PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd.

442 ITR 141High Court2022#434 most cited

What is PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. authority for?

Interest income earned by a co-operative society from deposits with other co-operative banks, such as district or state co-operative banks, is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, as it is considered income from other sources.

208

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. · Section 80P(2)(d) · cooperative society deduction · interest income cooperative bank · deposits with cooperative bank · deduction for cooperative societies · Totagars Cooperative Societies Ltd. · Section 80P · eligible for deduction

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd.

Mazhuvannoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd No. E21, Mazhuvannoor vs. ITO, Non Corporate Ward-1(1), Ernakulam

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 113/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Nov 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhasst.Year 2020-21 Mazhuvannoor Service Cooperative Ito, Bank Ltd. No.E21, V. Non Corporate 635, Mazhuvannoor, Ward-1(1), South Mazhuvannoor P.O., Ernakulam Ernakulam- 686669 Kerala Pan : Aabam 9326M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : None Respondent By : Smt.V.Swarnalatha, Sr.Dr Date Of Pronouncement : 06.11.2024 Date Of Hearing : 14.08.2024 O R D E R Per Bench : This Assessee’S Appeal Ita No.113/Coch/2024 For Assessment Year 2020-21 Arises Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) / Nfac Vide Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1058876986(1) Dated 19.12.2023, In Proceedings U/S.250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961; In Short “The Act” Hereinafter. Case Called Twice. None Appears At Assessee’S Behest. It Is Accordingly Proceed Exparte.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt.V.Swarnalatha, Sr.DR
Section 14ASection 250Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member & Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member Asst.Year 2020-21 Mazhuvannoor Service Cooperative ITO, Bank Ltd. No.E21, v. Non Corporate 635, Mazhuvannoor, Ward-1(1), South Mazhuvannoor P.O., Ernakulam Ernakulam- 686669 Kerala PAN : AABAM 9326M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by : Smt.V.Swarnalatha, Sr.DR Date of Pronouncement : 06.11.2024 Date of Hearing : 14.08.2024 O R D E R Per Bench : This assessee’s appeal ITA No.113/Coch/2024 for assessment year 2020-21 arises out of the order of…

The ITO, Trivandrum vs. Mudavanmukal Service Co-P Bank Ltd, Trivandrum

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 470/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year - 2012-2013 Mudavanmukal Service Co- Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Operative Bank Ltd. Poojappura, Mudavanmukal Ward 2(1), Trivandrum – 695 012. Thiruvananthapuram. Pan Aaaam4578Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue By : Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr Dr Assessee By : Sri Adithya Unnikrishnan, Ca Date Of Hearing : 13.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 05.11. 2024 Order Per Bench : This Revenue’S Appeal Ita.No.470/Coch/2023, For Assessment Year 2012-2013 Arises Out Of The Order Of The Learned Cit(A)-Nfac Vide Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/ 250/2023-24/1052557181(1) Dated 03.05.2023 In Proceedings U/S.144 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961; In Short “The Act” Hereinafter.

For Appellant: Sri Adithya Unnikrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, SR DR
Section 144Section 250(6)Section 68Section 80P(2)

…sources as per [2010] 322 ITR 283 (SC) Totgars Cooperative Sale Society Ltd., vs. ITO. We find no substance in the Revenue’s instant former grievance as hon’ble jurisdictional high court’s latest decisionin PCIT vs. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank [2022] 442 ITR 141 (Kerala) has already settled the issue in assessee’s favour and against the department. The former substantive ground fails in very terms. 3. Learned DR next submits that the Assessing Officer had rightly made sec.68 unexplained cash credit addition of Rs.2,63,98,320/- in assessee’s hands representing difference in closing and opening balances o…

Kannur District Ex Serviceman Multipurpose Co-Op Society, Kannur vs. The ITO Ward 1 & Tps, Kannur

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

ITA 432/COCH/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year - 2016-2017 Kannur District Ex-Servicemen Multipurpose V. The Income Tax Officer Co-Operative Society Limited, Ward 1 & Tps Payangadi Rs Kannur. Kannur 670 303. Pan : Aaaak8922A. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri George Thomas, C.A. Respondent By : Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. Dr Date Of Date Of Hearing : 13.08.2024 Pronouncement : 05.11.2024 Order Per Bench : This Assessee’S Appeal, Ita.No.432/Coch/2023, For Assessment Year 2016-2017, Arises Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) / Nfac Vide Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022-23/1051675600(1) Dated 30.03.2023, In Proceedings U/S.143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961; In Short “The Act” Hereinafter.

For Appellant: Shri George Thomas, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 22Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

…far as the assessee’s claim qua its impugned income derived from a co-operative bank is concerned, we indeed have the benefit of the benefit of the hon'ble jurisdictional high court’s detailed judgment in Pr. CIT vs. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. [2022] 442 ITR 141 (Ker) having rejected the Revenue’s identical arguments. That being the case we accept the assessee’s impugned section 80P deduction claim in principle and leave it open for the learned Assessing Officer to verify all necessary facts in the foregoing terms as per law. 6. This appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above te…