PCIT v. Shodiman Investments (P) Ltd.

93 Taxmann.com 153High Court2018#1425 most cited

What is PCIT v. Shodiman Investments (P) Ltd. authority for?

A reassessment notice issued under Section 148 is invalid if the Assessing Officer acts merely on intimation or 'borrowed satisfaction' from another authority without independently forming their own 'reason to believe' that income has escaped assessment.

80

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Shodiman Investments · Section 147 · Section 148 · reopening of assessment · borrowed satisfaction · reason to believe · AO's own satisfaction · validity of reassessment notice · income escaping assessment · Section 143(1) · Section 143(3)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Shodiman Investments (P) Ltd.

DCIT 13(1)(2), Mumbai vs. Pebble Bay Developers P.Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, is allowed for statistical purposes, whereas the application of the assessee under rule 27 is ...

ITA 5744/MUM/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale () Assessment Year: 2008-09 Dy. Commissioner Of Income- M/S Pebble Bay Developers Tax-13(1)(2), Pvt. Ltd., 2Nd Floor, Room No. 218, Vs. Raheja Chambers, Linking Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Road, Main Avenue Santacruz Mumbai-400020. (West), Mumbai-400054. Pan No. Aaccg 1645 E Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Ms. Vranda Matkari, Dr Assessee By : Mr. Nishit Gandhi, Ar Date Of Hearing : 26/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 21/10/2022

For Appellant: Mr. Nishit Gandhi, ARFor Respondent: Ms. Vranda Matkari, DR
Section 143(1)Section 148Section 69C

…assessment is under section 143 (1) or 143 (3) [Ref. PCIT W Shodiman assessment is under section 143 (1) or 143 (3) [Ref. PCIT W Shodiman assessment is under section 143 (1) or 143 (3) [Ref. PCIT W Shodiman Investments Pvt. Ltd. Investments Pvt. Ltd. - (2018) 93 Taxmann.com 153 (Bombay)l. As nn.com 153 (Bombay)l. As such it is respectfully submitted that even on this count the assessment such it is respectfully submitted that even on this count the assessment such it is respectfully submitted that even on this count the assessment deserves to be quashed.” deserves to be quashed.” 11.3 We find that the Ld. CIT(A)…

Deepak Trambaklal Mehta, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer 18(2) (4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 5036/MUM/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Dec 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Om Prakash Kant, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 5036/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2006-07) बिधम/ Deepak Trambaklal Mehta Ito-18(2)(4) 502, „B‟ Wing, 5Th Floor, Piramal Chamber, Parel Vs. Cadle Plaza, Kirti College (Lalbaug), Mumbai-400012. Lane, Prabhadevi, Dadar, Mumbai-400028. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpm9251C (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Nishit Gandhi Revenue By: Ms. Bhomika Patel सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 29/11/2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/12/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 31.05.2019 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -48, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2006- 07. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: - “On Natural Justice: 1.1 In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 48. Mumbai [The Cit(A)] Which In Turn Affirmed The Order Passed By A.Y.2006-07 The Learned Income Tax Officer - 18 (2)(4). Mumbai (The Ao) Is Had In Law & Deserves To Be Quashed Since The Assessment Order Passed By The Ao Is In Itself Void As The Same Is Passed In Gross Violation Of Principles Of Natural Justice.

For Appellant: Shri Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Ms. Bhomika Patel
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE OM PRAKASH KANT, AM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 5036/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2006-07) बिधम/ Deepak Trambaklal Mehta ITO-18(2)(4) 502, „B‟ Wing, 5th Floor, Piramal Chamber, Parel Vs. Cadle Plaza, Kirti College (Lalbaug), Mumbai-400012. Lane, Prabhadevi, Dadar, Mumbai-400028. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AABPM9251C (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Nishit Gandhi Revenue by: Ms. Bhomika Patel सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 29/11/2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pro…

M/S. Bansiwala Iron & Steel Rolling Mills, Jaipur vs. DCIT, Circle-3, Jaipur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1388/JPR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 1388/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :2008-09 Cuke M/S Bansiwala Iron & Steel Rolling Mills, D.C.I.T., 2Nd Floor, Somani Building, S.C. Link Vs. Circle-3, Road, Loha Mandi, Jaipur. Jaipur. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aadfb 2375 A Appellant Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By: Shri Mahendra Gargieya & Shri Dewang Gargieya (Advs) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By: Shri Rajendra Singh (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 06/09/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 15/09/2021 Vkns'K@ Order

For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya &For Respondent: Shri Rajendra Singh (CIT-DR)
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 69

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1388/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2008-09 cuke M/s Bansiwala Iron & Steel Rolling Mills, D.C.I.T., 2nd Floor, Somani Building, S.C. Link Vs. Circle-3, Road, Loha Mandi, Jaipur. Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AADFB 2375 A Appellant Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: Shri Mahendra Gargieya & Shri Dewang Gargieya…

DCIT 8(2)(1), Mumbai vs. Shradha Tradelinks P. Ltd, Mumbai

ITA 656/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Apr 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya () & Shri Ravish Sood () Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Shradha Tradelinks Income Tax-8(2)(1), Vs. Pvt. Ltd., 1108, Dalamal Aayakar Bhavan, Room Tower, Free Press No. 624, M.K. Road, Journal Marg, Mumbai – 400 020 Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan No. Aafcs1489R (Assessee) (Revenue) C.O No.323/Mum/2017 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 656/Mum/2016) (Assessment Year: 2008-09) M/S Shradha Tradelinks Deputy Commissioner Of Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax, Circle 7(2), 1108, Dalamal Tower, Aayakar Bhavan, Free Press Journal Marg, Mumbai – 400 020 Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan No. Aafcs1489R (Assessee) (Revenue) Assessee By : Shri Paresh Shaparia, A.R Revenue By : Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, Cit D.R Date Of Hearing : 13/01/2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 08/04/2021

For Appellant: Shri Paresh Shaparia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, CIT D.R
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147

…ITA No. 656/Mum/2016 AND C.O No. 323/Mum/2017 1 (Arising out of ITA No.656/Mum/2016) A.Y. 2008-09 DCIT Vs. M/s Shradha Tradelinks Pvt. Ltd. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “E” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Deputy Commissioner of M/s Shradha Tradelinks Income Tax-8(2)(1), Vs. Pvt. Ltd., 1108, Dalamal Aayakar Bhavan, Room Tower, Free Press No. 624, M.K. Road, Journal Marg, Mumbai – 400 020 Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 PAN No. AAFCS1489R (Assessee) (Revenue) C.O No.323/MUM/2017 (Arising out of ITA No. 656/Mum/2016) (Assessment…

Shri Manoj Kanhaiyalal Agarwal, Mumbai vs. ACIT Circle-17(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 5993/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Mar 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 5993/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Manoj Kanhaiyalal Agarwal बिधम/ Acit, Circle-17(2) 100-104, D. G. Chambers, Room No.123A, Aayakar Vs. 2Nd Floor, Nanik Motwani Bhavan, Mumbai-400020. Marg, Fort, Mumbai- 400023. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpa3100A (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri K. Shivaram (Ar) Revenue By: Shri Bharat Andhale (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 07/01/2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 01/03/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 18.07.2018 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-28, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y. 2010-11. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: - “1. Reopening Is Bad In Law 1. The Learned Cit(A) Failed To Appreciate That The Notice U/S.148 Dtd.31/03/2016 Was Issued On The Basis Of Information Received From Investigation Wing, Ahmedabad, Thus There Was No Independent Application Of Mind By The A.O. It Is Simply Based On Borrowed Satisfaction Of Some

For Appellant: Shri K. Shivaram (AR)For Respondent: Shri Bharat Andhale (DR)
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 5993/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Manoj Kanhaiyalal Agarwal बिधम/ ACIT, Circle-17(2) 100-104, D. G. Chambers, Room No.123A, Aayakar Vs. 2nd Floor, Nanik Motwani Bhavan, Mumbai-400020. Marg, Fort, Mumbai- 400023. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AABPA3100A (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee by: Shri K. Shivaram (AR) Revenue by: Shri Bharat Andhale (DR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 07/01/2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pron…