 28/02/2019 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -11, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2013- 14. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds: - 1. "On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.8,17,50/- Made On Account Of Unaccounted Sales Of Car Parking Area, Not Included In The Sale Of Agreements Of The Flats. A.Y.2013-14 Ii) On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.,50,000/- Made On Account Of Unaccounted Income On F.S.I Sale, Without Appreciating The Fact, That The Assessee Has Failed To Prove, The Sale Consideration Mentioned In The Seized Unsigned Agreement Is Not True.

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Purushottam Tripuri,CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 145Section 80GSection 80I

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.2926/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) बिधम/ DCIT, CC-3 M/s. Sonam Builders Shanti Niwas, 1st Floor Room No.10, A-Wing, Vs. 6th Floor, Ashar I.T.Park New Golden Road No.16-Z, Wagle Nest Phase XIII, 100 Industrial Estate, Thane(W) Ft.Road, Opp. Hanuman Mandir, Bhayander(E), Dist.Thane-401 105 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AACFS3498J (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue by: Shri Purushottam Tripuri,CIT-DR A…

JCIT (OSD) 8(1)(1), Mumbai vs. Shri Sanjay Parmar, Mumbai

In the result revenues appeal stands dismissed

ITA 3534/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Amarjit Singhjcit(Osd)-8(1)(1), M/S Sanjay V. Parmar, Room No. 625, 6Th Floor, 3,2 Ooranwala Mansion, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Dr. B.A. Road, Parel, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400012. Vs Pan: Aaacs6498M Appellant Respondent C.O. No.61/Mum/2020 (Assessment Year 2014-15) M/S Sanjay V. Parmar, Jcit(Osd)-8(1)(1), Room No. 625, 6Th Floor, 3,2 Ooranwala Mansion, Dr. B.A. Road, Parel, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400012. Mumbai-400020. Vs Pan: Aaacs6498M Appellant Respondent : Shri T.S. Khalsa (Dr) Appellant By Revenue By : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala (Ar) Date Of Hearing : 22.02.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.03.2021 Order

For Respondent: Shri T.S. Khalsa (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 69B

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER JCIT(OSD)-8(1)(1), M/s Sanjay V. Parmar, Room No. 625, 6th Floor, 3,2 Ooranwala Mansion, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Dr. B.A. Road, Parel, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400012. Vs PAN: AAACS6498M Appellant Respondent C.O. No.61/Mum/2020 (Assessment Year 2014-15) M/s Sanjay V. Parmar, JCIT(OSD)-8(1)(1), Room No. 625, 6th Floor, 3,2 Ooranwala Mansion, Dr. B.A. Road, Parel, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400012. Mumbai-400020. Vs PAN: AAACS6498M Appellant Respondent : Shri T.S. Khal…