PCIT v. Gunja Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd.

147 Taxmann.com 518High Court2013#958 most cited

What is PCIT v. Gunja Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd. authority for?

Interest income earned by a cooperative credit society from its funds parked with nationalized and commercial banks is construed as profits and gains of business, eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).

111

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v Gunja Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd · 147 Taxmann.com 518 · section 80P(2)(a)(i) · interest income · cooperative credit society · business income · deduction

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Gunja Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd.

Pune Jilha Gramsevak Sahkari Pathsanstha Maryadit Pune, Pune vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-12(1), Pune

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 958/PUN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.958/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Pune Jilha Gramsevak Vs. Ito, Ward-12(1), Pune. Sahkari Pathsanstha Maryadit, 752, Shivlila Chembers, Kumthekar Road, Sadashiv Peth, Pune- 411030. Pan : Aabap0214D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Deepa Khare Revenue By : Shri Kalpesh Rupavatiya Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 05.10.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 13.06.2023 For The Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Society Incorporated Under The Provisions Of The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act. It Is A Member Of Co- Operative Society Formed For The Purpose Of Providing Credit

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Kalpesh Rupavatiya
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.958/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Pune Jilha Gramsevak Vs. ITO, Ward-12(1), Pune. Sahkari Pathsanstha Maryadit, 752, Shivlila Chembers, Kumthekar Road, Sadashiv Peth, Pune- 411030. PAN : AABAP0214D Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Smt. Deepa Khare Revenue by : Shri Kalpesh Rupavatiya Date of hearing : 27.09.2023 Date of pronouncement : 05.10.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the Nationa…

Shri Vardhaman Urban Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamit, Kudchi vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1, Belagavi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 91/PAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji08 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.91/Pan/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Vardhaman Urban Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Belgaum. Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamit, Post- Kudchi, Tal- Raibag, Dist.- Belgaum, Karnataka- 591005. Pan : Aaaas5599R Appellant Respondent S.A. No.07/Pan/2023 (Arising Out Of Ita No.91/Pan/2023) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Vardhaman Urban Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Belgaum. Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamit, Post- Kudchi, Tal- Raibag, Dist.- Belgaum, Karnataka- 591005. Pan : Aaaas5599R Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri U. G. Ammangi Revenue By : Shri Ashwini D. Hosmani Date Of Hearing : 04.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.09.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated

For Appellant: Shri U. G. AmmangiFor Respondent: Shri Ashwini D. Hosmani
Section 143(3)Section 21Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI – VIRTUAL COURT BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.91/PAN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Vardhaman Urban Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Belgaum. Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamit, Post- Kudchi, Tal- Raibag, Dist.- Belgaum, Karnataka- 591005. PAN : AAAAS5599R Appellant Respondent S.A. No.07/PAN/2023 (Arising out of ITA No.91/PAN/2023) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Vardhaman Urban Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Belgaum. Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamit, Post- Kudchi…

Yeshwantrao Chavan Gbs, Pune vs. Income Tax Officer, Wrd-10(5), Pune

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 698/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.698/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Yeshwantrao Chavan Gbs, Vs. Ito, Ward-10(5), Pune. Near Post Office Belhe, At & Post Belhe, Pune, Tal. Junnar- 412410. Pan : Aaaaa0697A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Pramod S. Shingte Revenue By : Shri Rajesh Gawali Date Of Hearing : 20.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 01.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Cooperative Society Registered Under The Provisions Of Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. It Is Engaged In The Business Of Accepting Deposits From Its Members & Providing Credit Facilities

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Gawali
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.698/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Yeshwantrao Chavan GBS, Vs. ITO, Ward-10(5), Pune. Near Post Office Belhe, At and Post Belhe, Pune, Tal. Junnar- 412410. PAN : AAAAA0697A Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Pramod S. Shingte Revenue by : Shri Rajesh Gawali Date of hearing : 20.06.2023 Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre,…

Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Satara vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Satara

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 569/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.569/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Satara. Patsanstha Ltd., 67, Guruwar Peth, At Post Karad, Dist.- Satara- 415110. Pan : Aaaaj1374R Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 26.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 29.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.569/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Satara. Patsanstha Ltd., 67, Guruwar Peth, At Post Karad, Dist.- Satara- 415110. PAN : AAAAJ1374R Appellant Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date of hearing : 26.05.2023 Date of pronouncement : 29.05.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, De…

Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Nandurbar vs. Invcome Tax Officer Ward-1, Dhule

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 552/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Pune26 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.552/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 Pan : Aaaak5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 25.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 24.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Was Filed On 08.09.2018 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs.Nil After Claiming Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Of Rs.78,15,971/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 15.02.2021 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 143(3A) & 143(3B) Of The Act At A Total Income Of Rs.42,09,784/-. While Doing So, The Assessing Officer Denied The Exemption U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) In Respect Of Interest Income On Deposits Made Out Of The Surplus Funds In Cooperative Banks & Scheduled Banks On The Ground That The Said Income Does Not Qualify For Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Or 80P(2)(D) Of The Act. 3. Being Aggrieved, An Appeal Was Filed Before The Nfac, Who Vide Impugned Order Confirmed The Addition Made By The Assessing Officer. 4. Being Aggrieved, The Appellant Is In Appeal Before This Tribunal In The Present Appeal.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.552/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 PAN : AAAAK5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date of hearing : 25.05.2023 Date of pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee…

Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Nandurbar vs. Invcome Tax Officer Ward-1, Dhule

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 551/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Pune26 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.551/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 Pan : Aaaak5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 24.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 24.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Was Filed On 10.10.2017 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs.Nil After Claiming Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Of Rs.73,98,124/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 31.10.2019 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act At A Total Income Of Rs.44,57,088/-. While Doing So, The Assessing Officer Denied The Exemption U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) In Respect Of Interest Income On Deposits Made Out Of The Surplus Funds In Cooperative Banks & Scheduled Banks On The Ground That The Said Income Does Not Qualify For Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Or 80P(2)(D) Of The Act. 3. Being Aggrieved, An Appeal Was Filed Before The Nfac, Who Vide Impugned Order Confirmed The Addition Made By The Assessing Officer. 4. Being Aggrieved, The Appellant Is In Appeal Before This Tribunal In The Present Appeal.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.551/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 PAN : AAAAK5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date of hearing : 24.05.2023 Date of pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee…