Sh. Evalueserve.Com Private Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, New Delhi
In the result ground No. 8 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 4001/DEL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 May 2017AY 2006-07
Bench: Shri I. C. Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishievalueserve.Com Private Vs. Ito, Ltd, Ward-11(2), 701, Guru Apartments, New Delhi Sector-14, Rohni, New Delhi Pan: Aaace8014F (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: i. Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv ii. Sh. Sumit Lal ChandaniFor Respondent: Sh. Neeraj Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)(ii)Section 234BSection 271Section 92Section 92C
…clusion of persistent loss making companies‘ filter with respect to the rejection of 2 comparables of the assessee. He submitted that the filter is a reasonable filter relying upon the decision of the coordinate bench in case of Navisite India private limited 53 Taxmann.com 73 that diminishing revenue/persistent losses are not in conformity with the normal operational results and thus the companies incurring losses cannot be taken as a comparable. He further referred to the decision of the coordinate bench in case of Aithent technologies private limited versus DCIT 74 Taxmann.com 214 wherein the identical filter…