PCIT v. SPML Infra Ltd.

164 Taxmann.com 505Supreme Court of India2024#16907 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. SPML Infra Ltd.

Satyapal Singh Chauhan HUF, Ambala Cantt vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 Ambala, Income Tax Office, Ambala

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 715/CHANDI/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Us:- "1. That The Ld. Pcit Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Exercising Revisionary Powers U./S 263. 2. That The Ld. Pcit Has Erred In Law & Facts In Holding That The Case Is Covered Under Clause (1) Of Explanation 2 Of Section 263(1). 3. That Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter, Amend Or To Substitute The Above Grounds Of Appeal Either Before Or At The Time Of Hearing Of Case." 2. The Facts, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Huf Have Been Filing The Returns Year After Year Disclosing Agricultural Income Besides Normal Rental Income. Agricultural Income Disclosed In The Previous Years & In The Year Under Consideration Is As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR (Virtual Mode)
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ न्यायपीठ “बी”, चण्डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: HYBRID MODE श्री राजपाल यादव, उपाध्यक्ष एवं श्री कृणवन्त सहाय, लेखा सदस्य BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV, VP & SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 715/Chd/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2020-21 Satyapal Singh Chauhan HUF C/o Rajiv Goel and Associates, 179 Bank Road, Ambala Cantt, Ambala Haryana-133001 बनाम The ITO Ward-4 Ambala स्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AAHHS7000M अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Seh…

Vaneet Gupta, S.O. Sh. Chattur Bhuj Gupta, #214, Sector-06, Panchkula vs. PCIT Panchkula Jurisdictional Assessing Officer ITO Ward 5, Panchkula

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 560/CHANDI/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Jan 2025AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 560/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vaneet Gupta, Vs. The Ito, बनाम S.O. Shri Chattur Bhuj Ward 5, Gupta, Panchkula # 214, Sector 6, Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aphpg0692N अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04.12.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20.01.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘B’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT & DR KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 560/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vaneet Gupta, Vs. The ITO, बनाम S.O. Shri Chattur Bhuj Ward 5, Gupta, Panchkula # 214, Sector 6, Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN No: APHPG0692N अपीलाथ"/ APPELLANT ""यथ"/ REPSONDENT ( Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 0…

PCIT v. SPML Infra Ltd. (164 Taxmann.com 505) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax