PCIT v. Super Malls Pvt. Ltd.
393 ITR 557High Court2017#654 most cited
What is PCIT v. Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. authority for?
A satisfaction note under section 153C is not invalid on hyper-technical grounds like literal interpretation of 'belonging to' if the Assessing Officer has satisfied himself with the contents of seized documents, even if those documents belong to a third party.
152
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.
Also referred to as
PCIT v. Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. · section 153C · satisfaction note · seized documents · third party · belonging to · hyper technical ground · invalid satisfaction note