Navodaya Castle (P) Ltd. v. CIT

56 Taxmann.com 18Supreme Court of India2015#1493 most cited

What is Navodaya Castle (P) Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Mere production of identity documents like a certificate of incorporation or PAN is insufficient to prove the genuineness of a transaction or the investor under Section 68, especially when material indicates the investor is a paper company and not a genuine party.

76

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Navodaya Castle v. CIT · Section 68 · share application money · genuineness of transaction · identity of subscriber · paper company · unexplained cash credit · burden of proof · source of source · accommodation entry · mere identity documents insufficient

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Navodaya Castle (P) Ltd. v. CIT

Income Tax Officer 15(2)-1, Mumbai vs. Iraisaa Developers Private Limited, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby ordered to be dismissed

ITA 1810/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1810/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Ito-15(2)-1, Mumbai Room बिधम/ M/S. Iraisaa Developers Pvt. No.452 4Th Floor, Aayakar Ltd. D2, Big Splash, Sector- Vs. Bhavan, M.K. Road, 17, Vashi, Navi Mumbai- Mumbai-400020. 400703. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabci3061M (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Revenue By: Shri N. Hemalatha (Dr) Assessee By: Shri Devendra Jain (Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 18.06.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 07.09.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 08.12.2017 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 24, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2009- 10. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds: - "1. "On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of [He Cast & M Law, The Ld Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Unsecured Loans Amounting To Rs,50,00,000/- Made Under Section Cit A Of The Income Tax Act, Without Appreciating The Findings Of The Assessing Officer On The Basis Of

For Appellant: Shri Devendra Jain (AR)For Respondent: Shri N. Hemalatha (DR)
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, AM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1810/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) ITO-15(2)-1, Mumbai Room बिधम/ M/s. Iraisaa Developers Pvt. No.452 4th Floor, Aayakar Ltd. D2, Big Splash, Sector- Vs. Bhavan, M.K. Road, 17, Vashi, Navi Mumbai- Mumbai-400020. 400703. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AABCI3061M (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Revenue by: Shri N. Hemalatha (DR) Assessee by: Shri Devendra Jain (AR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 18.06.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Da…