Boeing International Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 1127/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2018AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2010-11 Boeing International Corporation Vs. Dcit, India Pvt. Ltd., Circle-5(1), 3Rd Floor, Dlf Centre, New Delhi. Sansad Marg, New Delhi. Pan: Aaccb3303J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kanchun Kaushal, Ar Revenue By : Shri Sanjay I Bara, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.10.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.10.2018 Order Per N.K. Billaiya, Am: With This Appeal, The Assessee Has Challenged The Correctness Of The Order Dated 17.02.2014 Framed U/S 143(3) Read With Section 147C Read With Section 92Ca(3) Of The Act. 2. The Sum & Substance Of The Grievance Of The Assessee Is That The Drp/Tpo/A.O. Erred In Enhancing The Income Of The Assessee By Rs.13,38,73,412/- And, In Doing So, Arbitrarily Selected Companies Engaged In Performing Services Which Are Functionally Different From The Business Development, Advisory & Other Support
For Appellant: Shri Kanchun Kaushal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay I Bara, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147CSection 92C
…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : I-1 : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2010-11 Boeing International Corporation Vs. DCIT, India Pvt. Ltd., Circle-5(1), 3rd Floor, DLF Centre, New Delhi. Sansad Marg, New Delhi. PAN: AACCB3303J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Kanchun Kaushal, AR Revenue by : Shri Sanjay I Bara, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 25.10.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 30.10.2018 ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, AM: With this appeal, the assessee has challenged the correctness of the order dated 17.02.2014 fram…