Neeraj Gupta v. ITO

97 Taxmann.com 76Reported decision2018#6742 most cited

What is Neeraj Gupta v. ITO authority for?

Additions on account of bogus long-term capital gains are deleted when the assessee produces complete evidence of share transactions, including purchase, sale, demat account details, bank payments, and broker statements.

17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Neeraj Gupta v. ITO · Navneet Agarwal v. ITO · 97 Taxmann.com 76 · Section 10(38) · Section 250 · Section 68 · Section 69 · Section 69A · Section 69C · long term capital gain · bogus LTCG · share transactions · documentary evidence · onus of proof

Judgments citing Neeraj Gupta v. ITO

Neeraj Gupta v. ITO (97 Taxmann.com 76) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax