PCIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd.

250 Taxmann 16Supreme Court of India2017#1865 most cited

What is PCIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd. authority for?

Amounts claimed on account of employees' contributions to Provident Fund (PF) and Employees' State Insurance (ESI), if deposited on or before the due date for filing the income-tax return, cannot be disallowed under Section 43B or Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act.

61

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2024.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd · 250 Taxmann 16 · section 36(1)(va) · section 43B · section 2(24)(x) · employees contribution to PF · ESI · due date of return · disallowance · provident fund · employee share

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd.

DCIT Corporate Circle 1, Coimbatore vs. Indo Shell Automotive Systems India Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore

In the result, appeal filed by revenue is dismissed

ITA 1882/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1882/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs M/S. Indo Shell Automative Corporate Circle-1, Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Coimbatore. A-9, Sidco Industrial Estate, Kurichi,Coimbatore-641 021. Pan: Aabci 3140D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. Arjunraj, C.A for ""
Section 143(3)Section 2(22)Section 2(22)(e)Section 36(1)(va)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘ए’ "याय पीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी. दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी. मंजुनाथ , लेखा सद"य के सम% BEFORE SHRI V.DURGA RAO , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G.MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1882/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Vs M/s. Indo Shell Automative Corporate Circle-1, Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Coimbatore. A-9, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Kurichi,Coimbatore-641 021. PAN: AABCI 3140D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Mr. D.Manoj Kumar,CIT अपीलाथ" क" ओरसे/ Appellant by :…

Shri B. Purushothaman, Chennai vs. DCIT, Ncc-10(1), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 200/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 200/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri B. Purushothaman, The Deputy Commissioner Of No. 12, Redhills Road, Kolathur, Vs. Income Tax, Chennai 600 099. Non Corporate Circle 10(1), Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Ahipp9984F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 12.08.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.08.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 12, Chennai Dated 28.11.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The First Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Assessee Relates To Confirmation Of Disallowance Of Employee’S Contribution Amount To ₹.21,77,123/- Towards Epf.

For Appellant: Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’सी’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी धु"ु" आर.एल रे"ी, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी जी. मऺजुनाथा, लेखा सद" के सम" Before Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Judicial Member & Shri G. Manjunatha, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 200/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri B. Purushothaman, The Deputy Commissioner of No. 12, Redhills Road, Kolathur, Vs. Income Tax, Chennai 600 099. Non Corporate Circle 10(1), Chennai 600 034. [PAN:AHIPP9984F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""थ" की ओ…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Jaipur vs. M/S Ksheer Sagar Developers Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur

In the result, all these five appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1162/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Aug 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita Nos. 1158 To 1162/Jp/2019 Assessment Years: 2011-12 To 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of Cuke M/S Ksheer Sagar Developers Vs. Income Tax, Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-2, Hotel Royal Orchid, Opp.- Bsnl Jaipur. Office, Near Durgapura Flyover, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302018. Pan No.: Aacck 3154 G Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Rajendra Singh (Cit-Dr) Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By: Shri S.R. Sharma, (Ca) & Shri Rajnikant Bhatra (Ca) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 06/07/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 31/08/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Two Separate Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-4, Jaipur All Dated 31/07/2019 For The A.Y. 2011- 12 To 2015-16 Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma, (CA) &For Respondent: Shri Rajendra Singh (CIT-DR) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 35ASection 43BSection 69C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos. 1158 to 1162/JP/2019 Assessment Years: 2011-12 to 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner of cuke M/s Ksheer Sagar Developers Vs. Income Tax, Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-2, Hotel Royal Orchid, Opp.- BSNL Jaipur. Office, Near Durgapura Flyover, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302018. PAN No.: AACCK 3154 G vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Shri Ra…