PCIT Vs v. Ramaiah

103 Taxmann.com 202Supreme Court of India2019#2063 most cited

What is PCIT Vs v. Ramaiah authority for?

The Supreme Court, by dismissing the department's SLP, affirmed that the supply of reasons to the assessee is mandatory for reassessment proceedings. Failure to provide reasons before proceeding with reassessment renders such proceedings liable to be quashed.

55

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Ramaiah · Section 147 · Section 148 · Section 151 · supply of reasons · mandatory reasons for reassessment · quashing reassessment proceedings · reopening of assessment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT Vs v. Ramaiah

Swami Keshwanand Shikshan Sansthan, Sikar vs. ITO (Exemption), Ward-2, Jaipur

Appeal is partly allowed

ITA 309/JPR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 Apr 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 309 & 310/Jp/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 Swami Keshwanand Sikshan Cuke I.T.O. (Exemption), Vs. Sansthan, Ward-2, N.H.11, Bhadhadhar, Sikar-332315 Jaipur (Rajasthan). (Raj) Pan No.: Aafts 2816 M Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Shafi Mohammed (Adv) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Jcit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 15/03/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 13/04/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. Both These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-3, Jaipur Dated 17/09/2020 & 10/09/2020 For The A.Y. 2012-13 & 2013-14 Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Shafi Mohammed (Adv)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 10Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…_ Swami Keshwanand Sikshan Sansthan Vs ITO(E) provided has been settled by the Judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court as well as the Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Pr Commissioner of Income Tax V/s V. Ramaiah reported in 103 Taxmann.com 202 (SC) dismissed the SLP filed by the department against the Judgment of Hon’ble High Court. The Hon’ble High Court held that supply of reasons is mandatory and without supply of reasons the reassessment proceedings are liable to be quashed. The Hon’ble High Court upheld the order of the ITAT. The relevant Para of the Judgment of Hon’ble Hi…

M/S. Growmore Research & Assets Management Ltd., Mumbai vs. DCIT Cent. Cir. - 4(3), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 504/MUM/2019[1991-92]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Mar 2021AY 1991-92

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 1991-92 Dcit, M/S. Growmore Research Cent. Cir.-4(3) & Assets Management Central Range-4, Ltd., Room No.1921, 32, Madhuli Apartment, Vs. 19Th Floor, 3Rd Floor, Air India Bldg., Dr. Annie Besant Road, Nariman Point, Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Mumbai - 400021 Pan: Aaacg4936C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 1991-92 M/S. Growmore Research Dcit & Assets Management Cent. Cir.-4(3), Ltd., Central Range-4, 32, Madhuli Apartment, Room No.1921, 3Rd Floor, Vs. 19Th Floor, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Air India Bldg., Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Nariman Point, Pan: Aaacg4936C Mumbai - 400021

For Appellant: Shri Dharmesh Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. P. Daniel, D.R
Section 147Section 14ASection 234Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 1991-92 DCIT, M/s. Growmore Research Cent. Cir.-4(3), & Assets Management Central Range-4, Ltd., Room No.1921, 32, Madhuli Apartment, Vs. 19th Floor, 3rd Floor, Air India Bldg., Dr. Annie Besant Road, Nariman Point, Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Mumbai - 400021 PAN: AAACG4936C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 1991-92 M/s. Growmore Research DCIT, & Assets Management Cent. Cir.-4(3), Ltd., Central Range-4, 32, Madhuli Apartment, Room No.1921, 3rd Flo…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-4(3), Central Range-4, Mumbai vs. M/S.Growmore Research & Asset Management Limited, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1196/MUM/2019[1991-92]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Mar 2021AY 1991-92

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 1991-92 Dcit, M/S. Growmore Research Cent. Cir.-4(3) & Assets Management Central Range-4, Ltd., Room No.1921, 32, Madhuli Apartment, Vs. 19Th Floor, 3Rd Floor, Air India Bldg., Dr. Annie Besant Road, Nariman Point, Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Mumbai - 400021 Pan: Aaacg4936C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 1991-92 M/S. Growmore Research Dcit & Assets Management Cent. Cir.-4(3), Ltd., Central Range-4, 32, Madhuli Apartment, Room No.1921, 3Rd Floor, Vs. 19Th Floor, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Air India Bldg., Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Nariman Point, Pan: Aaacg4936C Mumbai - 400021

For Appellant: Shri Dharmesh Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. P. Daniel, D.R
Section 147Section 14ASection 234Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 1991-92 DCIT, M/s. Growmore Research Cent. Cir.-4(3), & Assets Management Central Range-4, Ltd., Room No.1921, 32, Madhuli Apartment, Vs. 19th Floor, 3rd Floor, Air India Bldg., Dr. Annie Besant Road, Nariman Point, Worli, Mumbai – 400 018 Mumbai - 400021 PAN: AAACG4936C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 1991-92 M/s. Growmore Research DCIT, & Assets Management Cent. Cir.-4(3), Ltd., Central Range-4, 32, Madhuli Apartment, Room No.1921, 3rd Flo…

Shri. S K Ramprasad, Bengaluru vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals)5, Bengaluru

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2008-09 is allowed as indicated above

ITA 2929/BANG/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2008-09 Shri. S. K. Ramprasad, Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax No.83, Ramson Building, (Appeals-5), 7Th Floor, Bmtc Building, 80 Silver Jubilee Park Road, Bangalore-560 002. Feet Road, Koramangala, Pan : Aanpr 1165 L Bangalore -560 095. Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. V. Chandrasekhar, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. M. Rajasekhar, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing : 14.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.05.2019

For Appellant: Shri. V. Chandrasekhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. M. Rajasekhar, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment year : 2008-09 Shri. S. K. Ramprasad, Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax No.83, Ramson Building, (Appeals-5), 7th Floor, BMTC Building, 80 Silver Jubilee Park Road, Bangalore-560 002. Feet Road, Koramangala, PAN : AANPR 1165 L Bangalore -560 095. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. V. Chandrasekhar, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. M. Rajasekhar, Addl. CIT Date of hearing : 14.03.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 24.05.2019 O R D E R Per Shri Jason P Boaz, A.M. :…