ORTH (P) LTD.' (2020) 275 TAXMAN 408 (KAR), 'CIT & ANR. v. AZTEC SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY LTD.

429 ITR 493High Court2020#20842 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 346,713 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2022.

Judgments citing ORTH (P) LTD.' (2020) 275 TAXMAN 408 (KAR), 'CIT & ANR. v. AZTEC SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY LTD.

M/S Fortune Metaliks Limited, Ludhiana vs. Pr.CIT(Central), Ludhiana

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 82/CHANDI/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Mar 2022AY 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR Khanna

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ ‘‘ए’, च"डीगढ़ च"डीगढ़ आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ च"डीगढ़ च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘A’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE: SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./ ITA No. 82/CHD/2021 आयकर आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / A.Y : 2016-17 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" M/s Fortune Metaliks Limited, The Pr.CIT (Central), बनाम Opp. Circuit House, Ferozepur Road, Ludhiana. VS Ludhiana. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN /TAN No: AABCF3202D अप…

Sh. Surinder Pal Singh, Ludhiana vs. Pr.CIT-1, Ludhiana

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 57/CHANDI/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh31 Jan 2022AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)

…eported in (2020) 423 ITR 180 (Cal) • CIT Vs. A.R. Builders & Developers P. Ltd. (2020) 425 ITR 272 (Mad.) • CIT Vs. Late Shri Vijay Kumar Koganti Through LR Smt. Brundavani Koganti (2020) 195 DTR (Mad) 428, • Pr. CIT Vs. N.K. Proteins Ltd. reported in (2020) 429 ITR 493 (Guj) • Kusumlata Sonthalia Vs. Pr. CIT (ITAT Kolkata) (2020) 82 ITR (Trib) 382 • Narain SinglaVs PCIT ITA No. 427/Chd/2015 Chd-Trib order dated 31/08/2015 • CIT Vs Anil Kumar Sharma 335ITR 83 Delhi-HC. • PromodKasharichand Shah Vs. Pr. CIT, Valsad in ITA No. 43/SR/2018 order dt. 16/03/2021 • M/s Unipro Techno Infrastructure vsPr CIT in ITA No.…

M/S I G Petrochemicals Ltd vs. The Asst Commissioner of Income Tax

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed

ITA/219/2011HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 260Section 263

…LTD, supra, 'CHIEF CIT Vs. KESARIA TEA CO. LTD.' (2002) 254 ITR 0434 (SC), 'CIT Vs. CHEMSWORTH (P) LTD.' (2020) 275 TAXMAN 408 (KAR), 'CIT & ANR. Vs. AZTEC SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY LTD.' (2020) 428 ITR 245 (KAR), 'PRL. CIT Vs. N.K.PROTEINS LTD.' (2020) 429 ITR 493 (GUJ), 'CIT & ANR. Vs. CYBER PARK DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS LTD.' (2021) 430 ITR 55 (KAR), MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA, supra, 'CIT & ANR. Vs. COMPAQ ELECTRIC LTD.' (2012) 249 CTR 0214 (KAR) AND 'CIT & ANR. Vs. COMPAQ ELECTRIC LTD. (2019) 261 TAXMAN 0071 (SC). 7 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue submitted that the Asse…

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Agriculturel Market Committee

ITTA/219/2011HC Telangana27 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN