ONGC v. CIT

376 ITR 306Supreme Court of India2015#363 most cited

What is ONGC v. CIT authority for?

Income derived by a non-resident for services related to mineral oil operations, falling under the presumptive taxation regime of Section 44BB, cannot simultaneously be treated as fees for technical services under Section 9(1)(vii). The specific presumptive provisions override the general FTS definition, particularly when DTAA applies.

241

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

ONGC v. CIT · Section 44BB · Section 44DA · Section 9(1)(vii) · fees for technical services · FTS · presumptive taxation · non-resident income · DTAA · permanent establishment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ONGC v. CIT

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 vs. Technip France Sas

In the result the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no

ITA/56/2023HC Delhi05 Feb 2024

Bench: Us It Has Been Conceded That Insofar As The Issues Emanating From Section 9(1)(Vii) Read With Section 44Da Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act”] Are Concerned, The Same Stands Conclusively Answered By The Supreme Court In Its Judgment Rendered In Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. [(2015) 376 Itr 306]. 2. Having Gone Through The Detailed Order Which Was Penned By Us On 22 February 2023, We Note That The Solitary Issue Which Now This Is A Digitally Signed Order. The Authenticity Of The Order Can Be Re-Verified From Delhi High Court Order Portal By Scanning The Qr Code Shown Above. The Order Is Downloaded From The Dhc Server On 13/12/2024 At 15:00:35

Section 115Section 293Section 32Section 42Section 44Section 44BSection 44DSection 72Section 9(1)(vii)

…ection 9(1)(vii) read with Section 44DA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act”] are concerned, the same stands conclusively answered by the Supreme Court in its judgment rendered in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. [(2015) 376 ITR 306]. 2. Having gone through the detailed order which was penned by us on 22 February 2023, we note that the solitary issue which now This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 a…

DCIT (International Taxation), Circle-1, Dehradun vs. Baker Hughes Singapore Pte, Mumbai

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 1883/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2013-14 Baker Hughes Singapore Pte., Versus Dcit (International Taxation) C/O Nangla & Co., A-109, Circle-1, Dehradun. Sector 136, Noida. Pan: Aaacb8516F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dcit (International Taxation) Versus Baker Hughes Singapore Pte., Circle-1, Dehradun. C/O Nangla & Co., A-109, Sector 136, Noida. (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 132/Del/2018 (In Ita No.1883/Del/2018) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Baker Hughes Singapore Pte., Versus Dcit (International Taxation) C/O Nangla & Co., A-109, Circle-1, Dehradun. Sector 136, Noida. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Amit Arora, C.A. & Sh. Itesh Dodhi, C.A. Revenue By : Sh. Mayank Kumar, Jcit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 23.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 15.09.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, C.A. &For Respondent: Sh. Mayank Kumar, JCIT-DR
Section 44BSection 44DSection 9(1)(vii)

…rious decisions of the coordinate Bench including in assessee’s own case in assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2011-12. Further, he strongly relied upon the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. CIT (2015) 376 ITR 306 (SC) and decision of the Tribunal in case of MI Overseas Ltd. vs. ADIT (ITA No. 2956/Del/2013 & Ors. dated 08.06.2021). 7 ITA No. 5897/Del/2017, 1883/Del/2018 & C.O. No. 132/Del/2018 9. Per contra, strongly relying upon the observations of the Assessing Officer and learned first appellate authority, learned Departmental Representative submit…

Baker Hughes Singapore Pte, Noida vs. DCIT (International Taxation), Circle-1, Dehradun

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 5897/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2013-14 Baker Hughes Singapore Pte., Versus Dcit (International Taxation) C/O Nangla & Co., A-109, Circle-1, Dehradun. Sector 136, Noida. Pan: Aaacb8516F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dcit (International Taxation) Versus Baker Hughes Singapore Pte., Circle-1, Dehradun. C/O Nangla & Co., A-109, Sector 136, Noida. (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 132/Del/2018 (In Ita No.1883/Del/2018) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Baker Hughes Singapore Pte., Versus Dcit (International Taxation) C/O Nangla & Co., A-109, Circle-1, Dehradun. Sector 136, Noida. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Amit Arora, C.A. & Sh. Itesh Dodhi, C.A. Revenue By : Sh. Mayank Kumar, Jcit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 23.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 15.09.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, C.A. &For Respondent: Sh. Mayank Kumar, JCIT-DR
Section 44BSection 44DSection 9(1)(vii)

…rious decisions of the coordinate Bench including in assessee’s own case in assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2011-12. Further, he strongly relied upon the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. CIT (2015) 376 ITR 306 (SC) and decision of the Tribunal in case of MI Overseas Ltd. vs. ADIT (ITA No. 2956/Del/2013 & Ors. dated 08.06.2021). 7 ITA No. 5897/Del/2017, 1883/Del/2018 & C.O. No. 132/Del/2018 9. Per contra, strongly relying upon the observations of the Assessing Officer and learned first appellate authority, learned Departmental Representative submit…