PCIT v. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt. Ltd.

84 Taxmann.com 58High Court2017#1308 most cited

What is PCIT v. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt. Ltd. authority for?

In reassessment proceedings initiated on the ground that companies providing share capital were non-existent, if the assessee provides documentary evidence of their existence, the burden shifts to the revenue to establish reasons for reassessment.

87

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt. Ltd. · Section 68 addition · unexplained cash credit · share application money · reassessment Section 147 · reassessment Section 148 · burden of proof · genuineness of transaction · creditworthiness of creditor · documentary evidence · share capital and share premium · Section 133(6) enquiries

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt. Ltd.

D.C.I.T., Central Circle - 1(4), Kolkata vs. M/S. Wise Investment Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 163/KOL/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Nov 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 163/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 D.C.I.T. Central Circle – 1(4), Kolkata M/S. Wise Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs 3Rd Floor 5, Govind Chand Dhar Lane Kolkata - 700001 [Pan: Aaacw3141R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Manish Tiwari, Fca Revenue By : Shri Abhijit Kundu, Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26/09/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 09/11/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Above Captioned Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals -21, Kolkata, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 26/12/2022, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Ld. Cit (A) Is Justified In Deleting Addition Made U/S. 68 Of Rs.32,50,00,000/- Ignoring The Remand Report Dated 20.07.2022 Wherein The Report Categorically Stated That The Share Applicant Company Has No Creditworthiness To Invest In The Assesses Company. 2. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Ld. Cit (A) Was Erroneous As It Had Not Taken Cognizance Of The Fact That The 2

For Appellant: Shri Manish Tiwari, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT D/R
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 68

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, कोलकाता | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 163/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 D.C.I.T. Central Circle – 1(4), Kolkata M/s. Wise Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs 3rd Floor 5, Govind Chand Dhar Lane Kolkata - 700001 [PAN: AAACW3141R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA Revenue by : Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 26/09/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 09/11/2023 आदेश/O R D E R…

Sms Machines Pvt. Ltd, Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-2(4), Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 16/KOL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 16/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sms Machines Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2(4), 9, Ganesh Chandra Avenue Vs Kolkata Fiddley Chambers Suit No. 6 3Rd Floor Kolkata - 700013 [Pan : Aalcs8132R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwala, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24/07/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/10/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Above Captioned Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 1, Kolkata, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 27/08/2018, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. That In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Passing Ex-Parte Order Without Providing Any Opportunity To The Appellant. As Such, The Order Of The Ld. Cit (A) Is Liable To Be Set Aside. 2. That In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Assessing Officer Has Erred In Making Additions Of Rs. 1,86,58,000/- As Unexplained Cash Credit Under Section 68 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Ld. Cit (A) Has Erred In Confirming The Action Of A.O. & Passing Ex-Parte Order Without Allowing Proper Opportunity Of Being Heard To The Appellant.

For Appellant: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwala, CIT, D/R
Section 131Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 68

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, कोलकाता | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY GARG, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 16/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2012-13 SMS Machines Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2(4), 9, Ganesh Chandra Avenue Vs Kolkata Fiddley Chambers Suit No. 6 3rd Floor Kolkata - 700013 [PAN : AALCS8132R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwala, CIT, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 24/07/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Prono…

ITO, Ward-8(1), Kolkata vs. M/S Maninya Comfin Pvt Ltd, Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 79/KOL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 79/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), M/S. Maninya Comfin Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata Vs 9, Lal Bazar Street Lal Bazar Kolkata - 700001 [Pan : Aadcm5088N] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vinod Kr. Jain, A/R Revenue By : Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13/07/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03/08/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Cit(A)”], Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’), Dated 26/09/2018 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Made U/S. 68 Of Rs. 7,96,16,343/- On Account Of Unexplained Cash Credit In The Form Of Share Capital With Premium. 2. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(A)-4, Kol., Is Erred In Deleting The Addition Without Considering The Facts That The Source Of Fresh Share Capital Amount Was Not Properly Explained By The Assessee During The Course Of Assessment Proceedings & The Director Of The Assessee Company Did Not Appear Against Summon U/S. 131 To Substantiate The Claim Of The Assessee With Documentary Evidences. 3. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(A), Failed To Appreciate That When The Sums Are Credited In The Books Of Accounts

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kr. Jain, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. CIT, D/R
Section 131Section 143(2)Section 250Section 68

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, कोलकाता | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 79/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), M/s. Maninya Comfin Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata Vs 9, Lal Bazar Street Lal Bazar Kolkata - 700001 [PAN : AADCM5088N] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Vinod Kr. Jain, A/R Revenue by : Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. CIT, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 13/07/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 03/08/2023 आदेश/O R D E R P…

Subhdhan Financial Advisory Private Limited, Kolkata vs. I.T.O., Ward-9(4), Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2198/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 2198/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Subhdhan Financial Advisory Income Tax Officer, Ward-9(4) Private Limited Vs C/O Sri Jitendra Kaushik, Advocate 19D, Muktaram Babu Street Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aamcs7818P] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sunil Surana, Fca Revenue By : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/05/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 11/07/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 15, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)”], Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’), Dated 13/03/2019 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. For That The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax(A) 15, Kolkata Is Arbitrary, Illegal & Bad In Law. 2. For That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) 15, Erred In Confirming The Action Of Income-Tax Officer Adding A Sum Of Rs.72,00,000/- Under Section 68 Of The I T Act 1961. 3. For That The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter Or Amend Any Ground Before Or At The Time Of Hearing Of Appeal.”

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT D/R
Section 143(2)Section 250Section 68

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, कोलकाता | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 2198/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Subhdhan Financial Advisory Income Tax Officer, Ward-9(4) Private Limited Vs C/o Sri Jitendra Kaushik, Advocate 19D, Muktaram Babu Street Kolkata - 700007 [PAN : AAMCS7818P] अपीलाथ"/ (Assessee ) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Sunil Surana, FCA Revenue by : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 16/05/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronoun…

Hastings Tower Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. I.T.O., Ward - 8(4), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 730/KOL/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Apr 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12 Hastings Tower Private Limited Ito, Ward-8(4), Kolkata P-3, New C.I.T. Road, Kolkata- Vs. 700073. Pan: Aabch 5595 D (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, Ar Respondent By : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.04.2023 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Vide Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022-23/1046315143(1) Dated 14.10.2022 Against The Assessment Order Passed U/S 143(3) Read With Sections 147 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’).

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH “SMC”, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Hastings Tower Private Limited ITO, Ward-8(4), Kolkata P-3, New C.I.T. Road, Kolkata- Vs. 700073. PAN: AABCH 5595 D (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri Miraj D. Shah, AR Respondent by : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 27.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 21.04.2023 O R D E R PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of CIT(A), National Faceless…

ITO, Ward - 5(1), Kolkata vs. M/S. Subhavani Projects Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2609/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A No.2609/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ito, Ward-5(1), Kolkata......................................………...…..…Appellant Vs. M/S Subhavani Projects Pvt. Ltd.............................…....…..…..Respondent Baid Mansion, 10Th Floor, Room No.1515, 4, Synagogue Street, Kol-1. [Pan: Aarcs1202Q] Appearances By: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Rajeeva Kumar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 16, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 05, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 17.08.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant, During The Year, Raised Share Capital Of Share Capital Of Rs.7,78,000/- Along With The Share Premium Of Rs. 3,32,22,000/- (Rs.3,40,00,000/- In Aggregate) From The 6 Share Applicants By Issuing 67,800 Number Of Shares Having Face Value Of Rs.10/- On Premium Of Rs.490/-. A Sum Of Rs.1,00,000/- Was Invested By The Promoters Of The Assessee Company. In The Course Of The Assessment Proceedings, The Assessing Officer Made Requisite

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ ‘बी’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मनीष बोरड, लेखा सद"य के सम" Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member I.T.A No.2609/Kol/2018 Assessment year: 2012-13 ITO, Ward-5(1), Kolkata......................................………...…..…Appellant vs. M/s Subhavani Projects Pvt. Ltd.............................…....…..…..Respondent Baid Mansion, 10th Floor, Room No.1515, 4, Synagogue Street, Kol-1. [PAN: AARCS1202Q] Appearances by: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the…

ITO, Ward - 5(4), Kolkata vs. Forceful Estates Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2558/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No.2558/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ito, Ward-5(4), Kolkata...................……….........…..........….…… Appellant Vs. Forceful Estates Pvt. Ltd.........….....……........….....…...…..…..... Respondent 11, Clive Row, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata-1. [Pan: Aabcf7913M] Appearances By: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Rajeeva Kumar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 09, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 3, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 21.08.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Revenue In This Appeal Is Aggrieved By The Action Of The Cit(A) In Deleting The Additions Made By The Assessing Officer In Respect Of Receipt Of Rs.7,60,00,000/- By The Assessee Company Which Was Treated By The Assessing Officer As Unexplained Income Of The Assessee U/S 68 Of The Act On The Ground That The Assessee Had Failed To Establish The Identity, Genuineness & Creditworthiness Of The Share Subscribers.

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ ‘सी’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी "गर"श अ"वाल, लेखा सद"य के सम" Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.2558/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 ITO, Ward-5(4), Kolkata...................……….........…..........….…… Appellant vs. Forceful Estates Pvt. Ltd.........….....……........….....…...…..…..... Respondent 11, Clive Row, 3rd Floor, Kolkata-1. [PAN: AABCF7913M] Appearances by: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Rajeeva Kumar,…

DCIT, C.C.-3(4), Kolkata vs. M/S Tanishque Trade Link Pvt. Ltd, Howrah

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 17/KOL/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Mar 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 17/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2008-09 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tanishque Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. Tax, Central Circle-3(4), Kolkata Vs Bhabatarini Apartment G.T. Road, Room No. 602 Howrah - 711201 [Pan : Aacct7512R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri A.K. Tibrewal, Fca Revenue By : Shri Biswanath Das, Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18/01/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/03/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Kolkata (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dated 24/09/2020, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’), For Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. That On Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law As Well As In Facts In Allowing The Bogus Share Capital Raised In The Books Of The Assessee Without Appreciating The Fact That The Assessee Failed To Discharge Its Primary Onus To Prove & Establish The Identity & Creditworthiness Of The Investor Companies & Genuineness Of The Transaction. 2. That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law As Well As In Facts In Ignoring That The Identity & Creditworthiness Of The Shareholders & Even The Genuineness Of The Transactions Remained Unexplained. 3. That On Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Invoking His Powers U/S. 250(4) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 In Directing The Assessing Officer To Make Further Enquiry & Report The Results Of The

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tibrewal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das, CIT D/R
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 250Section 250(4)Section 263Section 68

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, कोलकाता | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 17/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2008-09 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tanishque Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. Tax, Central Circle-3(4), Kolkata Vs Bhabatarini Apartment G.T. Road, Room No. 602 Howrah - 711201 [PAN : AACCT7512R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri A.K. Tibrewal, FCA Revenue by : Shri Biswanath Das, CIT D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18/01/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronounce…