Palam Gas Service v. CIT

394 ITR 300Supreme Court of India2017#980 most cited

What is Palam Gas Service v. CIT authority for?

Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS is mandatory, applying even to amounts already paid and not merely 'payable', based on a purposive construction of the provision, irrespective of the timing of payment or liability.

110

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,735 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Palam Gas Service v. CIT · Section 40(a)(ia) · TDS non-deduction · mandatory disallowance · paid or payable · purposive construction · PAN verification · commission payment · Supreme Court · 394 ITR 300

Also reported as

81 Taxmann.com 43

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Palam Gas Service v. CIT

Kreative Hosts Atria Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 551/HYD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri A .Mohan Alankamony & Chandra Mohan Gargassessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Kreative Hosts Atria Pvt Vs. Dcit, Circle-2(1), Ltd., C/O. P. Murali & Co., C,A, Hyderabad 6-3-655/2/3, Simajiguda, Hyderabad Pan/Gir No.Aadck 2362 B (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.Murali Mohan Rao , Ar Revenue By : Shri T.Sunil Goutham (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 11/10/ 2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 06/01/2022 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-2, Hyderabad Dated 28.5.2018 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 .

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohan Rao , ARFor Respondent: Shri T.Sunil Goutham (DR)
Section 249(3)Section 40Section 5

…al No.10, the assessee is claiming that if the assessee has not been treated as an “assessee in default” u/s 201(1), no disallowance u/s 40a(ia) can be made 9. We find that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Palam Gas Service vs. CIT reported in (2017) 81 Taxmann.com 43 (S.C) has held that irrespective of the amount being paid, the same is disallowable u/s 40(a)(ia) if no TDS has been made. Therefore, the decision of the CIT (A) on this point has to be set aside. In such circumstances, the alternate plea of the assessee assumes importance. 10. The learned Counsel for the assessee has placed reliance upon t…

ACIT Corporate Circle 6(1), Chennai vs. M/S, Shriram City Union Finance Co. Ltd., Chennai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue

ITA 1298/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1251/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Mookambika Complex, Income Tax, No.4, Lady Desika Road, Mylapore, Corporate Circle-6(1) Chennai-600 004. Chennai-34. Pan: Aaacs 7703H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1298/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs Shriram City Union Finance Tax, Ltd. Corporate Circle-6(1) Mookambika Complex, Chennai-34. No.4, Lady Desika Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. Pan: Aaacs 7703H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.Abani Kanta Nayak, CIT &
Section 115JSection 45I

…on of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT Vs.Vector Shipping Services Pvt.Ltd.(supra). The fact remains that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has subsequently reversed decisions of various High Courts in the case of Palam Gas Servicevs.CIT (2017) 394 ITR 300, and held that provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, is applicable for non-deduction of TDS under respective made before end of relevant financial year. The learned CIT(A), after considering relevant facts has rightly sustained additions made by the Assessing Officer towards disallowance of commission of Rs.18,44,989/-. Therefore, we are…

Shriram City Union Finance Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT Corporate Circle 6(1), Chennai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue

ITA 1251/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1251/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Mookambika Complex, Income Tax, No.4, Lady Desika Road, Mylapore, Corporate Circle-6(1) Chennai-600 004. Chennai-34. Pan: Aaacs 7703H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1298/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs Shriram City Union Finance Tax, Ltd. Corporate Circle-6(1) Mookambika Complex, Chennai-34. No.4, Lady Desika Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. Pan: Aaacs 7703H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.Abani Kanta Nayak, CIT &
Section 115JSection 45I

…on of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT Vs.Vector Shipping Services Pvt.Ltd.(supra). The fact remains that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has subsequently reversed decisions of various High Courts in the case of Palam Gas Servicevs.CIT (2017) 394 ITR 300, and held that provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, is applicable for non-deduction of TDS under respective made before end of relevant financial year. The learned CIT(A), after considering relevant facts has rightly sustained additions made by the Assessing Officer towards disallowance of commission of Rs.18,44,989/-. Therefore, we are…