PCIT v. Leroy Somer & Control (India) P. Ltd.

110 ITD 616Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2008#21991 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,615 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2022.

Judgments citing PCIT v. Leroy Somer & Control (India) P. Ltd.

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Mmtc Limited, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 3378/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena A. Pillai, Jm Ita No. 3378/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S Mmtc Ltd., Tax, Circle-5(1), Core 1, Scope Complex, 7 New Delhi-110002 Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm1433E Assessee By : Sh. Rohit Jain, Adv. & Ms. Deepashree Rao, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 24.05.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Department Against The Order Dated 14.03.2014 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Viii, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 271GSection 92CSection 92D(1)Section 92E

…to (m) of Rule 10D of the Income Tax Rules. The said notice is, therefore, held to be bad in law and cannot be treated as proper and legal in terms of Section 92D (3) of the Act relying upon Para 32 of the order of IT AT in the case of Cargill India Pvt. Ltd. 110 ITD 616 Delhi. 8.2 The contention of the Appellant that it had reasonable cause with respect to delayed submission of information/documents read with Section 92D of the Act, it is held that since the staff of the Appellant was busy in preparation for various appeals listed before ITAT as well as conference with the advocates with regards to such preparat…

PCIT v. Leroy Somer & Control (India) P. Ltd. (110 ITD 616) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax