NavdeepDingra v. CIT

56 Taxmann.com 67High Court2015#1202 most cited

What is NavdeepDingra v. CIT authority for?

Statements made during a search under section 132(4), even if retracted, can be used to prove bogus purchases.

94

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Navdeep Dingra v. CIT · section 132(4) · retracted statement · bogus purchases · search assessment · section 132 · statement under oath · section 143(3) · assessment procedure

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing NavdeepDingra v. CIT