PCIT, Central-3 v. Allied Perfumers (P.) Ltd.

124 Taxmann.com 358High Court2021#2150 most cited

What is PCIT, Central-3 v. Allied Perfumers (P.) Ltd. authority for?

The case is cited for various issues including the definition of capital assets, reassessment procedures under sections 153A and 153C, and the effect of clarificatory amendments.

54

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

PCIT v Allied Perfumers (P.) Ltd. · 124 Taxmann.com 358 · section 2(14)(iii)(a) · section 2(14)(iii)(b) · section 153(c) · section 96 · abatement of assessment · section 153(a) · section 2(47)(v) · section 2(14)(iii) · section 153(1) · clarificatory amendment · section 53 · section 153c(1)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT, Central-3 v. Allied Perfumers (P.) Ltd.

Smt. Sharada, Legal Heir of Late Shri. Muttegere Javaregowda Appaji., Shimoga vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1 (4)., Queens Road, Bengaluru

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2098/BANG/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Sept 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Year : 2020-21 Smt. Sharada, Vs. Dcit, Legal Heir Of Late Shri. Muttegere Central Circle – 1(4), Javaregowda Appaji, Bangalore. Jq 1, New Town, Bhardravathi, Shimoga, Bhadravathi H.O 577 301, Karnataka. Pan : Apkpa 7777 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Balram R Rao, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Subramanian S, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bangalore. Date Of Hearing : 19.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri. Balram R Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 132oSection 142(1)Section 153C

…o(s).21528 of 2024. [2024] 165 taxmann.com 846. Dt: 20.08.2024.  Saksham Commodities Ltd V/s. Income Tax Officer in W P No: 1459 of 2024. [2024] 161taxamnn.com 485. Dt: 09.04.2024.  Principal Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd. [2021] 431 ITR 237(Delhi). Dt: 14.12.2020. 8. On the other hand, learned DR relied on the Order of the lower authorities and he has filed written synopsis also supporting his arguments which is as under: Page 12 of 23 Page 13 of 23 Page 14 of 23 9. Considering the rival submissions and on perusal of the entire material available on record and Orders of authorities…

ACIT, Central Circle-2(1), Mumbai vs. M/S Rishabraj Infra Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3246/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B R Baskaran & Shir Pavan Kumar Gadaleita Nos. 3246/Mum/2022 (A.Y: 2015-16) Acit, C.Circle -2(1), Vs. Rishabraj Infrapvtltd., Old Cgo Bldg, 804, 212, 2Nd Floor, B Wing, 8Th Floor, M.K. Road, Bldg No. 3, Hari Om Mumbai – 400020. Plaza, Mg Road, Boravali (E), Mumbai-400066. Pan/Gir No. : Aadcv2975P Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Ms.Riddhi Mishra.Dr Revenue By : Mr.Karan Jain.Ar Date Of Hearing 18.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 24.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-48, Mumbai Passed U/Sec 250 Of The Act. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Ms.Riddhi Mishra.DRFor Respondent: Mr.Karan Jain.AR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B R BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHIR PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos. 3246/Mum/2022 (A.Y: 2015-16) ACIT, C.Circle -2(1), Vs. Rishabraj InfraPvtLtd., Old CGO Bldg, 804, 212, 2nd Floor, B Wing, 8th Floor, M.K. Road, Bldg No. 3, Hari Om Mumbai – 400020. Plaza, MG Road, Boravali (E), Mumbai-400066. PAN/GIR No. : AADCV2975P Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Ms.Riddhi Mishra.DR Revenue by : Mr.Karan Jain.AR Date of Hearing 18.04.2023 Date of Pronouncement 24.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The revenue has file…

PCIT, Central-3 v. Allied Perfumers (P.) Ltd. (124 Taxmann.com 358) — Cited in 54 Judgments | BharatTax