PCIT v. Oxygen Business Park (P)Ltd.

157 Taxmann.com 175High Court2023#4977 most cited

What is PCIT v. Oxygen Business Park (P)Ltd. authority for?

Fresh material or information received after a search and seizure, without any assessment pending or incriminating material found during the search, is insufficient to reopen assessment under Section 153A.

23

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Oxygen Business Park (P)Ltd. · section 153A · search and seizure · incriminating material · post-search investigation · reopening assessment · assessment pending

Sections most often in play

Section 10(38)Section 147Section 153ASection 153CSection 69CSection 148Section 132Section 143(3)

Issues it is cited on

section 153cofsection 127(2)(a)section 153aofsection 124(3)(a)warrant of authorisationsection 127(2)section 158bb(1)sanction under section 151section 142(3)section 124(3)section 158bbbogus ltcg

Judgments citing PCIT v. Oxygen Business Park (P)Ltd.

Rupal Kashyap Mehta, Mumbai vs. DCIT, CC-4(1), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6191/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 10(38)Section 127(2)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 153D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘D’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6191/Mum/2024 to 6196/Mum/2024 (Assessment Year :2012-13 & 2014-15 to 2018-19) Mrs. Rupal Kashyap Mehta Vs. DCIT CC 4(1) 26/27, A Wing Mumbai Ahuja Towers Rajabhau Desai Road Prabhadevi Mumbai – 400 025 PAN/GIR No.AGRPM5338E (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal (Hybrid) / Shri Satish Kumar Gupta Revenue by Smt. Sanyogita Nagpal, CIT DR Date of Hearing 20/02/2025 Date of Pronouncement 27/02/2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: The aforesaid ap…

Shashi Agarwal, Lucknow vs. DCIT-1, Lucknow

In the result, these two appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 199/LKW/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 68Section 69Section 69C

…I.T.A. No.198 & 199/Lkw/2023 Assessment Year:2015-16 & 16-17 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.198 & 199/Lkw/2023 Assessment Year:2015-16 & 16-17 Smt. Shashi Agarwal, Vs. Dy.C.I.T., 5th Floor, Tuba Palace, Central Circle-1, 15, Madan Mohan Malviya Marg, Lucknow. Lucknow. PAN:ACUPA3714B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Akshay Agrawal, Advocate Respondent by Shri Manu Chaurasia, CIT (D.R.) O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) These two appeals have been fil…

Shashi Agarwal, Lucknow vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1, Lucknow

In the result, these two appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 198/LKW/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 68Section 69Section 69C

…I.T.A. No.198 & 199/Lkw/2023 Assessment Year:2015-16 & 16-17 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.198 & 199/Lkw/2023 Assessment Year:2015-16 & 16-17 Smt. Shashi Agarwal, Vs. Dy.C.I.T., 5th Floor, Tuba Palace, Central Circle-1, 15, Madan Mohan Malviya Marg, Lucknow. Lucknow. PAN:ACUPA3714B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Akshay Agrawal, Advocate Respondent by Shri Manu Chaurasia, CIT (D.R.) O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) These two appeals have been fil…