What is PCIT v. Anand Kumar Jain authority for?

A statement recorded under Section 132(4) from a third party, lacking corroborative evidence, does not constitute sufficient incriminating material to assume jurisdiction or make additions in an assessment under Section 153A or 153C.

How many judgments cite PCIT v. Anand Kumar Jain?

180 judgments on BharatTax cite PCIT v. Anand Kumar Jain (432 ITR 384), spanning 2021 to 2026.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does PCIT v. Anand Kumar Jain come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 143(3), Section 153A, Section 153C, Section 132(4), Section 132, Section 68.

PCIT v. Anand Kumar Jain (432 ITR 384)

DCIT, Central Circle- 4(1), Mumbai vs. Evergreen Financial Services, Mumbai

In the result, the cross objection by the assessee is allowed, while the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1625/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiyashri Sandeep Singh Karhailassessment Year : 2013-14 Dcit, Central Circle-4(1), Room No. 1916, 19Th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ……………. Appellant V/S Evergreen Financial Services, Kanakia Future City, Cts 101, Behind Dr. L H Hiranandani Hospital, Mumbai-400093. ……………. Respondent Pan : Aabfe 9028 R

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 153DSection 250Section 37Section 68

…Court in Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd. (supra). 19. We find that similar findings were rendered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in PCIT v/s Pilot Industries Ltd., reported in (2023) 457 ITR 437 (Del.), and in PCIT v/s Anant Kumar Jain (HUF), reported in (2021) 432 ITR 384 (Del.). 20. Since, in the present case, it is undisputed that the assessment year under consideration is an unabated/concluded year, therefore, we find no basis in upholding the additions made by the AO under section 68 and disallowance made under section 37(1) of the Act in the absence of incriminating evidence found during the search. Accordin…

Mr. D K Shivakumar, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle- 1(4), Bangalore

ITA 205/BANG/2022[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jan 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundarajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Chandrasekhar, ARFor Respondent: Shri. Y. V. Raviraj, Sr. Standing Counsel

Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "B" BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SOUNDARAJAN K, JUDICIAL MEMBER | ITA Nos. and Assessment Year | Appellant | Respondent 45, 46, 47, 48/Bang/2020 2007-08 to 2010-11 | DCIT, Central Circle – 1(4), Bengaluru. Shri. D. K. Shivakumar, No.252, “Kenkkeri” 18th Cross, Upper Palace Orchards, Sadashivanagar, Bengaluru – 560 080. PAN : AKKPS 1306 F 205/Bang/2022 2006-07 | Shri. D. K. Shivakumar, Bengaluru – 560 080. PAN : AKKPS 1306 F DCIT, Central Circle – 1(4), Bengaluru. Assessee by : Shri. Chandrasekhar, AR. Revenue by : Shri. Y. V. Ra…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle- 1(4), Bangalore vs. Mr. D K Shivakumar, Bangalore

ITA 45/BANG/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jan 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundarajan K

For Respondent: Shri. Chandrasekhar, AR

Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SOUNDARAJAN K, JUDICIAL MEMBER | ITA Nos. and Assessment Year | Appellant | Respondent 45, 46, 47, 48/Bang/2020 2007-08 to 2010-11 DCIT, Central Circle – 1(4), Bengaluru. Shri. D. K. Shivakumar, No.252, “Kenkkeri” 18th Cross, Upper Palace Orchards, Sadashivanagar, Bengaluru – 560 080. PAN : AKKPS 1306 F 205/Bang/2022 2006-07 Shri. D. K. Shivakumar, Bengaluru – 560 080. PAN : AKKPS 1306 F DCIT, Central Circle – 1(4), Bengaluru. Assessee by Revenue by : Shri. Chandrasekhar, AR. : Shri. Y. V. Ravir…

DCIT, Ghaziabad vs. M/S. Devidayal Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., Ghaziabad

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3850/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jan 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2018-19] M.B.Power (Madhya Pradesh) Vs Dcit, Ltd., 239, Okhla Industrial Central Circle-2, Estate, Nehru Place, Gurgaon Delhi -110019. Pan-Aafcm6698A Appellant Respondent

Section 132(4)Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250

…2017- 18. IV. Jurisdiction u/s 153C cannot be assumed on the basis of third -party statement Moreover, without corroborative evidence, jurisdiction u/s 153C cannot be assumed on the basis of statement of a third party. In CIT v. Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) (2021) 432 ITR 384 (Del), besides search on the assessee HUF, premises of one Pradeep Kumar Jindal were also searched. During search, statement of Pradeep Kumar was recorded u/s 132(4), wherein, he admitted to have provided accommodation entries to the assessee. Hon’ble High Court considering the question “whether a statement under Section 132(4) constitutes incrim…

Sourabh Agrotech Private Limited, Alwar vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Alwar

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 712/JPR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: MS Alka Gautam, CIT (Through

Section 143(3)Section 153A

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos. 711 & 712/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2012-13 cuke Saurabh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. DCIT, Vs. 20, 21 and 22, Old Industrial Central Circle, Alwar Area, Alwar LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AADCS 4522 P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal, CA jktLo dh…

Saurabh Agrotech Private Limited, Alwar vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Alwar

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 711/JPR/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Jan 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: MS Alka Gautam, CIT (Through

Section 143(3)Section 153A

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos. 711 & 712/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2012-13 cuke Saurabh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. DCIT, Vs. 20, 21 and 22, Old Industrial Central Circle, Alwar Area, Alwar LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AADCS 4522 P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal, CA jktLo dh…